糖尿病和非糖尿病老年人心肌梗死的危险因素、患病率、治疗类型和死亡率的比较:一项队列研究

IF 0.9 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Parisa Janjani, Yaser Salehabadi, Sayeh Motevaseli, Reza Heidari Moghadam, S. Siabani, N. Salehi
{"title":"糖尿病和非糖尿病老年人心肌梗死的危险因素、患病率、治疗类型和死亡率的比较:一项队列研究","authors":"Parisa Janjani, Yaser Salehabadi, Sayeh Motevaseli, Reza Heidari Moghadam, S. Siabani, N. Salehi","doi":"10.32598/sija.2022.3091.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives Older diabetic patients with myocardial infarction (MI) are vulnerable group. This study aims to compare the prevalence of risk factors, type of reperfusion therapy, and mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic elderly with MI. Methods & Materials This is a cohort study. The statistical population consists of all older adults (age ≥60 years), whose information was available in the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) registry system of Imam Ali hospital in Kermanshah, Iran from July 2016 to January 2020. Of these, 1460 participants with STEMI were selected based on the inclusion criteria and divided into two diabetic and non-diabetic groups. Their information was recorded by trained nurses using a checklist surveying demographic information, medical records, cardiovascular disease risk factors, clinical and diagnostic tests, type of treatment, and death at the time of admission, hospitalization and discharge. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney and chi-square test in Stata software, version 14. P<0.05 was considered as significant level. Results The number of diabetic women (47.11%) was significantly higher than the number of those without diabetes (25.60%) (P<0.001). The mean LDL and cholesterol levels in non-diabetics was significantly higher than diabetics (P<0.001). The mean HDL was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.777). The number of patients with BMI≥30, history of myocardial infarction, blood lipid, hypertension, triglyceride level, and glomerular filtration rate <60 were significantly higher in the diabetic group than in the non-diabetic group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the variables of place of residence, literacy level, smoking, history of stroke, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery. In addition, there was no significant difference in mortality rate and type of reperfusion treatment between the two groups. Conclusion Some of risk factors for MI are different between diabetic and non-diabetic elderly with MI. The results of this study can provide useful information to experts in this field to develop lifestyle modification programs by making drug prescription more purposeful and providing awareness for this group of patients.","PeriodicalId":44423,"journal":{"name":"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Risk Factors, Prevalence, Type of Treatment, and Mortality Rate for Myocardial Infarction in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Older Adults: A Cohort Study\",\"authors\":\"Parisa Janjani, Yaser Salehabadi, Sayeh Motevaseli, Reza Heidari Moghadam, S. Siabani, N. Salehi\",\"doi\":\"10.32598/sija.2022.3091.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives Older diabetic patients with myocardial infarction (MI) are vulnerable group. This study aims to compare the prevalence of risk factors, type of reperfusion therapy, and mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic elderly with MI. Methods & Materials This is a cohort study. The statistical population consists of all older adults (age ≥60 years), whose information was available in the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) registry system of Imam Ali hospital in Kermanshah, Iran from July 2016 to January 2020. Of these, 1460 participants with STEMI were selected based on the inclusion criteria and divided into two diabetic and non-diabetic groups. Their information was recorded by trained nurses using a checklist surveying demographic information, medical records, cardiovascular disease risk factors, clinical and diagnostic tests, type of treatment, and death at the time of admission, hospitalization and discharge. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney and chi-square test in Stata software, version 14. P<0.05 was considered as significant level. Results The number of diabetic women (47.11%) was significantly higher than the number of those without diabetes (25.60%) (P<0.001). The mean LDL and cholesterol levels in non-diabetics was significantly higher than diabetics (P<0.001). The mean HDL was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.777). The number of patients with BMI≥30, history of myocardial infarction, blood lipid, hypertension, triglyceride level, and glomerular filtration rate <60 were significantly higher in the diabetic group than in the non-diabetic group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the variables of place of residence, literacy level, smoking, history of stroke, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery. In addition, there was no significant difference in mortality rate and type of reperfusion treatment between the two groups. Conclusion Some of risk factors for MI are different between diabetic and non-diabetic elderly with MI. The results of this study can provide useful information to experts in this field to develop lifestyle modification programs by making drug prescription more purposeful and providing awareness for this group of patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.2022.3091.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.2022.3091.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的老年糖尿病合并心肌梗死(MI)患者是易感人群。本研究旨在比较糖尿病和非糖尿病老年心肌梗死的危险因素、再灌注治疗类型和死亡率。方法与材料本研究为队列研究。统计人群包括所有年龄≥60岁的老年人,其信息可在2016年7月至2020年1月伊朗Kermanshah伊玛目阿里医院st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)登记系统中获得。其中,根据纳入标准选择1460名STEMI患者,分为糖尿病组和非糖尿病组。他们的信息由训练有素的护士记录,使用核对表调查人口统计信息、医疗记录、心血管疾病风险因素、临床和诊断测试、治疗类型以及入院、住院和出院时的死亡情况。数据分析采用描述性统计、独立t检验、Mann-Whitney检验和卡方检验,采用Stata软件版本14。P<0.05为显著水平。结果女性糖尿病患者人数(47.11%)明显高于非糖尿病患者人数(25.60%)(P<0.001)。非糖尿病患者的平均LDL和胆固醇水平显著高于糖尿病患者(P<0.001)。两组患者HDL均值差异无统计学意义(P=0.777)。糖尿病组BMI≥30、心肌梗死史、血脂、高血压、甘油三酯水平、肾小球滤过率<60的患者数量明显高于非糖尿病组。两组在居住地、文化水平、吸烟、卒中史、冠状动脉成形术、冠状动脉搭桥手术等变量上差异无统计学意义。此外,两组在死亡率和再灌注治疗方式上无显著差异。结论糖尿病老年心肌梗死与非糖尿病老年心肌梗死的危险因素存在差异,本研究结果可为该领域的专家制定生活方式改变方案提供有用信息,使药物处方更具目的性,并提高这类患者的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Risk Factors, Prevalence, Type of Treatment, and Mortality Rate for Myocardial Infarction in Diabetic and Non-diabetic Older Adults: A Cohort Study
Objectives Older diabetic patients with myocardial infarction (MI) are vulnerable group. This study aims to compare the prevalence of risk factors, type of reperfusion therapy, and mortality in diabetic and non-diabetic elderly with MI. Methods & Materials This is a cohort study. The statistical population consists of all older adults (age ≥60 years), whose information was available in the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) registry system of Imam Ali hospital in Kermanshah, Iran from July 2016 to January 2020. Of these, 1460 participants with STEMI were selected based on the inclusion criteria and divided into two diabetic and non-diabetic groups. Their information was recorded by trained nurses using a checklist surveying demographic information, medical records, cardiovascular disease risk factors, clinical and diagnostic tests, type of treatment, and death at the time of admission, hospitalization and discharge. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, Mann-Whitney and chi-square test in Stata software, version 14. P<0.05 was considered as significant level. Results The number of diabetic women (47.11%) was significantly higher than the number of those without diabetes (25.60%) (P<0.001). The mean LDL and cholesterol levels in non-diabetics was significantly higher than diabetics (P<0.001). The mean HDL was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.777). The number of patients with BMI≥30, history of myocardial infarction, blood lipid, hypertension, triglyceride level, and glomerular filtration rate <60 were significantly higher in the diabetic group than in the non-diabetic group. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the variables of place of residence, literacy level, smoking, history of stroke, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery. In addition, there was no significant difference in mortality rate and type of reperfusion treatment between the two groups. Conclusion Some of risk factors for MI are different between diabetic and non-diabetic elderly with MI. The results of this study can provide useful information to experts in this field to develop lifestyle modification programs by making drug prescription more purposeful and providing awareness for this group of patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing
Salmand-Iranian Journal of Ageing GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
18.20%
发文量
20
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信