{"title":"《博斯韦尔词典》与18世纪苏格兰方言的地位","authors":"Taylor F. Walle","doi":"10.1353/sel.2020.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines James Boswell’s still-unpublished “Dictionary of the Scots Language,” contextualizing it within eighteenth-century debates about Scots and emphasizing the ways that it diverges from the work of Boswell’s peers. While Samuel Johnson’s dictionary follows literary precedent, and the work of the Scottish literati encourages readers to minimize the Scottishness of their speech and writing, Boswell’s dictionary features a surprisingly familiar and conversational form of the Scots language. As such, the dictionary both highlights Boswell’s own interest in the vernacular and points to an alternative thread in eighteenth-century thinking about Scots.","PeriodicalId":45835,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boswell’s Dictionary and the Status of Scots Dialect in the Eighteenth Century\",\"authors\":\"Taylor F. Walle\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/sel.2020.0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article examines James Boswell’s still-unpublished “Dictionary of the Scots Language,” contextualizing it within eighteenth-century debates about Scots and emphasizing the ways that it diverges from the work of Boswell’s peers. While Samuel Johnson’s dictionary follows literary precedent, and the work of the Scottish literati encourages readers to minimize the Scottishness of their speech and writing, Boswell’s dictionary features a surprisingly familiar and conversational form of the Scots language. As such, the dictionary both highlights Boswell’s own interest in the vernacular and points to an alternative thread in eighteenth-century thinking about Scots.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2020.0020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN ENGLISH LITERATURE 1500-1900","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sel.2020.0020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Boswell’s Dictionary and the Status of Scots Dialect in the Eighteenth Century
Abstract:This article examines James Boswell’s still-unpublished “Dictionary of the Scots Language,” contextualizing it within eighteenth-century debates about Scots and emphasizing the ways that it diverges from the work of Boswell’s peers. While Samuel Johnson’s dictionary follows literary precedent, and the work of the Scottish literati encourages readers to minimize the Scottishness of their speech and writing, Boswell’s dictionary features a surprisingly familiar and conversational form of the Scots language. As such, the dictionary both highlights Boswell’s own interest in the vernacular and points to an alternative thread in eighteenth-century thinking about Scots.
期刊介绍:
SEL focuses on four fields of British literature in rotating, quarterly issues: English Renaissance, Tudor and Stuart Drama, Restoration and Eighteenth Century, and Nineteenth Century. The editors select learned, readable papers that contribute significantly to the understanding of British literature from 1500 to 1900. SEL is well known for thecommissioned omnibus review of recent studies in the field that is included in each issue. In a single volume, readers might find an argument for attributing a previously unknown work to Shakespeare or de-attributing a famous work from Milton, a study ofthe connections between class and genre in the Restoration Theater.