三种站场养鱼技术的经济评价

F. Amevenku, F. Attipoe
{"title":"三种站场养鱼技术的经济评价","authors":"F. Amevenku, F. Attipoe","doi":"10.4314/JAST.V15I1-2.54841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The economic viability of three aquaculture research technologies was examined to determine the operational profitability in Ghana. The first technology was aimed at producing improved tilapia strain fish seed as input for fish farming, while the second dealt with integrating poultry with fish farming for harnessing synergies of waste recycling and feeding cost reduction. The third technology involved polyculture of fish utilizing the natu-ral feed available to different trophic types of fish within a communal culture environment. While the technolo-gies were considered to be socially desirable that could ensure efficiency in use of resources, screening on-station was germane in technology transfer. Undiscounted profit, rate of return, return on annual operation cost, benefit-cost ratio, return to management, and land were adopted as indicators for assessing viability of the tech-nologies and approaches that could improve profitability. At rate of return of 29.8 %, return on annual operation cost of 43.9 %, benefit-cost ratio of 1.7 and return to management and land of 71.2 %, the communal culture technology involving tilapia-mullet-prawn-catfish gave positive indicator values, but the risk of survival of the species in the culture medium must be minimized. Sensitivity analyses of making gains at the same levels of costs for the other two technologies showed that an eight-fold increase of revenue would be required for the poultry-fish integration model to be viable, while a three-fold increase of revenue would be required for the via-bility of fish seed production. Since the three technologies address different challenges of fish farming, all could be recommended for implementation, with the proviso of maximizing incomes from sales of produce, reducing costs of inputs, and minimizing risks.","PeriodicalId":9207,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Applied Science and Technology","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic evaluation of three on-station fish farming technologies\",\"authors\":\"F. Amevenku, F. Attipoe\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/JAST.V15I1-2.54841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The economic viability of three aquaculture research technologies was examined to determine the operational profitability in Ghana. The first technology was aimed at producing improved tilapia strain fish seed as input for fish farming, while the second dealt with integrating poultry with fish farming for harnessing synergies of waste recycling and feeding cost reduction. The third technology involved polyculture of fish utilizing the natu-ral feed available to different trophic types of fish within a communal culture environment. While the technolo-gies were considered to be socially desirable that could ensure efficiency in use of resources, screening on-station was germane in technology transfer. Undiscounted profit, rate of return, return on annual operation cost, benefit-cost ratio, return to management, and land were adopted as indicators for assessing viability of the tech-nologies and approaches that could improve profitability. At rate of return of 29.8 %, return on annual operation cost of 43.9 %, benefit-cost ratio of 1.7 and return to management and land of 71.2 %, the communal culture technology involving tilapia-mullet-prawn-catfish gave positive indicator values, but the risk of survival of the species in the culture medium must be minimized. Sensitivity analyses of making gains at the same levels of costs for the other two technologies showed that an eight-fold increase of revenue would be required for the poultry-fish integration model to be viable, while a three-fold increase of revenue would be required for the via-bility of fish seed production. Since the three technologies address different challenges of fish farming, all could be recommended for implementation, with the proviso of maximizing incomes from sales of produce, reducing costs of inputs, and minimizing risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Applied Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Applied Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/JAST.V15I1-2.54841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Applied Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JAST.V15I1-2.54841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对三种水产养殖研究技术的经济可行性进行了审查,以确定加纳的业务盈利能力。第一项技术旨在生产改良罗非鱼品种的鱼种,作为养鱼业的投入物,而第二项技术涉及将家禽与养鱼业结合起来,利用废物回收和降低饲养成本的协同效应。第三种技术涉及在公共养殖环境中利用不同营养类型的鱼类可用的天然饲料进行鱼类混养。虽然人们认为这些技术在社会上是可取的,可以确保资源的有效利用,但现场筛选与技术转让是密切相关的。采用未贴现利润、回报率、年度运营成本回报率、效益成本比、管理回报率和土地作为评估技术和方法可行性的指标,以提高盈利能力。罗非鱼-鲻鱼-对虾-鲶鱼群落养殖技术的收益率为29.8%,年运营成本收益率为43.9%,效益成本比为1.7,管理和土地收益为71.2%,具有良好的指标值,但必须尽量降低该物种在培养基中的生存风险。对其他两种技术在相同成本水平上取得收益的敏感性分析表明,家禽-鱼类一体化模式要可行,需要收入增加8倍,而鱼类种子生产的可行性则需要收入增加3倍。由于这三种技术解决了鱼类养殖的不同挑战,因此都可以推荐实施,但附带条件是最大限度地提高产品销售收入,降低投入成本,并最大限度地降低风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic evaluation of three on-station fish farming technologies
The economic viability of three aquaculture research technologies was examined to determine the operational profitability in Ghana. The first technology was aimed at producing improved tilapia strain fish seed as input for fish farming, while the second dealt with integrating poultry with fish farming for harnessing synergies of waste recycling and feeding cost reduction. The third technology involved polyculture of fish utilizing the natu-ral feed available to different trophic types of fish within a communal culture environment. While the technolo-gies were considered to be socially desirable that could ensure efficiency in use of resources, screening on-station was germane in technology transfer. Undiscounted profit, rate of return, return on annual operation cost, benefit-cost ratio, return to management, and land were adopted as indicators for assessing viability of the tech-nologies and approaches that could improve profitability. At rate of return of 29.8 %, return on annual operation cost of 43.9 %, benefit-cost ratio of 1.7 and return to management and land of 71.2 %, the communal culture technology involving tilapia-mullet-prawn-catfish gave positive indicator values, but the risk of survival of the species in the culture medium must be minimized. Sensitivity analyses of making gains at the same levels of costs for the other two technologies showed that an eight-fold increase of revenue would be required for the poultry-fish integration model to be viable, while a three-fold increase of revenue would be required for the via-bility of fish seed production. Since the three technologies address different challenges of fish farming, all could be recommended for implementation, with the proviso of maximizing incomes from sales of produce, reducing costs of inputs, and minimizing risks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信