先有鸡还是先有蛋?新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)后新诊断间质性肺病(ILD)

G. C. Chiang, T. Zaman, P. Noble
{"title":"先有鸡还是先有蛋?新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)后新诊断间质性肺病(ILD)","authors":"G. C. Chiang, T. Zaman, P. Noble","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A 79-year-old male presented for evaluation of dyspnea and dry cough. Five months prior he was hospitalized with COVID-19 and a pulmonary embolus requiring 2L/min of supplemental oxygen, enoxaparin, hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir. He was discharged home with apixaban and supplemental oxygen. He had a 10 pack-per-year history of smoking and quit fifty years ago. He had no occupational or environmental exposures associated with pulmonary fibrosis. He had no family history of connective tissue disease or pulmonary fibrosis. On physical examination, he had normal vital signs and his saturation was 100% on room air. Pertinent positive exam findings were limited to bibasilar dry crackles. There were no skin, joint, or oral findings. Pulmonary function tests showed normal lung volumes with normal spirometry and a severely decreased diffusing capacity. A CT revealed improvement of ground glass opacities with persistent subpleural reticulations and honeycombing. Notably, lung images of the lower lobes from a CT scan of the abdomen six years prior to this evaluation showed bibasilar reticulations and ground glass infiltrates. Laboratory studies were notable for an elevated ANA titer in a speckled pattern, elevated CCP and elevated anti-SSA 52 kD. Additional autoimmune serologies were negative. Given the presence of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) in prior imaging and elevated autoimmune markers, he was deemed to have had an exacerbation of previously subclinical ILD caused by COVID-19. The long-term effects of the inflammatory response from COVID-19 have not been characterized. Initial data of CT scans in patients show that up to 17% develop fibrotic changes during the course of the disease. It remains to be seen whether there will be a progressive fibrotic phenotype solely attributable COVID-19 itself. This has been described during the H1N1 and SARS-COV1 outbreaks in patients who developed ARDS but is not observed in post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis caused by other etiologies. The key to differentiating between a primary ILD rather than post-COVID-19 hinges on antecedent history. The patient's prior radiographic findings meet the research construct of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) which refers to patterns of increased lung density in patients with no history of ILD. When post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis is observed, due diligence must be taken to determine alternate etiologies of subclinical ILD that may have been unmasked by COVID-19, rather than caused by it. It remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 could activate a latent autoimmunity or potentially cause a de novo autoimmune lung disease as has been suggested.","PeriodicalId":23189,"journal":{"name":"TP31. TP031 INTERESTING CASES ASSOCIATED WITH SARS-COV-2 INFECTION","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Chicken or the Egg? Newly Diagnosed Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) After Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19)\",\"authors\":\"G. C. Chiang, T. Zaman, P. Noble\",\"doi\":\"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A 79-year-old male presented for evaluation of dyspnea and dry cough. Five months prior he was hospitalized with COVID-19 and a pulmonary embolus requiring 2L/min of supplemental oxygen, enoxaparin, hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir. He was discharged home with apixaban and supplemental oxygen. He had a 10 pack-per-year history of smoking and quit fifty years ago. He had no occupational or environmental exposures associated with pulmonary fibrosis. He had no family history of connective tissue disease or pulmonary fibrosis. On physical examination, he had normal vital signs and his saturation was 100% on room air. Pertinent positive exam findings were limited to bibasilar dry crackles. There were no skin, joint, or oral findings. Pulmonary function tests showed normal lung volumes with normal spirometry and a severely decreased diffusing capacity. A CT revealed improvement of ground glass opacities with persistent subpleural reticulations and honeycombing. Notably, lung images of the lower lobes from a CT scan of the abdomen six years prior to this evaluation showed bibasilar reticulations and ground glass infiltrates. Laboratory studies were notable for an elevated ANA titer in a speckled pattern, elevated CCP and elevated anti-SSA 52 kD. Additional autoimmune serologies were negative. Given the presence of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) in prior imaging and elevated autoimmune markers, he was deemed to have had an exacerbation of previously subclinical ILD caused by COVID-19. The long-term effects of the inflammatory response from COVID-19 have not been characterized. Initial data of CT scans in patients show that up to 17% develop fibrotic changes during the course of the disease. It remains to be seen whether there will be a progressive fibrotic phenotype solely attributable COVID-19 itself. This has been described during the H1N1 and SARS-COV1 outbreaks in patients who developed ARDS but is not observed in post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis caused by other etiologies. The key to differentiating between a primary ILD rather than post-COVID-19 hinges on antecedent history. The patient's prior radiographic findings meet the research construct of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) which refers to patterns of increased lung density in patients with no history of ILD. When post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis is observed, due diligence must be taken to determine alternate etiologies of subclinical ILD that may have been unmasked by COVID-19, rather than caused by it. It remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 could activate a latent autoimmunity or potentially cause a de novo autoimmune lung disease as has been suggested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TP31. TP031 INTERESTING CASES ASSOCIATED WITH SARS-COV-2 INFECTION\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TP31. TP031 INTERESTING CASES ASSOCIATED WITH SARS-COV-2 INFECTION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP31. TP031 INTERESTING CASES ASSOCIATED WITH SARS-COV-2 INFECTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

79岁男性,因呼吸困难和干咳就诊。5个月前,他因COVID-19和肺栓塞住院,需要2L/min的补充氧、依诺肝素、羟氯喹和瑞德西韦。他出院回家时使用阿哌沙班并补充氧气。他有每年10包的吸烟史,50年前戒了烟。他没有与肺纤维化相关的职业或环境暴露。无结缔组织病或肺纤维化家族史。体检时,他的生命体征正常,室内空气饱和度为100%。相关阳性检查结果仅限于双基底干裂纹。没有皮肤、关节或口腔发现。肺功能检查显示肺容量正常,肺活量正常,弥散能力严重下降。CT显示磨玻璃影改善,持续胸膜下网状及蜂窝状影。值得注意的是,在此评估前6年腹部CT扫描的肺下叶图像显示双基底网和磨玻璃浸润。实验室研究显示,ANA滴度呈斑点状升高,CCP升高,抗ssa52kd升高。其他自身免疫血清学结果为阴性。鉴于先前影像学中存在间质性肺异常(ILAs)和自身免疫标志物升高,我们认为该患者先前由COVID-19引起的亚临床ILD加重。COVID-19炎症反应的长期影响尚未确定。患者CT扫描的初步数据显示,高达17%的患者在病程中发生纤维化改变。是否会出现仅由COVID-19本身引起的进行性纤维化表型还有待观察。在发生急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的患者中发生H1N1和SARS-COV1暴发时曾描述过这种情况,但在其他病因引起的ARDS后肺纤维化中未观察到这种情况。区分原发ILD与covid -19后ILD的关键取决于既往病史。患者先前的x线表现符合肺间质性异常(ILA)的研究结构,即没有ILD病史的患者肺密度增加的模式。当观察到COVID-19后肺纤维化时,必须尽职调查确定亚临床ILD的其他病因,这些病因可能是由COVID-19揭示的,而不是由其引起的。目前尚不清楚SARS-CoV-2是否会激活潜在的自身免疫,还是可能像之前所建议的那样导致自身免疫性肺部疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Chicken or the Egg? Newly Diagnosed Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) After Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (COVID-19)
A 79-year-old male presented for evaluation of dyspnea and dry cough. Five months prior he was hospitalized with COVID-19 and a pulmonary embolus requiring 2L/min of supplemental oxygen, enoxaparin, hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir. He was discharged home with apixaban and supplemental oxygen. He had a 10 pack-per-year history of smoking and quit fifty years ago. He had no occupational or environmental exposures associated with pulmonary fibrosis. He had no family history of connective tissue disease or pulmonary fibrosis. On physical examination, he had normal vital signs and his saturation was 100% on room air. Pertinent positive exam findings were limited to bibasilar dry crackles. There were no skin, joint, or oral findings. Pulmonary function tests showed normal lung volumes with normal spirometry and a severely decreased diffusing capacity. A CT revealed improvement of ground glass opacities with persistent subpleural reticulations and honeycombing. Notably, lung images of the lower lobes from a CT scan of the abdomen six years prior to this evaluation showed bibasilar reticulations and ground glass infiltrates. Laboratory studies were notable for an elevated ANA titer in a speckled pattern, elevated CCP and elevated anti-SSA 52 kD. Additional autoimmune serologies were negative. Given the presence of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) in prior imaging and elevated autoimmune markers, he was deemed to have had an exacerbation of previously subclinical ILD caused by COVID-19. The long-term effects of the inflammatory response from COVID-19 have not been characterized. Initial data of CT scans in patients show that up to 17% develop fibrotic changes during the course of the disease. It remains to be seen whether there will be a progressive fibrotic phenotype solely attributable COVID-19 itself. This has been described during the H1N1 and SARS-COV1 outbreaks in patients who developed ARDS but is not observed in post-ARDS pulmonary fibrosis caused by other etiologies. The key to differentiating between a primary ILD rather than post-COVID-19 hinges on antecedent history. The patient's prior radiographic findings meet the research construct of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) which refers to patterns of increased lung density in patients with no history of ILD. When post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis is observed, due diligence must be taken to determine alternate etiologies of subclinical ILD that may have been unmasked by COVID-19, rather than caused by it. It remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 could activate a latent autoimmunity or potentially cause a de novo autoimmune lung disease as has been suggested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信