评价乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检的质量

M. Pajares, J.M. Freire, P. Moreno, A. Utor, A. Tocino, E. Alonso
{"title":"评价乳腺癌患者前哨淋巴结活检的质量","authors":"M. Pajares,&nbsp;J.M. Freire,&nbsp;P. Moreno,&nbsp;A. Utor,&nbsp;A. Tocino,&nbsp;E. Alonso","doi":"10.1016/S1578-200X(10)70027-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) has been demonstrated to be a safe alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer staging. The multidisciplinary team must do it with rigor and demonstrate that they have fulfilled some essential criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the quality of the procedure in the Breast Pathology Unit of Hospital Puerta del Mar, using the self-evaluation guidelines of the Spanish Society of Senology and Breast Pathology.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>These guidelines establish some objective and measurable evaluation criteria related to the aspects that intervene in the SLNB. Each criterion is associated to 4 levels of quality standards. There are 3 essential criteria of mandatory fulfillment to implement SLNB in the clinical practice. They evaluate care experience (6 criteria), operative aspects (18 criteria, 3 essential) and scientific activity (8 indicators).</p><p>The initial validation phase included 50 patients and the application phase 120 patients (February 2009).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three essential criteria related to the detection of the sentinel node (98%), accredited sensitivity (90%), and mean number of axillary sentinel nodes (2.1) were fulfilled. The application of self-evaluation guidelines in our Unit obtained a global score of 39 out of 71 points, quality level II being the most prevalent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>During the validation phase, our unit fulfilled the criteria established to implement the procedure. Following that, the use of this guideline accredits the good practice of the SLNB procedure and makes it possible to identify the areas of improvement, in our case, those related to the scientific and training activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101111,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)","volume":"29 5","pages":"Pages 236-240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1578-200X(10)70027-9","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the quality of the sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in patients with breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"M. Pajares,&nbsp;J.M. Freire,&nbsp;P. Moreno,&nbsp;A. Utor,&nbsp;A. Tocino,&nbsp;E. Alonso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1578-200X(10)70027-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) has been demonstrated to be a safe alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer staging. The multidisciplinary team must do it with rigor and demonstrate that they have fulfilled some essential criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the quality of the procedure in the Breast Pathology Unit of Hospital Puerta del Mar, using the self-evaluation guidelines of the Spanish Society of Senology and Breast Pathology.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>These guidelines establish some objective and measurable evaluation criteria related to the aspects that intervene in the SLNB. Each criterion is associated to 4 levels of quality standards. There are 3 essential criteria of mandatory fulfillment to implement SLNB in the clinical practice. They evaluate care experience (6 criteria), operative aspects (18 criteria, 3 essential) and scientific activity (8 indicators).</p><p>The initial validation phase included 50 patients and the application phase 120 patients (February 2009).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three essential criteria related to the detection of the sentinel node (98%), accredited sensitivity (90%), and mean number of axillary sentinel nodes (2.1) were fulfilled. The application of self-evaluation guidelines in our Unit obtained a global score of 39 out of 71 points, quality level II being the most prevalent.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>During the validation phase, our unit fulfilled the criteria established to implement the procedure. Following that, the use of this guideline accredits the good practice of the SLNB procedure and makes it possible to identify the areas of improvement, in our case, those related to the scientific and training activities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 236-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1578-200X(10)70027-9\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1578200X10700279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espa?ola de Medicina Nuclear (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1578200X10700279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)已被证明是一种安全的替代腋窝淋巴结清扫在乳腺癌分期。多学科团队必须严格执行,并证明他们已经满足了一些基本标准。目的采用西班牙老年和乳腺病理学会的自我评价指南,对Puerta del Mar医院乳腺病理科的手术质量进行评价。材料和方法这些指南建立了一些客观的、可测量的评价标准,涉及到干预SLNB的各个方面。每一个标准都与4个级别的质量标准相关联。在临床实践中实施SLNB有三个必要的强制履行标准。他们评估护理经验(6项标准)、手术方面(18项标准,3项基本标准)和科学活动(8项指标)。初始验证阶段包括50名患者,申请阶段包括120名患者(2009年2月)。结果符合前哨淋巴结检出率(98%)、认可灵敏度(90%)和腋窝前哨淋巴结平均数目(2.1)三个基本标准。自我评价准则在我们单位的应用获得了39分(总分71分)的全球得分,质量等级II是最普遍的。在验证阶段,我单位满足了为实施该程序而建立的标准。在此之后,本指南的使用认可了SLNB程序的良好实践,并使其能够确定改进的领域,在我们的情况下,与科学和培训活动有关的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the quality of the sentinel lymph node biopsy procedure in patients with breast cancer

The Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB) has been demonstrated to be a safe alternative to axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer staging. The multidisciplinary team must do it with rigor and demonstrate that they have fulfilled some essential criteria.

Objective

To evaluate the quality of the procedure in the Breast Pathology Unit of Hospital Puerta del Mar, using the self-evaluation guidelines of the Spanish Society of Senology and Breast Pathology.

Material and method

These guidelines establish some objective and measurable evaluation criteria related to the aspects that intervene in the SLNB. Each criterion is associated to 4 levels of quality standards. There are 3 essential criteria of mandatory fulfillment to implement SLNB in the clinical practice. They evaluate care experience (6 criteria), operative aspects (18 criteria, 3 essential) and scientific activity (8 indicators).

The initial validation phase included 50 patients and the application phase 120 patients (February 2009).

Results

Three essential criteria related to the detection of the sentinel node (98%), accredited sensitivity (90%), and mean number of axillary sentinel nodes (2.1) were fulfilled. The application of self-evaluation guidelines in our Unit obtained a global score of 39 out of 71 points, quality level II being the most prevalent.

Conclusion

During the validation phase, our unit fulfilled the criteria established to implement the procedure. Following that, the use of this guideline accredits the good practice of the SLNB procedure and makes it possible to identify the areas of improvement, in our case, those related to the scientific and training activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信