非介入性研究的法律问题

T. A. Goldina, N. Suvorov, Anastasiya Vadimovna Remizova, D. S. Zhigunova, O. N. Moryleva, V. A. Krechikov, I. Murashko
{"title":"非介入性研究的法律问题","authors":"T. A. Goldina, N. Suvorov, Anastasiya Vadimovna Remizova, D. S. Zhigunova, O. N. Moryleva, V. A. Krechikov, I. Murashko","doi":"10.31556/2219-0678.2019.38.4.040-048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though in Russia there has been a growing interest in conducting non-interventional studies (NIS) in recent years, the existence of gaps in their legal regulation leads to the fact that many medical institutions and healthcare professionals refuse to participate in this type of activities. This paper analyzes such refusals and discusses several legal aspects, such as the contracting with medical organizations and investigators, issues of personal data protection, as well as a brief comparative analysis of the requirements for non-intervention trials in the EEU countries. To overcome the organizational barriers of NIS, it is necessary to develop common criteria/concepts at both pharmaceutical companies and professional medical communities levels, with the subsequent training of healthcare professionals and organizers on various aspects of NIS. This article will be helpful for all healthcare professionals, especially physicians, researchers and decision-makers, who decide to conduct NIS at medical institutions.","PeriodicalId":18386,"journal":{"name":"Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice (Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор)","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal Aspects of Non-Interventional Studies Conduction\",\"authors\":\"T. A. Goldina, N. Suvorov, Anastasiya Vadimovna Remizova, D. S. Zhigunova, O. N. Moryleva, V. A. Krechikov, I. Murashko\",\"doi\":\"10.31556/2219-0678.2019.38.4.040-048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even though in Russia there has been a growing interest in conducting non-interventional studies (NIS) in recent years, the existence of gaps in their legal regulation leads to the fact that many medical institutions and healthcare professionals refuse to participate in this type of activities. This paper analyzes such refusals and discusses several legal aspects, such as the contracting with medical organizations and investigators, issues of personal data protection, as well as a brief comparative analysis of the requirements for non-intervention trials in the EEU countries. To overcome the organizational barriers of NIS, it is necessary to develop common criteria/concepts at both pharmaceutical companies and professional medical communities levels, with the subsequent training of healthcare professionals and organizers on various aspects of NIS. This article will be helpful for all healthcare professionals, especially physicians, researchers and decision-makers, who decide to conduct NIS at medical institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice (Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice (Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31556/2219-0678.2019.38.4.040-048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice (Медицинские технологии. Оценка и выбор)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31556/2219-0678.2019.38.4.040-048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管近年来俄罗斯对开展非介入性研究的兴趣日益浓厚,但由于其法律法规存在漏洞,导致许多医疗机构和保健专业人员拒绝参加这类活动。本文分析了这种拒绝,并讨论了几个法律方面,如与医疗机构和调查人员的合同,个人数据保护问题,以及欧亚经济联盟国家对不干预试验要求的简要比较分析。为了克服国家信息系统的组织障碍,有必要在制药公司和专业医疗社区两级制定共同的标准/概念,随后对保健专业人员和组织者进行有关国家信息系统各个方面的培训。本文将有助于所有医疗保健专业人员,特别是决定在医疗机构实施NIS的医生、研究人员和决策者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal Aspects of Non-Interventional Studies Conduction
Even though in Russia there has been a growing interest in conducting non-interventional studies (NIS) in recent years, the existence of gaps in their legal regulation leads to the fact that many medical institutions and healthcare professionals refuse to participate in this type of activities. This paper analyzes such refusals and discusses several legal aspects, such as the contracting with medical organizations and investigators, issues of personal data protection, as well as a brief comparative analysis of the requirements for non-intervention trials in the EEU countries. To overcome the organizational barriers of NIS, it is necessary to develop common criteria/concepts at both pharmaceutical companies and professional medical communities levels, with the subsequent training of healthcare professionals and organizers on various aspects of NIS. This article will be helpful for all healthcare professionals, especially physicians, researchers and decision-makers, who decide to conduct NIS at medical institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信