{"title":"通过(塔斯马尼亚)老虎的眼睛庆祝BHL澳大利亚","authors":"Nicole Kearney","doi":"10.3897/biss.7.112352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BHL Australia, the Australian branch of the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL), was launched in 2010 and began operation with a single organisation, Museums Victoria in Melbourne. Since then, it has grown considerably. Funded by the Atlas of Living Australia, BHL Australia now digitises biodiversity literature on behalf of 42 organisations across the country. These organisations include museums, herbaria, state libraries, royal societies, government agencies, field naturalist clubs and natural history publishers, many of whom lack the resources to do this work themselves. BHL Australia’s national consortium model, which makes biodiversity literature accessible on behalf of so many organisations, is unique amongst the BHL global community. Most BHL operations digitise material on behalf of a single organisation.\n BHL Australia has now made over 530,000 pages of Australia’s biodiversity knowledge freely accessible online. The BHL Australia Collection includes both published works (books and journals) and unpublished material (collection registers, field diaries and correspondence). The pages of these works are filled with species descriptions, references to historically significant people and, most importantly, scientific data that is critical to ongoing research and conservation efforts. Providing access to materials published as far back as the 1600s and as recently as the current year, the collection chronicles the scientific discovery and understanding of Australia’s biodiversity.\n BHL Australia also leads the global initiative to bring the world's historic biodiversity and taxonomic literature into the modern linked network of scholarly research by incorporating article data into BHL and retrospectively assigning DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) (Kearney et al. 2021). BHL has now assigned more than 162,000 DOIs to historic publications, making them persistently citable and trackable, both within BHL and beyond. \n This paper will celebrate the achievements of BHL Australia by journeying through the (now accessible, discoverable and DOI'd) Tasmanian Tiger literature. It will showcase:\n \n \n \n previously elusive descriptions (and beautiful illustrations) of Thylacines, including those by Gerhard Krefft (1871) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.314741, and John Gould (1863) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.312790;\n \n \n the invaluable creation of links to open access versions from paywalled publications that should be in the public domain, such as the first description of the Thylacine (Harris 1808): open access on BHL; paywalled by Oxford Academic;\n \n \n the many citations of historic taxonomic descriptions that are now appearing as clickable DOI links in modern scholarly articles, taxonomic databases, social media, and Wikipedia (Kearney and Page 2022); and\n \n \n the efforts being made to encourage more authors to cite the authoritative source of taxonomic names (Benichou 2022).\n \n \n \n previously elusive descriptions (and beautiful illustrations) of Thylacines, including those by Gerhard Krefft (1871) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.314741, and John Gould (1863) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.312790;\n the invaluable creation of links to open access versions from paywalled publications that should be in the public domain, such as the first description of the Thylacine (Harris 1808): open access on BHL; paywalled by Oxford Academic;\n the many citations of historic taxonomic descriptions that are now appearing as clickable DOI links in modern scholarly articles, taxonomic databases, social media, and Wikipedia (Kearney and Page 2022); and\n the efforts being made to encourage more authors to cite the authoritative source of taxonomic names (Benichou 2022).\n The extinction of the Thylacine is a stark reminder of the irreversible consequences that arise from a lack of understanding and appreciation of the natural world. Similarly, a lack of access and/or the inability to find biodiversity knowledge hinders our capacity to learn from the past, impeding scientific progress and conservation efforts.\n The Biodiversity Heritage Library was created “to address a major obstacle to scientific research: lack of access to natural history literature” (BHL 2019). BHL Australia has made a substantial contribution to this global mission and has played a significant role in BHL’s transition to a fully searchable, persistently linkable component of the biodiversity knowledge graph (Kearney 2020, Page 2016).","PeriodicalId":9011,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Celebrating BHL Australia through the Eye of the (Tasmanian) Tiger\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Kearney\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/biss.7.112352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BHL Australia, the Australian branch of the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL), was launched in 2010 and began operation with a single organisation, Museums Victoria in Melbourne. Since then, it has grown considerably. Funded by the Atlas of Living Australia, BHL Australia now digitises biodiversity literature on behalf of 42 organisations across the country. These organisations include museums, herbaria, state libraries, royal societies, government agencies, field naturalist clubs and natural history publishers, many of whom lack the resources to do this work themselves. BHL Australia’s national consortium model, which makes biodiversity literature accessible on behalf of so many organisations, is unique amongst the BHL global community. Most BHL operations digitise material on behalf of a single organisation.\\n BHL Australia has now made over 530,000 pages of Australia’s biodiversity knowledge freely accessible online. The BHL Australia Collection includes both published works (books and journals) and unpublished material (collection registers, field diaries and correspondence). The pages of these works are filled with species descriptions, references to historically significant people and, most importantly, scientific data that is critical to ongoing research and conservation efforts. Providing access to materials published as far back as the 1600s and as recently as the current year, the collection chronicles the scientific discovery and understanding of Australia’s biodiversity.\\n BHL Australia also leads the global initiative to bring the world's historic biodiversity and taxonomic literature into the modern linked network of scholarly research by incorporating article data into BHL and retrospectively assigning DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) (Kearney et al. 2021). BHL has now assigned more than 162,000 DOIs to historic publications, making them persistently citable and trackable, both within BHL and beyond. \\n This paper will celebrate the achievements of BHL Australia by journeying through the (now accessible, discoverable and DOI'd) Tasmanian Tiger literature. It will showcase:\\n \\n \\n \\n previously elusive descriptions (and beautiful illustrations) of Thylacines, including those by Gerhard Krefft (1871) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.314741, and John Gould (1863) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.312790;\\n \\n \\n the invaluable creation of links to open access versions from paywalled publications that should be in the public domain, such as the first description of the Thylacine (Harris 1808): open access on BHL; paywalled by Oxford Academic;\\n \\n \\n the many citations of historic taxonomic descriptions that are now appearing as clickable DOI links in modern scholarly articles, taxonomic databases, social media, and Wikipedia (Kearney and Page 2022); and\\n \\n \\n the efforts being made to encourage more authors to cite the authoritative source of taxonomic names (Benichou 2022).\\n \\n \\n \\n previously elusive descriptions (and beautiful illustrations) of Thylacines, including those by Gerhard Krefft (1871) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.314741, and John Gould (1863) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.312790;\\n the invaluable creation of links to open access versions from paywalled publications that should be in the public domain, such as the first description of the Thylacine (Harris 1808): open access on BHL; paywalled by Oxford Academic;\\n the many citations of historic taxonomic descriptions that are now appearing as clickable DOI links in modern scholarly articles, taxonomic databases, social media, and Wikipedia (Kearney and Page 2022); and\\n the efforts being made to encourage more authors to cite the authoritative source of taxonomic names (Benichou 2022).\\n The extinction of the Thylacine is a stark reminder of the irreversible consequences that arise from a lack of understanding and appreciation of the natural world. Similarly, a lack of access and/or the inability to find biodiversity knowledge hinders our capacity to learn from the past, impeding scientific progress and conservation efforts.\\n The Biodiversity Heritage Library was created “to address a major obstacle to scientific research: lack of access to natural history literature” (BHL 2019). BHL Australia has made a substantial contribution to this global mission and has played a significant role in BHL’s transition to a fully searchable, persistently linkable component of the biodiversity knowledge graph (Kearney 2020, Page 2016).\",\"PeriodicalId\":9011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.7.112352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.7.112352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
BHL澳大利亚是生物多样性遗产图书馆(BHL)的澳大利亚分馆,成立于2010年,最初由一个组织——墨尔本的维多利亚博物馆运营。从那以后,它有了相当大的增长。在澳大利亚生活地图集的资助下,BHL澳大利亚现在代表全国42个组织对生物多样性文献进行数字化。这些组织包括博物馆、植物标本馆、国家图书馆、皇家学会、政府机构、野外自然学家俱乐部和自然历史出版商,其中许多人缺乏自己开展这项工作的资源。BHL澳大利亚的国家联盟模式,使生物多样性文献可代表许多组织访问,是BHL全球社区中独一无二的。大多数BHL业务代表单个组织将材料数字化。澳大利亚生物多样性研究所现在已经在网上免费提供了超过53万页的澳大利亚生物多样性知识。BHL澳大利亚收藏包括已出版的作品(书籍和期刊)和未出版的材料(收集登记册,实地日记和通信)。这些作品的页面上充满了物种描述,对历史上重要人物的参考,最重要的是,对正在进行的研究和保护工作至关重要的科学数据。提供可追溯到17世纪和最近一年出版的材料,该收藏记录了澳大利亚生物多样性的科学发现和理解。澳大利亚BHL还领导全球倡议,通过将文章数据纳入BHL并回顾性地分配doi(数字对象标识符),将世界历史上的生物多样性和分类文献纳入现代学术研究网络(Kearney等人,2021)。BHL现在已经为历史出版物分配了超过162,000份doi,使它们在BHL内外都可以持续引用和跟踪。本文将通过(现在可访问的,可发现的和DOI)塔斯马尼亚虎文献来庆祝BHL澳大利亚的成就。它将展示:以前难以捉摸的袋狼描述(和美丽的插图),包括格哈德·克雷夫特(1871年)https://doi.org/10.5962/p.314741和约翰·古尔德(1863年)https://doi.org/10.5962/p.312790;从付费出版物中获取开放获取版本的链接,这些链接本应属于公共领域,例如对袋狼的首次描述(Harris 1808):在BHL上开放获取;付费墙由牛津学术;在现代学术文章、分类数据库、社交媒体和维基百科(Kearney and Page 2022)中,许多历史分类描述的引用现在以可点击的DOI链接出现;并努力鼓励更多的作者引用权威的分类名称来源(Benichou 2022)。以前难以捉摸的袋狼描述(和美丽的插图),包括格哈德·克雷夫特(1871年)https://doi.org/10.5962/p.314741和约翰·古尔德(1863年)https://doi.org/10.5962/p.312790;从付费出版物中获取开放获取版本的链接,这些链接本应属于公共领域,例如对袋狼的首次描述(Harris 1808):在BHL上开放获取;付费墙由牛津学术;在现代学术文章、分类数据库、社交媒体和维基百科(Kearney and Page 2022)中,许多历史分类描述的引用现在以可点击的DOI链接出现;并努力鼓励更多的作者引用权威的分类名称来源(Benichou 2022)。袋狼的灭绝鲜明地提醒我们,缺乏对自然世界的理解和欣赏将带来不可逆转的后果。同样,缺乏获取和/或无法找到生物多样性知识,阻碍了我们从过去学习的能力,阻碍了科学进步和保护工作。生物多样性遗产图书馆的创建是为了“解决科学研究的一个主要障碍:缺乏获取自然历史文献的途径”(BHL 2019)。BHL澳大利亚为这一全球使命做出了重大贡献,并在BHL向生物多样性知识图谱的完全可搜索、持续可链接组件的过渡中发挥了重要作用(Kearney 2020, Page 2016)。
Celebrating BHL Australia through the Eye of the (Tasmanian) Tiger
BHL Australia, the Australian branch of the Biodiversity Heritage Library (BHL), was launched in 2010 and began operation with a single organisation, Museums Victoria in Melbourne. Since then, it has grown considerably. Funded by the Atlas of Living Australia, BHL Australia now digitises biodiversity literature on behalf of 42 organisations across the country. These organisations include museums, herbaria, state libraries, royal societies, government agencies, field naturalist clubs and natural history publishers, many of whom lack the resources to do this work themselves. BHL Australia’s national consortium model, which makes biodiversity literature accessible on behalf of so many organisations, is unique amongst the BHL global community. Most BHL operations digitise material on behalf of a single organisation.
BHL Australia has now made over 530,000 pages of Australia’s biodiversity knowledge freely accessible online. The BHL Australia Collection includes both published works (books and journals) and unpublished material (collection registers, field diaries and correspondence). The pages of these works are filled with species descriptions, references to historically significant people and, most importantly, scientific data that is critical to ongoing research and conservation efforts. Providing access to materials published as far back as the 1600s and as recently as the current year, the collection chronicles the scientific discovery and understanding of Australia’s biodiversity.
BHL Australia also leads the global initiative to bring the world's historic biodiversity and taxonomic literature into the modern linked network of scholarly research by incorporating article data into BHL and retrospectively assigning DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) (Kearney et al. 2021). BHL has now assigned more than 162,000 DOIs to historic publications, making them persistently citable and trackable, both within BHL and beyond.
This paper will celebrate the achievements of BHL Australia by journeying through the (now accessible, discoverable and DOI'd) Tasmanian Tiger literature. It will showcase:
previously elusive descriptions (and beautiful illustrations) of Thylacines, including those by Gerhard Krefft (1871) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.314741, and John Gould (1863) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.312790;
the invaluable creation of links to open access versions from paywalled publications that should be in the public domain, such as the first description of the Thylacine (Harris 1808): open access on BHL; paywalled by Oxford Academic;
the many citations of historic taxonomic descriptions that are now appearing as clickable DOI links in modern scholarly articles, taxonomic databases, social media, and Wikipedia (Kearney and Page 2022); and
the efforts being made to encourage more authors to cite the authoritative source of taxonomic names (Benichou 2022).
previously elusive descriptions (and beautiful illustrations) of Thylacines, including those by Gerhard Krefft (1871) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.314741, and John Gould (1863) https://doi.org/10.5962/p.312790;
the invaluable creation of links to open access versions from paywalled publications that should be in the public domain, such as the first description of the Thylacine (Harris 1808): open access on BHL; paywalled by Oxford Academic;
the many citations of historic taxonomic descriptions that are now appearing as clickable DOI links in modern scholarly articles, taxonomic databases, social media, and Wikipedia (Kearney and Page 2022); and
the efforts being made to encourage more authors to cite the authoritative source of taxonomic names (Benichou 2022).
The extinction of the Thylacine is a stark reminder of the irreversible consequences that arise from a lack of understanding and appreciation of the natural world. Similarly, a lack of access and/or the inability to find biodiversity knowledge hinders our capacity to learn from the past, impeding scientific progress and conservation efforts.
The Biodiversity Heritage Library was created “to address a major obstacle to scientific research: lack of access to natural history literature” (BHL 2019). BHL Australia has made a substantial contribution to this global mission and has played a significant role in BHL’s transition to a fully searchable, persistently linkable component of the biodiversity knowledge graph (Kearney 2020, Page 2016).