哲学与人类学

Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares Pub Date : 2020-03-26 DOI:10.3989/RDTP.1994.V49.I2.289

F. C. Urbano

{"title":"哲学与人类学","authors":"F. C. Urbano","doi":"10.3989/RDTP.1994.V49.I2.289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is considered in this artide that, very often, the relationship between philosophy and anthropology have been analysed in a biased way. This attitude has been detrimental not only to these disciplines, but also to the philosophical anthropology, history and the epistemology of anthropology, which are the study fields where those should find their larger point of concurrence. Accordingly, we try to establish a framework of collaboration which would prove to be profitable for all of them.","PeriodicalId":30257,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares","volume":"11 1","pages":"31-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Filosofía y Antropología\",\"authors\":\"F. C. Urbano\",\"doi\":\"10.3989/RDTP.1994.V49.I2.289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is considered in this artide that, very often, the relationship between philosophy and anthropology have been analysed in a biased way. This attitude has been detrimental not only to these disciplines, but also to the philosophical anthropology, history and the epistemology of anthropology, which are the study fields where those should find their larger point of concurrence. Accordingly, we try to establish a framework of collaboration which would prove to be profitable for all of them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"31-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3989/RDTP.1994.V49.I2.289\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/RDTP.1994.V49.I2.289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为，哲学和人类学之间的关系经常以一种有偏见的方式进行分析。这种态度不仅对这些学科不利，而且对哲学人类学、历史学和人类学认识论也不利，这些都是它们应该找到更大共同点的研究领域。因此，我们试图建立一个合作框架，这将证明对他们所有人都有利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Filosofía y Antropología

It is considered in this artide that, very often, the relationship between philosophy and anthropology have been analysed in a biased way. This attitude has been detrimental not only to these disciplines, but also to the philosophical anthropology, history and the epistemology of anthropology, which are the study fields where those should find their larger point of concurrence. Accordingly, we try to establish a framework of collaboration which would prove to be profitable for all of them.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Revista de Dialectologia y Tradiciones Populares

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

48 weeks

期刊介绍： Established in 1944, Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares is presently the longest standing Spanish Journal devoted to social and cultural anthropology, publishing scholarly work on human matters such as mentalities, religion, kinship, social relationships and representations, material culture, oral literature, dialectal lexicon and all other related subjects of anthropological research. Regular sections include major Articles, Notes, Archival Documents and Book Reviews. Aimed at a learned readership, it publishes original contributions to anthropological knowledge while enriching scholarly debate, especially on theoretical and methodological questions as well as on ethnographic fieldwork.