信息独特性、公司披露与信息环境

Jacky Chau
{"title":"信息独特性、公司披露与信息环境","authors":"Jacky Chau","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2753147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examines how the lack of comparable public peers (“informational uniqueness”) is related to a firm’s disclosure policy and information environment. Having less information spillover from other public firms may present an information deficiency if it is not compensated by other components of the information environment. Consistent with firms attempting to mitigate the information deficiency through strengthening their tacit commitment to continued disclosure, I find that informational uniqueness is associated with a higher propensity by firms to provide ongoing bundled guidance. Overall, I find a strong negative relationship between informational uniqueness and the quality of corporate information environment only among firms without regular bundled guidance. This suggests that, while informational uniqueness can generate significant information deficiency, firms with strong tacit disclosure commitment are able to largely compensate for the lack of information spillover from peers.","PeriodicalId":80976,"journal":{"name":"Comparative labor law journal : a publication of the U.S. National Branch of the International Society for Labor Law and Social Security [and] the Wharton School, and the Law School of the University of Pennsylvania","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informational Uniqueness, Corporate Disclosure, and Information Environment\",\"authors\":\"Jacky Chau\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2753147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study examines how the lack of comparable public peers (“informational uniqueness”) is related to a firm’s disclosure policy and information environment. Having less information spillover from other public firms may present an information deficiency if it is not compensated by other components of the information environment. Consistent with firms attempting to mitigate the information deficiency through strengthening their tacit commitment to continued disclosure, I find that informational uniqueness is associated with a higher propensity by firms to provide ongoing bundled guidance. Overall, I find a strong negative relationship between informational uniqueness and the quality of corporate information environment only among firms without regular bundled guidance. This suggests that, while informational uniqueness can generate significant information deficiency, firms with strong tacit disclosure commitment are able to largely compensate for the lack of information spillover from peers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":80976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative labor law journal : a publication of the U.S. National Branch of the International Society for Labor Law and Social Security [and] the Wharton School, and the Law School of the University of Pennsylvania\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative labor law journal : a publication of the U.S. National Branch of the International Society for Labor Law and Social Security [and] the Wharton School, and the Law School of the University of Pennsylvania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2753147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative labor law journal : a publication of the U.S. National Branch of the International Society for Labor Law and Social Security [and] the Wharton School, and the Law School of the University of Pennsylvania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2753147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究考察了缺乏可比较的公众同行(“信息独特性”)与公司披露政策和信息环境之间的关系。来自其他上市公司的信息外溢较少,如果没有得到信息环境的其他组成部分的补偿,可能会出现信息不足。与公司试图通过加强他们对持续披露的默示承诺来减轻信息不足相一致,我发现信息独特性与公司提供持续捆绑指导的更高倾向相关。总体而言,我发现只有在没有定期捆绑指导的公司中,信息独特性与企业信息环境质量之间存在强烈的负相关关系。这表明,虽然信息独特性会产生显著的信息不足,但具有较强隐性披露承诺的企业能够在很大程度上弥补同行信息溢出的不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informational Uniqueness, Corporate Disclosure, and Information Environment
The study examines how the lack of comparable public peers (“informational uniqueness”) is related to a firm’s disclosure policy and information environment. Having less information spillover from other public firms may present an information deficiency if it is not compensated by other components of the information environment. Consistent with firms attempting to mitigate the information deficiency through strengthening their tacit commitment to continued disclosure, I find that informational uniqueness is associated with a higher propensity by firms to provide ongoing bundled guidance. Overall, I find a strong negative relationship between informational uniqueness and the quality of corporate information environment only among firms without regular bundled guidance. This suggests that, while informational uniqueness can generate significant information deficiency, firms with strong tacit disclosure commitment are able to largely compensate for the lack of information spillover from peers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信