作为伪作品的基督教教义对话和胡安·德valdes的其他警告

IF 0.3 3区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

REVISTA DE FILOLOGIA ESPANOLA Pub Date : 2020-06-30 DOI:10.3989/rfe.2020.002

Fernando Baños Vallejo

{"title":"作为伪作品的基督教教义对话和胡安·德valdes的其他警告","authors":"Fernando Baños Vallejo","doi":"10.3989/rfe.2020.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to clarify that the Dialogo de doctrina cristiana was constructed and published as an apocryphal work, and not as an anonymous work. Given that the text has recently been attributed to Vives, the first operation is to reaffirm the authorship of Juan de Valdes, relying on the documentary evidence of actions promoted by the Inquisition that leave no doubt about the real authorship, while explaining why Valdes hid his identity and opted for an apocryphal and fictitious authorship. This mask is also analyzed as part of a set of strategies of concealment and visibility that serve the author to protect himself, but also to give the book more authority and thus favour its acceptance.","PeriodicalId":44540,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA DE FILOLOGIA ESPANOLA","volume":"41 1","pages":"37-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El Diálogo de doctrina cristiana como obra apócrifa y otras cautelas de Juan de Valdés\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Baños Vallejo\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/rfe.2020.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to clarify that the Dialogo de doctrina cristiana was constructed and published as an apocryphal work, and not as an anonymous work. Given that the text has recently been attributed to Vives, the first operation is to reaffirm the authorship of Juan de Valdes, relying on the documentary evidence of actions promoted by the Inquisition that leave no doubt about the real authorship, while explaining why Valdes hid his identity and opted for an apocryphal and fictitious authorship. This mask is also analyzed as part of a set of strategies of concealment and visibility that serve the author to protect himself, but also to give the book more authority and thus favour its acceptance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVISTA DE FILOLOGIA ESPANOLA\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"37-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVISTA DE FILOLOGIA ESPANOLA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/rfe.2020.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA DE FILOLOGIA ESPANOLA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/rfe.2020.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是澄清，《基督教教义对话录》是作为一个虚构的作品而不是作为一个匿名的作品而构建和出版的。鉴于文本最近被归因于Vives，第一个操作是重申胡安·德·巴尔德斯的作者身份，依靠由宗教裁判所推动的行动的书面证据，对真正的作者留下了毫无疑问，同时解释为什么巴尔德斯隐藏他的身份，选择了一个虚构的作者。这个面具也被分析为一系列隐藏和可见策略的一部分，这些策略为作者提供了保护自己的服务，但也给了这本书更多的权威，从而有利于它的接受。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

El Diálogo de doctrina cristiana como obra apócrifa y otras cautelas de Juan de Valdés

The purpose of this study is to clarify that the Dialogo de doctrina cristiana was constructed and published as an apocryphal work, and not as an anonymous work. Given that the text has recently been attributed to Vives, the first operation is to reaffirm the authorship of Juan de Valdes, relying on the documentary evidence of actions promoted by the Inquisition that leave no doubt about the real authorship, while explaining why Valdes hid his identity and opted for an apocryphal and fictitious authorship. This mask is also analyzed as part of a set of strategies of concealment and visibility that serve the author to protect himself, but also to give the book more authority and thus favour its acceptance.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

REVISTA DE FILOLOGIA ESPANOLA Multiple-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Established in 1914 by Ramón Menéndez Pidal, Revista de Filología Española is edited in two half-yearly issues that compound one volume with around 450 pages, holding research papers on Spanish Philology. Along its trajectory RFE reflects the changes experimented by Philology itself. RFE also provides bibliographical information from Journals on the same subjects and received in the Library of Philology (CSIC). Assistant Editors, according to the evaluation performed by external revieweres, decide about aceptation and publishing. Submissions must be original, unpublished works. The language of the Journal is Spanish. Articles in other Romance languages may be published if aproved by the Assistant Editors.