S. Tippabhotla, Sandeep Yergude, C. Gadiko, S. Thota, Sohel Md. Khan, R. Battula, V. Vobalaboina
{"title":"双嘧达莫ER和乙酰水杨酸200 mg + 25 mg胶囊在成年健康男女空腹条件下的稳态生物等效性研究","authors":"S. Tippabhotla, Sandeep Yergude, C. Gadiko, S. Thota, Sohel Md. Khan, R. Battula, V. Vobalaboina","doi":"10.3109/10601333.2013.803113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of the study was to evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics and establish bioequivalence between the test (dipyridamole ER and acetyl salicylic acid 200 mg + 25 mg capsules of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, India) against equal doses of reference (AGGRENOX® retard capsule of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany) formulations in 72 healthy adult male and female volunteers under fasting conditions. This was an open-label, block randomized, multiple dose, two-period, two-sequence, cross-over study separated by a washout period of 8 days. On day 5 of each period, post-dose blood samples were collected up to 12 h and analyzed for dipyridamole, salicylic acid and acetyl salicylic acid using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The 90% CI for dipyridamole (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and Cmin.ss) and for salicylic acid (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and %ptf) lie within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00–125.00%, thus permitting one to conclude for bioequivalence. In conclusion, both the formulations were well tolerated and the test product was bioequivalent to the reference product in terms of the rate and extent of absorption at steady state.","PeriodicalId":10446,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","volume":"60 1","pages":"38 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Steady state bioequivalence study of dipyridamole ER and acetyl salicylic acid 200 mg + 25 mg capsules in adult healthy male and female volunteers under fasting condition\",\"authors\":\"S. Tippabhotla, Sandeep Yergude, C. Gadiko, S. Thota, Sohel Md. Khan, R. Battula, V. Vobalaboina\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/10601333.2013.803113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of the study was to evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics and establish bioequivalence between the test (dipyridamole ER and acetyl salicylic acid 200 mg + 25 mg capsules of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, India) against equal doses of reference (AGGRENOX® retard capsule of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany) formulations in 72 healthy adult male and female volunteers under fasting conditions. This was an open-label, block randomized, multiple dose, two-period, two-sequence, cross-over study separated by a washout period of 8 days. On day 5 of each period, post-dose blood samples were collected up to 12 h and analyzed for dipyridamole, salicylic acid and acetyl salicylic acid using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The 90% CI for dipyridamole (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and Cmin.ss) and for salicylic acid (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and %ptf) lie within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00–125.00%, thus permitting one to conclude for bioequivalence. In conclusion, both the formulations were well tolerated and the test product was bioequivalent to the reference product in terms of the rate and extent of absorption at steady state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"38 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2013.803113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/10601333.2013.803113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是在72名健康成年志愿者的禁食条件下,评估稳态药代动力学并建立试验(双嘧达莫ER和乙酰水杨酸200 mg + 25 mg胶囊,Dr. Reddy 's Laboratories Limited,印度)与等剂量参考(勃林格殷格翰制药有限公司,KG 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein,德国)配方的AGGRENOX®延迟胶囊之间的生物等效性。这是一项开放标签、块随机、多剂量、两期、两序列、交叉研究,中间间隔8天洗脱期。在每个周期的第5天,采集给药后12 h的血液样本,使用经过验证的LC-MS/MS方法分析双嘧达莫、水杨酸和乙酰水杨酸。双嘧达莫的90% CI (AUC(0 -τ))。党卫军,Cmax。ss和Cmin.ss)和水杨酸(AUC(0 -τ))。党卫军,Cmax。Ss和%ptf)在80.00-125.00%的可接受生物等效性范围内,因此可以得出生物等效性的结论。综上所述,两种制剂均具有良好的耐受性,在稳态吸收速率和吸收程度方面,试验产品与对照产品具有生物等效性。
Steady state bioequivalence study of dipyridamole ER and acetyl salicylic acid 200 mg + 25 mg capsules in adult healthy male and female volunteers under fasting condition
Abstract The aim of the study was to evaluate the steady state pharmacokinetics and establish bioequivalence between the test (dipyridamole ER and acetyl salicylic acid 200 mg + 25 mg capsules of Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited, India) against equal doses of reference (AGGRENOX® retard capsule of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co., KG 55216 Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany) formulations in 72 healthy adult male and female volunteers under fasting conditions. This was an open-label, block randomized, multiple dose, two-period, two-sequence, cross-over study separated by a washout period of 8 days. On day 5 of each period, post-dose blood samples were collected up to 12 h and analyzed for dipyridamole, salicylic acid and acetyl salicylic acid using a validated LC-MS/MS method. The 90% CI for dipyridamole (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and Cmin.ss) and for salicylic acid (AUC(0–τ).ss, Cmax.ss and %ptf) lie within the accepted bioequivalence range of 80.00–125.00%, thus permitting one to conclude for bioequivalence. In conclusion, both the formulations were well tolerated and the test product was bioequivalent to the reference product in terms of the rate and extent of absorption at steady state.