Jian Wang, Lijun Hu, Boyu Yu, Jingping Yu, Lili Wang, X. Ni, Q. Meng, Zhiqiang Sun, Jianlin Wang, B. Nie
{"title":"调强放疗联合近距离放疗422例宫颈癌患者不良事件及预后分析","authors":"Jian Wang, Lijun Hu, Boyu Yu, Jingping Yu, Lili Wang, X. Ni, Q. Meng, Zhiqiang Sun, Jianlin Wang, B. Nie","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the adverse events and efficacy in cervical cancer patients receiving intensity modulated radiationtherapy (IMRT) plusbrachytherapy with or without chemotherapy, and to indentify the factors that may affect the prognosis. \n \n \nMethods \nIn this retrospective analysis, we analyzed the clinical and follow-up data of the 422 cervical cancer patients, who received IMRT plus brachytherapy with or without chemotherapy.Among these patients, 353 cases received concurrent chemoradiotherapy and the other 69 cases received radiotherapy alone. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to calculate the overall survival (OS) rates. Log-rank-test and Cox regression were performed to executing the univariate and multivariate analysis of the OS, respectively. \n \n \nResults \nThe rate of complete response (CR) in the patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy was significantly higher than that of the patients who received single radiotherapy (77.6% vs. 65.2%, χ2=4.812, P 0.05). The OS for the patients receiving prophylactic extended field irradiation of the PALN was higher than that of patients without prophylactic radiation (χ2=3.953, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nCervical cancer patients receiving IMRT plus brachytherapy with or without chemotherapy had achieved promising prognosis. Prophylactic extended field irradiation of the PALN contributed to the improved OS in the patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis. FIGO staging, pathology type, lymph node metastasis, radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy or not, and short-term efficiency were independent factors for the prognosis. \n \n \nKey words: \nCervical cancer; Radiotherapy; Brachytherapy; Chemotherapy; Prognosis","PeriodicalId":36403,"journal":{"name":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","volume":"45 1","pages":"807-812"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse events and prognosis analysis in 422 cervical cancer patients after intensity modulated radiation therapy combined with brachytherapy\",\"authors\":\"Jian Wang, Lijun Hu, Boyu Yu, Jingping Yu, Lili Wang, X. Ni, Q. Meng, Zhiqiang Sun, Jianlin Wang, B. Nie\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the adverse events and efficacy in cervical cancer patients receiving intensity modulated radiationtherapy (IMRT) plusbrachytherapy with or without chemotherapy, and to indentify the factors that may affect the prognosis. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nIn this retrospective analysis, we analyzed the clinical and follow-up data of the 422 cervical cancer patients, who received IMRT plus brachytherapy with or without chemotherapy.Among these patients, 353 cases received concurrent chemoradiotherapy and the other 69 cases received radiotherapy alone. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to calculate the overall survival (OS) rates. Log-rank-test and Cox regression were performed to executing the univariate and multivariate analysis of the OS, respectively. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe rate of complete response (CR) in the patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy was significantly higher than that of the patients who received single radiotherapy (77.6% vs. 65.2%, χ2=4.812, P 0.05). The OS for the patients receiving prophylactic extended field irradiation of the PALN was higher than that of patients without prophylactic radiation (χ2=3.953, P<0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nCervical cancer patients receiving IMRT plus brachytherapy with or without chemotherapy had achieved promising prognosis. Prophylactic extended field irradiation of the PALN contributed to the improved OS in the patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis. FIGO staging, pathology type, lymph node metastasis, radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy or not, and short-term efficiency were independent factors for the prognosis. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nCervical cancer; Radiotherapy; Brachytherapy; Chemotherapy; Prognosis\",\"PeriodicalId\":36403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"807-812\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华放射医学与防护杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.11.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华放射医学与防护杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.0254-5098.2019.11.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的探讨宫颈癌调强放疗(IMRT)加近距离放疗伴或不伴化疗的不良事件及疗效,探讨影响预后的因素。方法回顾性分析422例宫颈癌患者的临床及随访资料,分别采用IMRT +近距离放疗,伴或不伴化疗。其中同步放化疗353例,单独放疗69例。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算总生存率。采用log -rank检验和Cox回归分别对OS进行单因素和多因素分析。结果同步放化疗患者的完全缓解率(CR)显著高于单纯放化疗患者(77.6% vs. 65.2%, χ2=4.812, p0.05)。接受PALN预防性大范围放疗的患者OS高于未接受预防性放疗的患者(χ2=3.953, P<0.05)。结论宫颈癌放疗加近距离放疗伴或不伴化疗预后良好。盆腔淋巴结转移患者对PALN进行预防性扩大野照射可改善OS。FIGO分期、病理类型、淋巴结转移、是否放化疗、短期疗效是影响预后的独立因素。关键词:宫颈癌;放射治疗;近距离放射疗法;化疗;预后
Adverse events and prognosis analysis in 422 cervical cancer patients after intensity modulated radiation therapy combined with brachytherapy
Objective
To investigate the adverse events and efficacy in cervical cancer patients receiving intensity modulated radiationtherapy (IMRT) plusbrachytherapy with or without chemotherapy, and to indentify the factors that may affect the prognosis.
Methods
In this retrospective analysis, we analyzed the clinical and follow-up data of the 422 cervical cancer patients, who received IMRT plus brachytherapy with or without chemotherapy.Among these patients, 353 cases received concurrent chemoradiotherapy and the other 69 cases received radiotherapy alone. Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to calculate the overall survival (OS) rates. Log-rank-test and Cox regression were performed to executing the univariate and multivariate analysis of the OS, respectively.
Results
The rate of complete response (CR) in the patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy was significantly higher than that of the patients who received single radiotherapy (77.6% vs. 65.2%, χ2=4.812, P 0.05). The OS for the patients receiving prophylactic extended field irradiation of the PALN was higher than that of patients without prophylactic radiation (χ2=3.953, P<0.05).
Conclusions
Cervical cancer patients receiving IMRT plus brachytherapy with or without chemotherapy had achieved promising prognosis. Prophylactic extended field irradiation of the PALN contributed to the improved OS in the patients with pelvic lymph node metastasis. FIGO staging, pathology type, lymph node metastasis, radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy or not, and short-term efficiency were independent factors for the prognosis.
Key words:
Cervical cancer; Radiotherapy; Brachytherapy; Chemotherapy; Prognosis