秘鲁儿童两种龋齿风险评估工具的比较

Q4 Dentistry
Blanca Fortun-Junco, Vanessa Manrique-Flores, Rosa Muñoz-Nuñez, Ana Cupé-Araujo
{"title":"秘鲁儿童两种龋齿风险评估工具的比较","authors":"Blanca Fortun-Junco, Vanessa Manrique-Flores, Rosa Muñoz-Nuñez, Ana Cupé-Araujo","doi":"10.17126/joralres.2021.065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Caries risk assessment protocols and tools are helpful for evidence-based clinical decision making. Objective: To compare the dental caries risk using two assessment tools in Peruvian children aged 7 to 11 years. Material and Methods: : 265 children from the Educational Institution (EI) Policía Nacional del Perú Juan Ingunza Valdivia were evaluated in 2019. The tools used to compare the risk of dental caries were the Reduced Cariogram and the Biological Caries Risk. The clinical examination was performed in a single time for both tools, evaluating oral hygiene and caries experience. Results: When using both tools, it was found that each one of the age groups have a different Caries Risk distribution than the other groups and this difference is statistically significant (p=0.001). When comparing both tools, a statistically significant difference was found between their diagnoses at the moderate and high-risk levels; however, diagnoses at the low level show agreement. Conclusion: There is a difference in the assessment of the level of risk between both tools, specifically at the moderate and high levels, with most of the children assessed at low risk levels.","PeriodicalId":16625,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral Research","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of two dental caries risk assessment tools in peruvian children\",\"authors\":\"Blanca Fortun-Junco, Vanessa Manrique-Flores, Rosa Muñoz-Nuñez, Ana Cupé-Araujo\",\"doi\":\"10.17126/joralres.2021.065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Caries risk assessment protocols and tools are helpful for evidence-based clinical decision making. Objective: To compare the dental caries risk using two assessment tools in Peruvian children aged 7 to 11 years. Material and Methods: : 265 children from the Educational Institution (EI) Policía Nacional del Perú Juan Ingunza Valdivia were evaluated in 2019. The tools used to compare the risk of dental caries were the Reduced Cariogram and the Biological Caries Risk. The clinical examination was performed in a single time for both tools, evaluating oral hygiene and caries experience. Results: When using both tools, it was found that each one of the age groups have a different Caries Risk distribution than the other groups and this difference is statistically significant (p=0.001). When comparing both tools, a statistically significant difference was found between their diagnoses at the moderate and high-risk levels; however, diagnoses at the low level show agreement. Conclusion: There is a difference in the assessment of the level of risk between both tools, specifically at the moderate and high levels, with most of the children assessed at low risk levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oral Research\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oral Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2021.065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2021.065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

龋病风险评估方案和工具有助于循证临床决策。目的:比较两种评估工具对秘鲁7 ~ 11岁儿童龋齿风险的影响。材料和方法:2019年对来自Perú Juan Ingunza Valdivia国家教育机构(EI) Policía的265名儿童进行了评估。用来比较龋齿风险的工具是减少龋齿图和生物龋齿风险。两种工具的临床检查在同一时间进行,评估口腔卫生和龋齿经历。结果:使用两种工具时,发现每个年龄组的龋病风险分布与其他组不同,差异有统计学意义(p=0.001)。当比较这两种工具时,发现他们在中等和高风险水平的诊断之间存在统计学上的显著差异;然而,在低水平的诊断显示一致。结论:两种工具对风险水平的评估存在差异,特别是在中度和高水平,大多数儿童被评估为低风险水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of two dental caries risk assessment tools in peruvian children
Caries risk assessment protocols and tools are helpful for evidence-based clinical decision making. Objective: To compare the dental caries risk using two assessment tools in Peruvian children aged 7 to 11 years. Material and Methods: : 265 children from the Educational Institution (EI) Policía Nacional del Perú Juan Ingunza Valdivia were evaluated in 2019. The tools used to compare the risk of dental caries were the Reduced Cariogram and the Biological Caries Risk. The clinical examination was performed in a single time for both tools, evaluating oral hygiene and caries experience. Results: When using both tools, it was found that each one of the age groups have a different Caries Risk distribution than the other groups and this difference is statistically significant (p=0.001). When comparing both tools, a statistically significant difference was found between their diagnoses at the moderate and high-risk levels; however, diagnoses at the low level show agreement. Conclusion: There is a difference in the assessment of the level of risk between both tools, specifically at the moderate and high levels, with most of the children assessed at low risk levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Oral Research
Journal of Oral Research Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Research which is published every two month, is devoted to the dissemination of knowledge in oral and craniofacial sciences, including: oral surgery and medicine and rehabilitation, craniofacial surgery, dentistry, orofacial pain and motor disorders, head and neck surgery, speech and swallowing disorders, and other related disciplines. Journal of Oral Research publishes original research articles and brief communications, systematic reviews, study protocols, research hypotheses, reports of cases, comments and perspectives. Indexed by Scopus, DOAJ, LILACS, Latindex, IMBIOMED, DIALNET,REDIB and Google Scholar. Journal of Oral Research is a member of COPE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信