反对储蓄:货币和信贷市场的建议论述

Cameron Harwick
{"title":"反对储蓄:货币和信贷市场的建议论述","authors":"Cameron Harwick","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3021115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of savings in economics has a variety of mutually incompatible meanings. This paper goes through various interpretations of the term and argues that, for the sake of clarity, it can and should be replaced with more precise terms. In order to show the significance of doing so, the paper then offers an “augmented” loanable funds model. \nUnlike the standard model, which was developed in the context of unintermediated lending, our mode: \n1) does not identify the supply of loanable funds with “savings”, and \n2) explicitly connects the banking sector to the supply of money with something more theoretically robust than a simple money multiplier. \nThe resulting construction clarifies the relationship between the markets for money and credit, and is more faithful to the image of banks as creators of credit, while still retaining the pedagogical simplicity of the original loanable funds model.","PeriodicalId":11689,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Against Savings: A Suggested Exposition of the Markets for Money and Credit\",\"authors\":\"Cameron Harwick\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3021115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The notion of savings in economics has a variety of mutually incompatible meanings. This paper goes through various interpretations of the term and argues that, for the sake of clarity, it can and should be replaced with more precise terms. In order to show the significance of doing so, the paper then offers an “augmented” loanable funds model. \\nUnlike the standard model, which was developed in the context of unintermediated lending, our mode: \\n1) does not identify the supply of loanable funds with “savings”, and \\n2) explicitly connects the banking sector to the supply of money with something more theoretically robust than a simple money multiplier. \\nThe resulting construction clarifies the relationship between the markets for money and credit, and is more faithful to the image of banks as creators of credit, while still retaining the pedagogical simplicity of the original loanable funds model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3021115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3021115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在经济学中,储蓄的概念具有多种相互矛盾的含义。本文通过对该术语的各种解释,并认为,为了清晰起见,它可以而且应该被更精确的术语所取代。为了说明这样做的意义,本文提出了一个“增强型”可贷资金模型。与在非中介贷款背景下发展起来的标准模型不同,我们的模型:1)没有将可贷款资金的供应与“储蓄”等同起来,2)明确地将银行业与货币供应联系起来,这在理论上比简单的货币乘数更强大。由此产生的结构澄清了货币市场和信贷市场之间的关系,更忠实于银行作为信贷创造者的形象,同时仍然保留了原始可贷资金模型的教学简单性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Against Savings: A Suggested Exposition of the Markets for Money and Credit
The notion of savings in economics has a variety of mutually incompatible meanings. This paper goes through various interpretations of the term and argues that, for the sake of clarity, it can and should be replaced with more precise terms. In order to show the significance of doing so, the paper then offers an “augmented” loanable funds model. Unlike the standard model, which was developed in the context of unintermediated lending, our mode: 1) does not identify the supply of loanable funds with “savings”, and 2) explicitly connects the banking sector to the supply of money with something more theoretically robust than a simple money multiplier. The resulting construction clarifies the relationship between the markets for money and credit, and is more faithful to the image of banks as creators of credit, while still retaining the pedagogical simplicity of the original loanable funds model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信