改进深度感测球形压痕试验中塑性区半径测量的拉伸性能计算方法

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Tairui Zhang, Jianxun Li, Xun Sun, Xiandong Shang, Weiqiang Wang
{"title":"改进深度感测球形压痕试验中塑性区半径测量的拉伸性能计算方法","authors":"Tairui Zhang, Jianxun Li, Xun Sun, Xiandong Shang, Weiqiang Wang","doi":"10.1177/03093247211043982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Depth-sensing spherical indentation tests (SITs) have been widely used in tensile property calculations, but the accuracy and reproducibility of calculations may be significantly influenced by displacement measurement errors. Taking two representative tensile property calculation methods as examples, namely the analytical and numerical methods, the rationale as to why accurate and reproducible tensile property calculations cannot be expected from the depth-sensing SITs was discussed in detail. Subsequently, the proportional limit σ0 calculation from plastic zone radius rp measurements, which was analytically developed in the expanding cavity model (ECM) and experimentally measured by digital image correlation (DIC), was introduced to enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of the two representative methods. Principles for setting the strain threshold εth were established, and factors influencing the σ0 calculation from rp measurements were investigated through the optical system, the friction condition, the hardening behaviors of specimen materials, and the indentation depth. Through finite element calculations, it was proven that tensile property calculations at the existence of displacement measurement errors, particularly the constant error from the origin correction, can be significantly improved with the introduction of rp measurements. Similar findings were also observed in experiments on four metals that exhibited different hardening behaviors.","PeriodicalId":50038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the tensile property calculations with plastic zone radius measurements in depth-sensing spherical indentation tests\",\"authors\":\"Tairui Zhang, Jianxun Li, Xun Sun, Xiandong Shang, Weiqiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03093247211043982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Depth-sensing spherical indentation tests (SITs) have been widely used in tensile property calculations, but the accuracy and reproducibility of calculations may be significantly influenced by displacement measurement errors. Taking two representative tensile property calculation methods as examples, namely the analytical and numerical methods, the rationale as to why accurate and reproducible tensile property calculations cannot be expected from the depth-sensing SITs was discussed in detail. Subsequently, the proportional limit σ0 calculation from plastic zone radius rp measurements, which was analytically developed in the expanding cavity model (ECM) and experimentally measured by digital image correlation (DIC), was introduced to enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of the two representative methods. Principles for setting the strain threshold εth were established, and factors influencing the σ0 calculation from rp measurements were investigated through the optical system, the friction condition, the hardening behaviors of specimen materials, and the indentation depth. Through finite element calculations, it was proven that tensile property calculations at the existence of displacement measurement errors, particularly the constant error from the origin correction, can be significantly improved with the introduction of rp measurements. Similar findings were also observed in experiments on four metals that exhibited different hardening behaviors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03093247211043982\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03093247211043982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

深度传感球形压痕试验(sit)在拉伸性能计算中得到了广泛的应用,但位移测量误差会显著影响计算的准确性和再现性。以解析法和数值法两种具有代表性的拉伸性能计算方法为例,详细讨论了深度传感sit无法准确再现拉伸性能计算的基本原理。在此基础上,通过扩展腔模型(ECM)解析推导和数字图像相关(DIC)实验测量的塑性区半径rp的比例极限σ0计算,提高了两种代表性方法的精度和再现性。建立了应变阈值εth的设定原则,并从光学系统、摩擦条件、试样材料的硬化行为和压痕深度等方面研究了rp测量结果中σ0的影响因素。通过有限元计算证明,引入rp测量后,存在位移测量误差的拉伸性能计算,特别是原点校正的恒定误差可以得到显著改善。在四种表现出不同硬化行为的金属的实验中也观察到类似的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the tensile property calculations with plastic zone radius measurements in depth-sensing spherical indentation tests
Depth-sensing spherical indentation tests (SITs) have been widely used in tensile property calculations, but the accuracy and reproducibility of calculations may be significantly influenced by displacement measurement errors. Taking two representative tensile property calculation methods as examples, namely the analytical and numerical methods, the rationale as to why accurate and reproducible tensile property calculations cannot be expected from the depth-sensing SITs was discussed in detail. Subsequently, the proportional limit σ0 calculation from plastic zone radius rp measurements, which was analytically developed in the expanding cavity model (ECM) and experimentally measured by digital image correlation (DIC), was introduced to enhance the accuracy and reproducibility of the two representative methods. Principles for setting the strain threshold εth were established, and factors influencing the σ0 calculation from rp measurements were investigated through the optical system, the friction condition, the hardening behaviors of specimen materials, and the indentation depth. Through finite element calculations, it was proven that tensile property calculations at the existence of displacement measurement errors, particularly the constant error from the origin correction, can be significantly improved with the introduction of rp measurements. Similar findings were also observed in experiments on four metals that exhibited different hardening behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design
Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design 工程技术-材料科学:表征与测试
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Strain Analysis for Engineering Design provides a forum for work relating to the measurement and analysis of strain that is appropriate to engineering design and practice. "Since launching in 1965, The Journal of Strain Analysis has been a collegiate effort, dedicated to providing exemplary service to our authors. We welcome contributions related to analytical, experimental, and numerical techniques for the analysis and/or measurement of stress and/or strain, or studies of relevant material properties and failure modes. Our international Editorial Board contains experts in all of these fields and is keen to encourage papers on novel techniques and innovative applications." Professor Eann Patterson - University of Liverpool, UK This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信