东欧电影中的明星和明星

IF 0.3 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION
G. Gergely
{"title":"东欧电影中的明星和明星","authors":"G. Gergely","doi":"10.1080/2040350X.2022.2043734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A significant body of scholarship since Dyer’s groundbreaking work on stars (Dyer 1979, 1986, 1998) has challenged the view that stardom was limited to Hollywood (e.g. Vincendeau 2000, Ascheid 2003, Hayward 2004, Soila 2009, Bandhauer and Royer 2015). Star biographies are ubiquitous in Eastern Europe [e.g. Bános (1978)], there is a wealth of archival material to mine (e.g. Zbigniew Cybulski headshots and lobby cards traded on online auction sites), and scholars have considered film actors in relation to representations of femininity (e.g. Attwood 1993, Iordanova 2003, Mazierska and Ostrowska 2006), in relation to national (e.g. Ostrowska 2005, Williams 2015, Gergely 2016) and transnational identity (Kristensen 2014, Mazierska 2014, Smith 2014). However, much work remains to be done in the context of Eastern Europe on stars, stardom, celebrity and infrastructure supporting star systems (e.g. agencies, the tabloid press, fan literature, and exhibition, distribution and marketing firms). The false perception that stardom was negligible or even non-existent and the assumption that state-supported film industries were insensitive to audience demand and therefore had no need for stars remain hard to shake because what writing there is on Eastern European stars is dispersed and yet to grow into a body of work that can offer a comprehensive and nuanced view. The blurring of state socialist Eastern Europe with the region’s other faces and eras is also a factor. The false image of Cold War-era Eastern Europe established in scholarship ‘from the West’ (Imre 2005, xii), and popular representations of state socialist Eastern Europe as drab, do not easily mesh with the notions of glitz and glamour cultivated by classical Hollywood’s publicity departments. Thus there appears to be a cognitive dissonance between the notions of stardom and Eastern Europe. At play, too, is the dominance of the auteur-director and the resistant film in approaches to Eastern European cinema of the Cold War (Imre 2005, xii; Mazierska 2010, 11), a dynamic that downplays and obscures other creatives in the filmmaking process, including actors. Nonetheless, stars were and remain ubiquitous and their role is important to the functioning of Eastern European centres of film production. The springboard for analyses of stardom in Hollywood is the insight, first systematically developed by Dyer, that stars are a phenomenon of production and consumption, they are aligned with the ideological project and practices of Hollywood and accumulate meanings projected onto them by consumers and producers, which stars, with their individual agency, challenge or play up to (1998). These dynamics can be logically read against a capitalist system of production, but are perhaps less straightforward to map against the command economies of state socialism. It may seem that the relatively overt ambition to convey specific ideas and ideologies via the cinema – remember the sentiment attributed to Lenin: ‘of all the arts, for us the most important is cinema’ (Taylor and Christie 1994, 53) – reduces the complexity of the phenomenon of stardom in state socialist settings, but it must be noted","PeriodicalId":52267,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Eastern European Cinema","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stars and Stardom in Eastern European Cinema\",\"authors\":\"G. Gergely\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2040350X.2022.2043734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A significant body of scholarship since Dyer’s groundbreaking work on stars (Dyer 1979, 1986, 1998) has challenged the view that stardom was limited to Hollywood (e.g. Vincendeau 2000, Ascheid 2003, Hayward 2004, Soila 2009, Bandhauer and Royer 2015). Star biographies are ubiquitous in Eastern Europe [e.g. Bános (1978)], there is a wealth of archival material to mine (e.g. Zbigniew Cybulski headshots and lobby cards traded on online auction sites), and scholars have considered film actors in relation to representations of femininity (e.g. Attwood 1993, Iordanova 2003, Mazierska and Ostrowska 2006), in relation to national (e.g. Ostrowska 2005, Williams 2015, Gergely 2016) and transnational identity (Kristensen 2014, Mazierska 2014, Smith 2014). However, much work remains to be done in the context of Eastern Europe on stars, stardom, celebrity and infrastructure supporting star systems (e.g. agencies, the tabloid press, fan literature, and exhibition, distribution and marketing firms). The false perception that stardom was negligible or even non-existent and the assumption that state-supported film industries were insensitive to audience demand and therefore had no need for stars remain hard to shake because what writing there is on Eastern European stars is dispersed and yet to grow into a body of work that can offer a comprehensive and nuanced view. The blurring of state socialist Eastern Europe with the region’s other faces and eras is also a factor. The false image of Cold War-era Eastern Europe established in scholarship ‘from the West’ (Imre 2005, xii), and popular representations of state socialist Eastern Europe as drab, do not easily mesh with the notions of glitz and glamour cultivated by classical Hollywood’s publicity departments. Thus there appears to be a cognitive dissonance between the notions of stardom and Eastern Europe. At play, too, is the dominance of the auteur-director and the resistant film in approaches to Eastern European cinema of the Cold War (Imre 2005, xii; Mazierska 2010, 11), a dynamic that downplays and obscures other creatives in the filmmaking process, including actors. Nonetheless, stars were and remain ubiquitous and their role is important to the functioning of Eastern European centres of film production. The springboard for analyses of stardom in Hollywood is the insight, first systematically developed by Dyer, that stars are a phenomenon of production and consumption, they are aligned with the ideological project and practices of Hollywood and accumulate meanings projected onto them by consumers and producers, which stars, with their individual agency, challenge or play up to (1998). These dynamics can be logically read against a capitalist system of production, but are perhaps less straightforward to map against the command economies of state socialism. It may seem that the relatively overt ambition to convey specific ideas and ideologies via the cinema – remember the sentiment attributed to Lenin: ‘of all the arts, for us the most important is cinema’ (Taylor and Christie 1994, 53) – reduces the complexity of the phenomenon of stardom in state socialist settings, but it must be noted\",\"PeriodicalId\":52267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Eastern European Cinema\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Eastern European Cinema\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2040350X.2022.2043734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Eastern European Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2040350X.2022.2043734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从Dyer对明星的开创性研究(Dyer 1979, 1986, 1998)以来,大量的学术研究挑战了明星仅限于好莱坞的观点(例如Vincendeau 2000, Ascheid 2003, Hayward 2004, Soila 2009, Bandhauer和Royer 2015)。明星传记在东欧无处不在[例如Bános(1978)],有丰富的档案材料可供挖掘(例如Zbigniew Cybulski的头像和在线拍卖网站上交易的游说卡),学者们已经考虑了电影演员与女性特质表现的关系(例如Attwood 1993, Iordanova 2003, Mazierska和Ostrowska 2006),与国家(例如Ostrowska 2005, Williams 2015, Gergely 2016)和跨国身份(Kristensen 2014, Mazierska 2014)。史密斯2014年)。然而,在东欧的背景下,关于明星、明星、名人和支持明星系统的基础设施(例如机构、小报、粉丝文学、展览、发行和营销公司)仍有许多工作要做。认为明星微不足道甚至不存在的错误看法,以及认为国家支持的电影产业对观众需求不敏感,因此不需要明星的假设,仍然难以动摇,因为关于东欧明星的写作是分散的,但尚未发展成一个可以提供全面和细致入微观点的作品体系。国家社会主义东欧与该地区其他面貌和时代的模糊也是一个因素。冷战时期东欧的错误形象建立在“来自西方”的学术(Imre 2005, xii),以及国家社会主义东欧单调乏味的流行代表,不容易与经典好莱坞宣传部门培养的浮华和魅力的概念相吻合。因此,在明星的概念和东欧之间似乎有一种认知上的不协调。在研究冷战时期东欧电影的方法中,导演和抵抗电影的主导地位也在起作用(Imre 2005, xii;Mazierska 2010, 11),一种淡化和模糊电影制作过程中包括演员在内的其他创意的动态。尽管如此,明星仍然无处不在,他们的作用对东欧电影制作中心的运作很重要。对好莱坞明星进行分析的出发点是戴尔首先系统地提出的一种见解,即明星是一种生产和消费现象,他们与好莱坞的意识形态项目和实践相一致,并积累了消费者和制片人投射到他们身上的意义,而这些意义是由明星以其个人代理机构挑战或发挥的(1998)。从逻辑上讲,这些动态可以被解读为反对资本主义生产体系,但可能不那么直接地映射为反对国家社会主义的指令经济。似乎通过电影传达特定思想和意识形态的相对公开的野心-记住列宁的观点:“在所有艺术中,对我们来说最重要的是电影”(Taylor和Christie 1994, 53) -减少了国家社会主义背景下明星现象的复杂性,但必须注意到这一点
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stars and Stardom in Eastern European Cinema
A significant body of scholarship since Dyer’s groundbreaking work on stars (Dyer 1979, 1986, 1998) has challenged the view that stardom was limited to Hollywood (e.g. Vincendeau 2000, Ascheid 2003, Hayward 2004, Soila 2009, Bandhauer and Royer 2015). Star biographies are ubiquitous in Eastern Europe [e.g. Bános (1978)], there is a wealth of archival material to mine (e.g. Zbigniew Cybulski headshots and lobby cards traded on online auction sites), and scholars have considered film actors in relation to representations of femininity (e.g. Attwood 1993, Iordanova 2003, Mazierska and Ostrowska 2006), in relation to national (e.g. Ostrowska 2005, Williams 2015, Gergely 2016) and transnational identity (Kristensen 2014, Mazierska 2014, Smith 2014). However, much work remains to be done in the context of Eastern Europe on stars, stardom, celebrity and infrastructure supporting star systems (e.g. agencies, the tabloid press, fan literature, and exhibition, distribution and marketing firms). The false perception that stardom was negligible or even non-existent and the assumption that state-supported film industries were insensitive to audience demand and therefore had no need for stars remain hard to shake because what writing there is on Eastern European stars is dispersed and yet to grow into a body of work that can offer a comprehensive and nuanced view. The blurring of state socialist Eastern Europe with the region’s other faces and eras is also a factor. The false image of Cold War-era Eastern Europe established in scholarship ‘from the West’ (Imre 2005, xii), and popular representations of state socialist Eastern Europe as drab, do not easily mesh with the notions of glitz and glamour cultivated by classical Hollywood’s publicity departments. Thus there appears to be a cognitive dissonance between the notions of stardom and Eastern Europe. At play, too, is the dominance of the auteur-director and the resistant film in approaches to Eastern European cinema of the Cold War (Imre 2005, xii; Mazierska 2010, 11), a dynamic that downplays and obscures other creatives in the filmmaking process, including actors. Nonetheless, stars were and remain ubiquitous and their role is important to the functioning of Eastern European centres of film production. The springboard for analyses of stardom in Hollywood is the insight, first systematically developed by Dyer, that stars are a phenomenon of production and consumption, they are aligned with the ideological project and practices of Hollywood and accumulate meanings projected onto them by consumers and producers, which stars, with their individual agency, challenge or play up to (1998). These dynamics can be logically read against a capitalist system of production, but are perhaps less straightforward to map against the command economies of state socialism. It may seem that the relatively overt ambition to convey specific ideas and ideologies via the cinema – remember the sentiment attributed to Lenin: ‘of all the arts, for us the most important is cinema’ (Taylor and Christie 1994, 53) – reduces the complexity of the phenomenon of stardom in state socialist settings, but it must be noted
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Eastern European Cinema
Studies in Eastern European Cinema Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信