公共部门绩效管理研究的元综述

G.J. van Helden , C. Reichard
{"title":"公共部门绩效管理研究的元综述","authors":"G.J. van Helden ,&nbsp;C. Reichard","doi":"10.1016/j.tekhne.2013.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper is a meta-review of public sector performance management research as published over the last decade. Contingency-based studies are the predominant types of research on public sector performance management, but the review points to a lack of consistent evidence of which contingency variables are influential under which circumstances. The paper also indicates that a variety of research questions in this field can be addressed by different theories, especially coming from economics, organization theory and institutional sociology. Finally, a set of underdeveloped research areas are highlighted: (1) more extensive theorizing as opposed to the mainly pragmatic perspectives currently adopted; (2) inclusion of ‘hard data’ in the analysis of organizational performance; (3) taking a broader perspective on transformation processes, that is, other than the simple fabrication trajectory, particularly complex project-type of processes and network organizations; (4) benefiting from insights of performance management research in the private sector, for example about pay-for-performance systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101212,"journal":{"name":"Tékhne","volume":"11 1","pages":"Pages 10-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tekhne.2013.03.001","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-review of public sector performance management research\",\"authors\":\"G.J. van Helden ,&nbsp;C. Reichard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tekhne.2013.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper is a meta-review of public sector performance management research as published over the last decade. Contingency-based studies are the predominant types of research on public sector performance management, but the review points to a lack of consistent evidence of which contingency variables are influential under which circumstances. The paper also indicates that a variety of research questions in this field can be addressed by different theories, especially coming from economics, organization theory and institutional sociology. Finally, a set of underdeveloped research areas are highlighted: (1) more extensive theorizing as opposed to the mainly pragmatic perspectives currently adopted; (2) inclusion of ‘hard data’ in the analysis of organizational performance; (3) taking a broader perspective on transformation processes, that is, other than the simple fabrication trajectory, particularly complex project-type of processes and network organizations; (4) benefiting from insights of performance management research in the private sector, for example about pay-for-performance systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tékhne\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 10-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.tekhne.2013.03.001\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tékhne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1645991113000224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tékhne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1645991113000224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

本文是对过去十年发表的公共部门绩效管理研究的元综述。基于权变的研究是公共部门绩效管理的主要研究类型,但审查指出,缺乏一致的证据表明哪些权变变量在哪些情况下具有影响。本文还指出,该领域的各种研究问题可以通过不同的理论来解决,特别是来自经济学、组织理论和制度社会学的理论。最后,本文强调了一系列研究不足的领域:(1)相对于目前主要采用的实用主义观点,理论化的研究更加广泛;(2)将“硬数据”纳入组织绩效分析;(3)对转型过程采取更广阔的视角,即除了简单的制造轨迹,特别是复杂的项目类型的过程和网络组织;(4)受益于私营部门绩效管理研究的见解,例如关于绩效薪酬制度的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A meta-review of public sector performance management research

This paper is a meta-review of public sector performance management research as published over the last decade. Contingency-based studies are the predominant types of research on public sector performance management, but the review points to a lack of consistent evidence of which contingency variables are influential under which circumstances. The paper also indicates that a variety of research questions in this field can be addressed by different theories, especially coming from economics, organization theory and institutional sociology. Finally, a set of underdeveloped research areas are highlighted: (1) more extensive theorizing as opposed to the mainly pragmatic perspectives currently adopted; (2) inclusion of ‘hard data’ in the analysis of organizational performance; (3) taking a broader perspective on transformation processes, that is, other than the simple fabrication trajectory, particularly complex project-type of processes and network organizations; (4) benefiting from insights of performance management research in the private sector, for example about pay-for-performance systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信