澳大利亚私人难民赞助计划:创造互补途径还是将人道主义私有化?

IF 0.9 Q3 DEMOGRAPHY
Refuge Pub Date : 2019-06-05 DOI:10.7202/1064823ar
Asher Hirsch, Khanh Hoang, A. Vogl
{"title":"澳大利亚私人难民赞助计划:创造互补途径还是将人道主义私有化?","authors":"Asher Hirsch, Khanh Hoang, A. Vogl","doi":"10.7202/1064823ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides the first history and critique of Australia’s private refugee sponsorship program, the Community Support Program (CSP). As more countries turn to community sponsorship of refugees as a means to fill the “resettlement gap,” Australia’s model provides a cautionary tale. The CSP, introduced in 2017, does not expand Australia’s overall resettlement commitment but instead takes places from within the existing humanitarian resettlement program. The Australian program charges sponsors exorbitant application fees, while simultaneously prioritizing refugees who are “job ready,” with English-language skills and ability to integrate quickly, undermining the principle of resettling the most vulnerable. As such, we argue that the CSP hijacks places from within Australia’s humanitarian program and represents a market-driven outsourcing and privatization of Australia’s refugee resettlement priorities and commitments.","PeriodicalId":45974,"journal":{"name":"Refuge","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Australia’s Private Refugee Sponsorship Program: Creating Complementary Pathways Or Privatising Humanitarianism?\",\"authors\":\"Asher Hirsch, Khanh Hoang, A. Vogl\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1064823ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides the first history and critique of Australia’s private refugee sponsorship program, the Community Support Program (CSP). As more countries turn to community sponsorship of refugees as a means to fill the “resettlement gap,” Australia’s model provides a cautionary tale. The CSP, introduced in 2017, does not expand Australia’s overall resettlement commitment but instead takes places from within the existing humanitarian resettlement program. The Australian program charges sponsors exorbitant application fees, while simultaneously prioritizing refugees who are “job ready,” with English-language skills and ability to integrate quickly, undermining the principle of resettling the most vulnerable. As such, we argue that the CSP hijacks places from within Australia’s humanitarian program and represents a market-driven outsourcing and privatization of Australia’s refugee resettlement priorities and commitments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Refuge\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Refuge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1064823ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Refuge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1064823ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

这篇文章提供了澳大利亚私人难民赞助计划,社区支持计划(CSP)的第一个历史和批评。随着越来越多的国家将社区赞助难民作为填补“安置缺口”的一种手段,澳大利亚的模式提供了一个警示。2017年推出的CSP并没有扩大澳大利亚的整体安置承诺,而是从现有的人道主义安置计划中进行。澳大利亚的项目向赞助者收取高昂的申请费,同时优先考虑那些“有工作准备”、有英语技能、能够迅速融入社会的难民,这破坏了重新安置最弱势群体的原则。因此,我们认为,CSP从澳大利亚的人道主义计划中劫持了地方,代表了澳大利亚难民安置优先事项和承诺的市场驱动的外包和私有化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Australia’s Private Refugee Sponsorship Program: Creating Complementary Pathways Or Privatising Humanitarianism?
This article provides the first history and critique of Australia’s private refugee sponsorship program, the Community Support Program (CSP). As more countries turn to community sponsorship of refugees as a means to fill the “resettlement gap,” Australia’s model provides a cautionary tale. The CSP, introduced in 2017, does not expand Australia’s overall resettlement commitment but instead takes places from within the existing humanitarian resettlement program. The Australian program charges sponsors exorbitant application fees, while simultaneously prioritizing refugees who are “job ready,” with English-language skills and ability to integrate quickly, undermining the principle of resettling the most vulnerable. As such, we argue that the CSP hijacks places from within Australia’s humanitarian program and represents a market-driven outsourcing and privatization of Australia’s refugee resettlement priorities and commitments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Refuge
Refuge DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
32 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信