基于不完整临床数据的上市许可:国际经验与展望

D. Goryachev, N. E. Uvarova, G. V. Shukshina
{"title":"基于不完整临床数据的上市许可:国际经验与展望","authors":"D. Goryachev, N. E. Uvarova, G. V. Shukshina","doi":"10.30895/1991-2919-2020-10-3-152-163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"No new drug can be used in clinical practice without marketing authorisation. Acquisition of the necessary amount of clinical data may take several years, which is especially critical for pernicious diseases for which no alternative therapy is available. Lack of treatment options creates conditions in which early introduction of efficacious therapy into clinical practice is becoming crucial. This need resulted in the development of new regulatory approaches aimed at accelerated approval of drugs both by reducing the time frame and by fulfilling post-authorisation requirements. The aim of the study was to review regulatory approaches to the accelerated authorisation procedure based on incomplete clinical data, and analyse their potential use in the Russian Federation. The paper presents an overview of authorisation pathways based on incomplete clinical data, which are used by different regulatory authorities, as well as regulatory approaches used in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and as part of the Russian national authorisation procedure. It was demonstrated that the approaches used by the US, European, and Japanese regulatory authorities, despite some differences, share a common objective of accelerated approval of drugs that fill an unmet medical need. The EAEU also has a conditional approval procedure, but the proposed criteria do not make it possible to use this approach in a real clinical situation of an unmet medical need. A similar national procedure would make it possible to reach a compromise between the needs of the healthcare system and the sound basis for informed decisions of the regulatory authority. Accelerated introduction of novel drugs that address unmet medical needs would set the national regulation in the area of drug circulation on the right track.","PeriodicalId":22286,"journal":{"name":"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marketing Authorisation Based on Incomplete Clinical Data: International Experience and Prospects\",\"authors\":\"D. Goryachev, N. E. Uvarova, G. V. Shukshina\",\"doi\":\"10.30895/1991-2919-2020-10-3-152-163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"No new drug can be used in clinical practice without marketing authorisation. Acquisition of the necessary amount of clinical data may take several years, which is especially critical for pernicious diseases for which no alternative therapy is available. Lack of treatment options creates conditions in which early introduction of efficacious therapy into clinical practice is becoming crucial. This need resulted in the development of new regulatory approaches aimed at accelerated approval of drugs both by reducing the time frame and by fulfilling post-authorisation requirements. The aim of the study was to review regulatory approaches to the accelerated authorisation procedure based on incomplete clinical data, and analyse their potential use in the Russian Federation. The paper presents an overview of authorisation pathways based on incomplete clinical data, which are used by different regulatory authorities, as well as regulatory approaches used in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and as part of the Russian national authorisation procedure. It was demonstrated that the approaches used by the US, European, and Japanese regulatory authorities, despite some differences, share a common objective of accelerated approval of drugs that fill an unmet medical need. The EAEU also has a conditional approval procedure, but the proposed criteria do not make it possible to use this approach in a real clinical situation of an unmet medical need. A similar national procedure would make it possible to reach a compromise between the needs of the healthcare system and the sound basis for informed decisions of the regulatory authority. Accelerated introduction of novel drugs that address unmet medical needs would set the national regulation in the area of drug circulation on the right track.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2020-10-3-152-163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bulletin of the Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30895/1991-2919-2020-10-3-152-163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

没有上市许可,新药不能用于临床。获得必要数量的临床数据可能需要数年时间,这对于无法获得替代疗法的恶性疾病尤其重要。治疗选择的缺乏造成了早期将有效治疗引入临床实践变得至关重要的条件。这一需求导致了新的监管方法的发展,旨在通过缩短时间框架和满足批准后的要求来加速药物的批准。该研究的目的是根据不完整的临床数据审查加速批准程序的监管方法,并分析其在俄罗斯联邦的潜在用途。本文概述了不同监管机构使用的基于不完整临床数据的授权途径,以及欧亚经济联盟(EAEU)和俄罗斯国家授权程序中使用的监管方法。研究表明,美国、欧洲和日本监管机构使用的方法尽管存在一些差异,但都有一个共同的目标,即加速批准填补未满足医疗需求的药物。欧亚经济联盟也有一个有条件的批准程序,但拟议的标准不允许在未满足医疗需求的实际临床情况下使用这种方法。类似的国家程序将有可能在医疗保健系统的需求和监管当局知情决策的健全基础之间达成妥协。加速引进解决未得到满足的医疗需求的新药,将使药品流通领域的国家监管走上正轨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Marketing Authorisation Based on Incomplete Clinical Data: International Experience and Prospects
No new drug can be used in clinical practice without marketing authorisation. Acquisition of the necessary amount of clinical data may take several years, which is especially critical for pernicious diseases for which no alternative therapy is available. Lack of treatment options creates conditions in which early introduction of efficacious therapy into clinical practice is becoming crucial. This need resulted in the development of new regulatory approaches aimed at accelerated approval of drugs both by reducing the time frame and by fulfilling post-authorisation requirements. The aim of the study was to review regulatory approaches to the accelerated authorisation procedure based on incomplete clinical data, and analyse their potential use in the Russian Federation. The paper presents an overview of authorisation pathways based on incomplete clinical data, which are used by different regulatory authorities, as well as regulatory approaches used in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and as part of the Russian national authorisation procedure. It was demonstrated that the approaches used by the US, European, and Japanese regulatory authorities, despite some differences, share a common objective of accelerated approval of drugs that fill an unmet medical need. The EAEU also has a conditional approval procedure, but the proposed criteria do not make it possible to use this approach in a real clinical situation of an unmet medical need. A similar national procedure would make it possible to reach a compromise between the needs of the healthcare system and the sound basis for informed decisions of the regulatory authority. Accelerated introduction of novel drugs that address unmet medical needs would set the national regulation in the area of drug circulation on the right track.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信