应用生物电阻抗分析和人体测量作为可互换的方法来评估运动员的身体组成。

Alisha Khan, Jyotsna Aggarwala, Meenu Dhingra
{"title":"应用生物电阻抗分析和人体测量作为可互换的方法来评估运动员的身体组成。","authors":"Alisha Khan, Jyotsna Aggarwala, Meenu Dhingra","doi":"10.7439/IJBAR.V8I11.4358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The study was conducted to find application of bioelectrical impedance analysis and anthropometry as interchangeable methods to assess body composition of sportspersons. Design: A 4 months long cross-sectional study was conducted at Sports Authority of India during pre-competition period. Method: 83 national and international level players from Sports Authority of India with age 18-25 years were selected as participants and body fat percentage was estimated using both the techniques following strict adherence to pre-measurement criteria. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all the parameters. Bland-Altman analysis was carried out to compare the methods. Result: Internal consistency of the data was confirmed by Pearsons correlation value of 0.739 at p?0.05. Mean body fat percentage from anthropometry came out to be 13.085.00 and from BIA 14.789.29. Mean difference between the body fat percent values between anthropometry and BIA was found to be 1.706.53. Limits of agreement from Bland-Altman plot were found to be clinically significant with values from -14.51 to 11.11 at 95% confidence interval suggesting large discrepancies.Discussion: Based upon the findings of the study, it is not advisable to use anthropometry and BIA as interchangeable methods of body fat estimation however results need to be validated with further studies in future. Out of the two methods, BIA involves certain pre-measurement criteria like players falling in normal BMI ranges with emptied bladder, no vigorous training and food beverage intake before assessment. As, a result the study suggests anthropometry as a preferred method for body fat estimation of sportspersons.","PeriodicalId":13848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","volume":"50 1","pages":"400-406"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of bioelectrical impedance analysis and anthropometry as interchangeable methods to assess body composition of sportspersons.\",\"authors\":\"Alisha Khan, Jyotsna Aggarwala, Meenu Dhingra\",\"doi\":\"10.7439/IJBAR.V8I11.4358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The study was conducted to find application of bioelectrical impedance analysis and anthropometry as interchangeable methods to assess body composition of sportspersons. Design: A 4 months long cross-sectional study was conducted at Sports Authority of India during pre-competition period. Method: 83 national and international level players from Sports Authority of India with age 18-25 years were selected as participants and body fat percentage was estimated using both the techniques following strict adherence to pre-measurement criteria. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all the parameters. Bland-Altman analysis was carried out to compare the methods. Result: Internal consistency of the data was confirmed by Pearsons correlation value of 0.739 at p?0.05. Mean body fat percentage from anthropometry came out to be 13.085.00 and from BIA 14.789.29. Mean difference between the body fat percent values between anthropometry and BIA was found to be 1.706.53. Limits of agreement from Bland-Altman plot were found to be clinically significant with values from -14.51 to 11.11 at 95% confidence interval suggesting large discrepancies.Discussion: Based upon the findings of the study, it is not advisable to use anthropometry and BIA as interchangeable methods of body fat estimation however results need to be validated with further studies in future. Out of the two methods, BIA involves certain pre-measurement criteria like players falling in normal BMI ranges with emptied bladder, no vigorous training and food beverage intake before assessment. As, a result the study suggests anthropometry as a preferred method for body fat estimation of sportspersons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"400-406\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V8I11.4358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V8I11.4358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨生物电阻抗分析与人体测量法在运动员身体成分评价中的应用。设计:在比赛前,在印度体育局进行了为期4个月的横断面研究。方法:83名来自印度体育局的18-25岁的国家和国际水平的运动员作为参与者,并严格遵守预测量标准,使用这两种技术估计体脂率。对所有参数进行描述性统计。采用Bland-Altman分析对两种方法进行比较。结果:pearson相关值为0.739,p?0.05,证实了数据的内部一致性。人体测量的平均体脂率为13.085.00,BIA的平均体脂率为14.789.29。人体测量与BIA体脂百分比值的平均差异为1.706.53。Bland-Altman图的一致性限具有临床意义,95%置信区间为-14.51至11.11,表明存在较大差异。讨论:基于本研究的发现,不建议将人体测量法和BIA作为体脂估计的可互换方法,但结果需要在未来的进一步研究中得到验证。在这两种方法中,BIA涉及一定的预测量标准,如运动员的BMI在正常范围内,排空膀胱,没有剧烈训练,在评估前摄入食物饮料。因此,该研究表明人体测量法是估计运动员体脂的首选方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of bioelectrical impedance analysis and anthropometry as interchangeable methods to assess body composition of sportspersons.
Objective: The study was conducted to find application of bioelectrical impedance analysis and anthropometry as interchangeable methods to assess body composition of sportspersons. Design: A 4 months long cross-sectional study was conducted at Sports Authority of India during pre-competition period. Method: 83 national and international level players from Sports Authority of India with age 18-25 years were selected as participants and body fat percentage was estimated using both the techniques following strict adherence to pre-measurement criteria. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all the parameters. Bland-Altman analysis was carried out to compare the methods. Result: Internal consistency of the data was confirmed by Pearsons correlation value of 0.739 at p?0.05. Mean body fat percentage from anthropometry came out to be 13.085.00 and from BIA 14.789.29. Mean difference between the body fat percent values between anthropometry and BIA was found to be 1.706.53. Limits of agreement from Bland-Altman plot were found to be clinically significant with values from -14.51 to 11.11 at 95% confidence interval suggesting large discrepancies.Discussion: Based upon the findings of the study, it is not advisable to use anthropometry and BIA as interchangeable methods of body fat estimation however results need to be validated with further studies in future. Out of the two methods, BIA involves certain pre-measurement criteria like players falling in normal BMI ranges with emptied bladder, no vigorous training and food beverage intake before assessment. As, a result the study suggests anthropometry as a preferred method for body fat estimation of sportspersons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信