意外的、无法解释的和突然终止的治疗触摸的后果和相关成本的推断

S. Peck
{"title":"意外的、无法解释的和突然终止的治疗触摸的后果和相关成本的推断","authors":"S. Peck","doi":"10.1177/1533210107302934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative study reports 12 patients' experiences following the unplanned and unexpected termination of their healing touch treatments. Physically disabled, chronically ill patients requiring nursing home levels of care, who were being assisted in staying at home with agency support, had been treated one to two times weekly to monthly over a period of 3 to 4 months by a healing touch practitioner, under a pilot study. Patients had been interviewed twice during their treatments and had described positive experiences with healing touch. Midway through the study, there was an abrupt stopping of treatments without warning or explanation to either patients or researchers. Naturalistic inquiry methodology was used to explore patients' subsequent reactions and experiences. Six patients had negative experiences, including increased pain and impaired functional ability, sleep, and emotional status. Six patients continued to have positive experiences after treatments were terminated. Estimates of potential cost savings with healing touch treatment, as well as ethical implications of discontinuing beneficial treatment without warning or replacement, are discussed.","PeriodicalId":10611,"journal":{"name":"Complementary Health Practice Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"144 - 160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aftermath of the Unexpected, Unexplained, and Abrupt Termination of Healing Touch and Extrapolation of Related Costs\",\"authors\":\"S. Peck\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1533210107302934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This qualitative study reports 12 patients' experiences following the unplanned and unexpected termination of their healing touch treatments. Physically disabled, chronically ill patients requiring nursing home levels of care, who were being assisted in staying at home with agency support, had been treated one to two times weekly to monthly over a period of 3 to 4 months by a healing touch practitioner, under a pilot study. Patients had been interviewed twice during their treatments and had described positive experiences with healing touch. Midway through the study, there was an abrupt stopping of treatments without warning or explanation to either patients or researchers. Naturalistic inquiry methodology was used to explore patients' subsequent reactions and experiences. Six patients had negative experiences, including increased pain and impaired functional ability, sleep, and emotional status. Six patients continued to have positive experiences after treatments were terminated. Estimates of potential cost savings with healing touch treatment, as well as ethical implications of discontinuing beneficial treatment without warning or replacement, are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Complementary Health Practice Review\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"144 - 160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Complementary Health Practice Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533210107302934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary Health Practice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533210107302934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本定性研究报告了12名患者在意外和意外终止治疗后的经历。在一项试验性研究中,需要疗养院级别护理的身体残疾、慢性病患者在机构支持下被协助留在家中,每周或每月接受一至两次治疗,为期3至4个月。患者在治疗期间接受了两次采访,并描述了治疗触摸的积极体验。在研究进行到一半时,治疗突然停止,没有给患者或研究人员任何警告或解释。采用自然主义调查方法探讨患者的后续反应和体验。6名患者有负面经历,包括疼痛增加、功能能力、睡眠和情绪状态受损。6名患者在治疗结束后仍有积极的经历。本文讨论了愈合触摸治疗的潜在成本节约估计,以及在没有警告或替代的情况下停止有益治疗的伦理影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aftermath of the Unexpected, Unexplained, and Abrupt Termination of Healing Touch and Extrapolation of Related Costs
This qualitative study reports 12 patients' experiences following the unplanned and unexpected termination of their healing touch treatments. Physically disabled, chronically ill patients requiring nursing home levels of care, who were being assisted in staying at home with agency support, had been treated one to two times weekly to monthly over a period of 3 to 4 months by a healing touch practitioner, under a pilot study. Patients had been interviewed twice during their treatments and had described positive experiences with healing touch. Midway through the study, there was an abrupt stopping of treatments without warning or explanation to either patients or researchers. Naturalistic inquiry methodology was used to explore patients' subsequent reactions and experiences. Six patients had negative experiences, including increased pain and impaired functional ability, sleep, and emotional status. Six patients continued to have positive experiences after treatments were terminated. Estimates of potential cost savings with healing touch treatment, as well as ethical implications of discontinuing beneficial treatment without warning or replacement, are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信