“事物开始自己说话”:皮埃尔·谢弗的贝壳神话和声音的认识论

IF 0.4 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Iain Campbell
{"title":"“事物开始自己说话”:皮埃尔·谢弗的贝壳神话和声音的认识论","authors":"Iain Campbell","doi":"10.1080/20551940.2020.1831803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper considers the role of myth and phenomenology in Pierre Schaeffer’s research into music and sound, and argues that engagement with these themes allows us to rethink the legacy and contemporary value of Schaeffer’s thought in sound studies. In light of critique of Schaeffer’s project, in particular that developed by Brian Kane and Schaeffer’s own apparent self-disavowal, this paper returns to Schaeffer’s early remarks on the “myth of the seashell” in order to examine the conditions of this critique. While Kane argues that Schaeffer’s recourse to myth, coupled with his adoption of Husserlian phenomenology, leads to a closure of his inquiry and a failure to accommodate the contingency of his position, this paper argues that Schaeffer’s myth of the seashell brings into focus an open-ended, motivating phenomenological problem concerning subjectivity and objectivity that runs through his thought. Drawing on the philosophical work of Gaston Bachelard and Gilles Deleuze, this paper considers the epistemological significance of this moment in Schaeffer’s thought, suggesting a “problematic” account of the myth of the seashell that puts Schaeffer into conversation with contemporary work in epistemology.","PeriodicalId":53207,"journal":{"name":"Sound Studies","volume":"4 1","pages":"100 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Things begin to speak by themselves”: Pierre Schaeffer’s myth of the seashell and the epistemology of sound\",\"authors\":\"Iain Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20551940.2020.1831803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper considers the role of myth and phenomenology in Pierre Schaeffer’s research into music and sound, and argues that engagement with these themes allows us to rethink the legacy and contemporary value of Schaeffer’s thought in sound studies. In light of critique of Schaeffer’s project, in particular that developed by Brian Kane and Schaeffer’s own apparent self-disavowal, this paper returns to Schaeffer’s early remarks on the “myth of the seashell” in order to examine the conditions of this critique. While Kane argues that Schaeffer’s recourse to myth, coupled with his adoption of Husserlian phenomenology, leads to a closure of his inquiry and a failure to accommodate the contingency of his position, this paper argues that Schaeffer’s myth of the seashell brings into focus an open-ended, motivating phenomenological problem concerning subjectivity and objectivity that runs through his thought. Drawing on the philosophical work of Gaston Bachelard and Gilles Deleuze, this paper considers the epistemological significance of this moment in Schaeffer’s thought, suggesting a “problematic” account of the myth of the seashell that puts Schaeffer into conversation with contemporary work in epistemology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sound Studies\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"100 - 118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sound Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2020.1831803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sound Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20551940.2020.1831803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了神话和现象学在皮埃尔·谢弗的音乐和声音研究中的作用,并认为与这些主题的接触使我们能够重新思考谢弗思想在声音研究中的遗产和当代价值。鉴于对谢弗计划的批评,特别是布莱恩·凯恩所提出的批评,以及谢弗本人明显的自我否定,本文回到谢弗早期对“贝壳神话”的评论,以考察这种批评的条件。凯恩认为,谢弗对神话的求助,加上他对胡塞尔现象学的采用,导致了他的探究的终结,并未能适应他的立场的偶然性,而本文认为,谢弗的贝壳神话带来了一个开放性的、激励性的现象学问题,这个问题涉及贯穿他思想的主体性和客观性。借鉴加斯顿·巴舍拉和吉尔·德勒兹的哲学著作,本文考虑了谢弗思想中这一时刻的认识论意义,提出了对贝壳神话的“有问题的”描述,使谢弗与当代认识论工作进行了对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Things begin to speak by themselves”: Pierre Schaeffer’s myth of the seashell and the epistemology of sound
ABSTRACT This paper considers the role of myth and phenomenology in Pierre Schaeffer’s research into music and sound, and argues that engagement with these themes allows us to rethink the legacy and contemporary value of Schaeffer’s thought in sound studies. In light of critique of Schaeffer’s project, in particular that developed by Brian Kane and Schaeffer’s own apparent self-disavowal, this paper returns to Schaeffer’s early remarks on the “myth of the seashell” in order to examine the conditions of this critique. While Kane argues that Schaeffer’s recourse to myth, coupled with his adoption of Husserlian phenomenology, leads to a closure of his inquiry and a failure to accommodate the contingency of his position, this paper argues that Schaeffer’s myth of the seashell brings into focus an open-ended, motivating phenomenological problem concerning subjectivity and objectivity that runs through his thought. Drawing on the philosophical work of Gaston Bachelard and Gilles Deleuze, this paper considers the epistemological significance of this moment in Schaeffer’s thought, suggesting a “problematic” account of the myth of the seashell that puts Schaeffer into conversation with contemporary work in epistemology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sound Studies
Sound Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信