基于新的D&M模型,编制了临床护理信息系统有效性评价量表,并进行了信度和效度评价

Yongxin Zhao, Ying Gu, Xiaobo Zhang, Fang Liu, Y.-T. Wan
{"title":"基于新的D&M模型,编制了临床护理信息系统有效性评价量表,并进行了信度和效度评价","authors":"Yongxin Zhao, Ying Gu, Xiaobo Zhang, Fang Liu, Y.-T. Wan","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo develop a nursing information system effectiveness evaluation scale based on the new D&M model and verify its reliability and validity. \n \n \nMethods \nSix dimensions of the scale were constructed based on the framework of the new D&M model,through the methods including literature reading,expert discussion to determine the specific indicators of the questionnaire, and then forming the initial questionnaire. The dimensions and items of the test scale were modified by discriminant analysis method, correlation coefficient analysis method and Cronbach's αcoefficient method. The construct validity of the scale was analyzed by exploratory factor analysis method, and the dimensions and items of the test scale were optimized. Internal consistency and retest reliability were used to analyze the reliability of the scale. \n \n \nResults \nFive common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis to explain the total variation of 57.462%. The final version of the scale consists of 5 dimensions and 23 items. The total Cronbachα coefficient of the scale was 0.768, and the total correlation coefficient was 0.849. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe 5 dimensions retained by the scale have good construction validity, which can effectively explain the psychological characteristics of the subjects, and the results measured by the scale have good stability and consistency. This scale can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of nursing information system. \n \n \nKey words: \nThe new DM Nursing information system; Scale; Reliability and validity","PeriodicalId":22999,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of practical nursing","volume":"9 1","pages":"544-550"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developed the clinical nursing information system effectiveness evaluation scale based on the new D&M model and conducted reliability and validity evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Yongxin Zhao, Ying Gu, Xiaobo Zhang, Fang Liu, Y.-T. Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.07.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo develop a nursing information system effectiveness evaluation scale based on the new D&M model and verify its reliability and validity. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nSix dimensions of the scale were constructed based on the framework of the new D&M model,through the methods including literature reading,expert discussion to determine the specific indicators of the questionnaire, and then forming the initial questionnaire. The dimensions and items of the test scale were modified by discriminant analysis method, correlation coefficient analysis method and Cronbach's αcoefficient method. The construct validity of the scale was analyzed by exploratory factor analysis method, and the dimensions and items of the test scale were optimized. Internal consistency and retest reliability were used to analyze the reliability of the scale. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nFive common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis to explain the total variation of 57.462%. The final version of the scale consists of 5 dimensions and 23 items. The total Cronbachα coefficient of the scale was 0.768, and the total correlation coefficient was 0.849. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe 5 dimensions retained by the scale have good construction validity, which can effectively explain the psychological characteristics of the subjects, and the results measured by the scale have good stability and consistency. This scale can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of nursing information system. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nThe new DM Nursing information system; Scale; Reliability and validity\",\"PeriodicalId\":22999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of practical nursing\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"544-550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of practical nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.07.013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of practical nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.07.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的编制基于D&M模型的护理信息系统有效性评价量表,并对其信度和效度进行验证。方法基于新D&M模型的框架,构建量表的六个维度,通过文献阅读、专家讨论等方法确定问卷的具体指标,形成初步问卷。采用判别分析法、相关系数分析法和Cronbach α系数法对测试量表的维度和项目进行修改。采用探索性因子分析法对量表的结构效度进行分析,并对测试量表的维度和项目进行优化。采用内部一致性和重测信度分析量表的信度。结果探索性因子分析提取出5个共同因素,解释总变异率为57.462%。最终版本的量表由5个维度和23个项目组成。量表的总cronbach - α系数为0.768,总相关系数为0.849。结论量表保留的5个维度具有较好的建构效度,能有效解释被试的心理特征,量表测量结果具有较好的稳定性和一致性。该量表可用于评价护理信息系统的有效性。关键词:新型DM护理信息系统;规模;信度和效度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developed the clinical nursing information system effectiveness evaluation scale based on the new D&M model and conducted reliability and validity evaluation
Objective To develop a nursing information system effectiveness evaluation scale based on the new D&M model and verify its reliability and validity. Methods Six dimensions of the scale were constructed based on the framework of the new D&M model,through the methods including literature reading,expert discussion to determine the specific indicators of the questionnaire, and then forming the initial questionnaire. The dimensions and items of the test scale were modified by discriminant analysis method, correlation coefficient analysis method and Cronbach's αcoefficient method. The construct validity of the scale was analyzed by exploratory factor analysis method, and the dimensions and items of the test scale were optimized. Internal consistency and retest reliability were used to analyze the reliability of the scale. Results Five common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis to explain the total variation of 57.462%. The final version of the scale consists of 5 dimensions and 23 items. The total Cronbachα coefficient of the scale was 0.768, and the total correlation coefficient was 0.849. Conclusions The 5 dimensions retained by the scale have good construction validity, which can effectively explain the psychological characteristics of the subjects, and the results measured by the scale have good stability and consistency. This scale can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of nursing information system. Key words: The new DM Nursing information system; Scale; Reliability and validity
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信