意识形态时代对一门可疑科学的关注与怀疑:20世纪70年代意大利比较教育的艰难之路

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Letterio Todaro
{"title":"意识形态时代对一门可疑科学的关注与怀疑:20世纪70年代意大利比较教育的艰难之路","authors":"Letterio Todaro","doi":"10.24908/encounters.v21i0.14097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Up until the 1970s, comparative research on education had been scarcely developed in Italy. The rise of a general attention on the promising chances offered by the comparative inquiries in educational sciences was mainly due to the growing influence of several international institutions and organizations in framing a number of studies and reports on the educational process within a comparative perspective. However, the development of comparative education also met resistances and constraints in the Italian framework. A lot of critical voices rising from radical, neo-Marxist, and “not aligned” cultures questioned the alleged impartiality of the comparative discipline, expounding serious concern about the legitimacy of its scientific pretensions. On the whole, the outstanding critical views on the rise of comparative education fostered a wide suspicion of the influence of global agents in assessing the goals of education and particularly of the role of the main international organizations leading the strategies for global development.","PeriodicalId":41777,"journal":{"name":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concerns and Suspicions on a Questionable Science in the Era of Ideologies: The Hard Pathway of Comparative Education in Italy during the 1970s\",\"authors\":\"Letterio Todaro\",\"doi\":\"10.24908/encounters.v21i0.14097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Up until the 1970s, comparative research on education had been scarcely developed in Italy. The rise of a general attention on the promising chances offered by the comparative inquiries in educational sciences was mainly due to the growing influence of several international institutions and organizations in framing a number of studies and reports on the educational process within a comparative perspective. However, the development of comparative education also met resistances and constraints in the Italian framework. A lot of critical voices rising from radical, neo-Marxist, and “not aligned” cultures questioned the alleged impartiality of the comparative discipline, expounding serious concern about the legitimacy of its scientific pretensions. On the whole, the outstanding critical views on the rise of comparative education fostered a wide suspicion of the influence of global agents in assessing the goals of education and particularly of the role of the main international organizations leading the strategies for global development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Encounters in Theory and History of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Encounters in Theory and History of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24908/encounters.v21i0.14097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/encounters.v21i0.14097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

直到20世纪70年代,意大利对教育的比较研究还很少开展。人们普遍注意到教育科学中比较研究所提供的有希望的机会,这主要是由于几个国际机构和组织在从比较的角度编制关于教育过程的一些研究和报告方面的影响力日益增强。然而,比较教育的发展在意大利框架内也遇到了阻力和制约。许多来自激进、新马克思主义和“不结盟”文化的批评声音质疑所谓的比较学科的公正性,并对其科学主张的合法性表示严重关切。总的来说,关于比较教育兴起的突出的批评意见使人们普遍怀疑全球行动者在评估教育目标方面的影响,特别是主要国际组织领导全球发展战略的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concerns and Suspicions on a Questionable Science in the Era of Ideologies: The Hard Pathway of Comparative Education in Italy during the 1970s
Up until the 1970s, comparative research on education had been scarcely developed in Italy. The rise of a general attention on the promising chances offered by the comparative inquiries in educational sciences was mainly due to the growing influence of several international institutions and organizations in framing a number of studies and reports on the educational process within a comparative perspective. However, the development of comparative education also met resistances and constraints in the Italian framework. A lot of critical voices rising from radical, neo-Marxist, and “not aligned” cultures questioned the alleged impartiality of the comparative discipline, expounding serious concern about the legitimacy of its scientific pretensions. On the whole, the outstanding critical views on the rise of comparative education fostered a wide suspicion of the influence of global agents in assessing the goals of education and particularly of the role of the main international organizations leading the strategies for global development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Encounters in Theory and History of Education
Encounters in Theory and History of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信