人格和情绪能力对学业成绩的影响:感知压力介导的直接和间接途径

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Current Issues in Personality Psychology Pub Date : 2021-12-12 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp.2021.111423
Min You, Sylvain Laborde, Robert Samuel Vaughan, Agnès Salinas
{"title":"人格和情绪能力对学业成绩的影响:感知压力介导的直接和间接途径","authors":"Min You, Sylvain Laborde, Robert Samuel Vaughan, Agnès Salinas","doi":"10.5114/cipp.2021.111423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the factors influencing academic performance (AP), individual differences at the trait level such as personality and emotional competences (EC) have been found to play a critical role, similarly to state variables such as perceived stress (PS).</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>The aim of this study was to clarify whether the influence of personality (Big Five) and EC on AP (general point average) is direct and/or mediated via PS. 537 undergraduate students from a French university (112 male and 425 female, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19.84 years, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 1.74 years, range = 18-30 years; first year: <i>n</i> = 293, 55%; second year: <i>n</i> = 162, 30%, third year: <i>n</i> = 82, 15%) filled out the test battery around three weeks before the final examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Path analysis showed that AP was directly predicted by conscientiousness (+), neuroticism (+), extraversion (-) and perceived stress (-), while perceived stress was predicted by neuroticism (+) and by intrapersonal EC (-).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results illustrate the robust influence of conscientiousness on AP, while EC was not found to influence AP directly, but indirectly via its effect on PS.</p>","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of personality and emotional competences on academic performance: direct and indirect pathways mediated by perceived stress.\",\"authors\":\"Min You, Sylvain Laborde, Robert Samuel Vaughan, Agnès Salinas\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/cipp.2021.111423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the factors influencing academic performance (AP), individual differences at the trait level such as personality and emotional competences (EC) have been found to play a critical role, similarly to state variables such as perceived stress (PS).</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>The aim of this study was to clarify whether the influence of personality (Big Five) and EC on AP (general point average) is direct and/or mediated via PS. 537 undergraduate students from a French university (112 male and 425 female, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19.84 years, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 1.74 years, range = 18-30 years; first year: <i>n</i> = 293, 55%; second year: <i>n</i> = 162, 30%, third year: <i>n</i> = 82, 15%) filled out the test battery around three weeks before the final examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Path analysis showed that AP was directly predicted by conscientiousness (+), neuroticism (+), extraversion (-) and perceived stress (-), while perceived stress was predicted by neuroticism (+) and by intrapersonal EC (-).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results illustrate the robust influence of conscientiousness on AP, while EC was not found to influence AP directly, but indirectly via its effect on PS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535623/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Issues in Personality Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.111423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.111423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在影响学业成绩(AP)的因素中,人格和情绪能力(EC)等特质层面的个体差异与感知压力(PS)等状态变量一样,起着至关重要的作用。参与者和程序:本研究的目的是澄清人格(大五项)和EC对AP(一般平均点)的影响是否直接和/或通过PS介导。来自法国一所大学的537名本科生(男112名,女425名,年龄= 19.84岁,年龄= 1.74岁,年龄范围= 18-30岁;第一年:n = 293,55%;第二年:n = 162,30%,第三年:n = 82,15%)在期末考试前三周左右填写测试电池。结果:通径分析显示,尽责性(+)、神经质性(+)、外向性(-)和感知压力(-)直接预测AP,感知压力由神经质性(+)和内省性EC(-)直接预测。结论:尽责性对AP有显著影响,而责任心对AP没有直接影响,而是通过对PS的影响间接影响AP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of personality and emotional competences on academic performance: direct and indirect pathways mediated by perceived stress.

Background: Among the factors influencing academic performance (AP), individual differences at the trait level such as personality and emotional competences (EC) have been found to play a critical role, similarly to state variables such as perceived stress (PS).

Participants and procedure: The aim of this study was to clarify whether the influence of personality (Big Five) and EC on AP (general point average) is direct and/or mediated via PS. 537 undergraduate students from a French university (112 male and 425 female, Mage = 19.84 years, SDage = 1.74 years, range = 18-30 years; first year: n = 293, 55%; second year: n = 162, 30%, third year: n = 82, 15%) filled out the test battery around three weeks before the final examination.

Results: Path analysis showed that AP was directly predicted by conscientiousness (+), neuroticism (+), extraversion (-) and perceived stress (-), while perceived stress was predicted by neuroticism (+) and by intrapersonal EC (-).

Conclusions: The results illustrate the robust influence of conscientiousness on AP, while EC was not found to influence AP directly, but indirectly via its effect on PS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信