性别薪酬差距,英国经验:我们如何缩小差距,我们如何将研究成果付诸实践?

Duncan Brown
{"title":"性别薪酬差距,英国经验:我们如何缩小差距,我们如何将研究成果付诸实践?","authors":"Duncan Brown","doi":"10.1177/0886368719895934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2017, the U.K. government enacted legislation making it compulsory for employers across all sectors with more than 250 employees to report six gender pay gap statistics on a consistent basis, with the majority adding voluntary explanatory reports. Over 10,000 have reported in each of the 2 years since, pushing the issue significantly higher up both corporate boardroom and academic research agendas. In this article, after briefly explaining the national and legislative context, the author profiles the action plans which U.K. employers have published designed to close these gaps, focusing on higher education institutions. The author goes on to profile the research on what works in closing gaps and highlights the significant dissonance between the two perspectives. Employer actions tend to focus narrowly on training and other “soft” involuntary initiatives, while the academic research highlights a multipronged approach across all areas of human resources activity as most effective and including compulsory actions such as “blind” recruitment. The author concludes by outlining how these two perspectives may be integrated to produce more relevant research and evidence-based practice, thereby driving more significant and sustainable reductions in gender pay gaps.","PeriodicalId":79838,"journal":{"name":"Compensation and benefits review","volume":"1 1","pages":"144 - 161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Pay Gaps, the U.K. Experience: How Do We Close Them, How Do We Bring Research Into Practice?\",\"authors\":\"Duncan Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0886368719895934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2017, the U.K. government enacted legislation making it compulsory for employers across all sectors with more than 250 employees to report six gender pay gap statistics on a consistent basis, with the majority adding voluntary explanatory reports. Over 10,000 have reported in each of the 2 years since, pushing the issue significantly higher up both corporate boardroom and academic research agendas. In this article, after briefly explaining the national and legislative context, the author profiles the action plans which U.K. employers have published designed to close these gaps, focusing on higher education institutions. The author goes on to profile the research on what works in closing gaps and highlights the significant dissonance between the two perspectives. Employer actions tend to focus narrowly on training and other “soft” involuntary initiatives, while the academic research highlights a multipronged approach across all areas of human resources activity as most effective and including compulsory actions such as “blind” recruitment. The author concludes by outlining how these two perspectives may be integrated to produce more relevant research and evidence-based practice, thereby driving more significant and sustainable reductions in gender pay gaps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Compensation and benefits review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"144 - 161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Compensation and benefits review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368719895934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compensation and benefits review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0886368719895934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

2017年,英国政府颁布了一项立法,要求员工人数超过250人的所有行业的雇主都必须定期报告六项性别薪酬差距统计数据,其中大多数雇主都增加了自愿解释性报告。自那以后的两年里,每年都有超过1万份报告,将这个问题推到了公司董事会和学术研究议程的更高位置。在这篇文章中,在简要解释了国家和立法背景之后,作者介绍了英国雇主发布的旨在缩小这些差距的行动计划,重点是高等教育机构。作者接着概述了关于如何缩小差距的研究,并强调了两种观点之间的重大不协调。雇主的行动往往局限于培训和其他“软”非自愿举措,而学术研究强调,在人力资源活动的所有领域采取多管齐下的方法是最有效的,其中包括“盲目”招聘等强制性行动。作者最后概述了如何将这两种观点整合起来,以产生更相关的研究和基于证据的实践,从而推动更显著和可持续的性别薪酬差距缩小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender Pay Gaps, the U.K. Experience: How Do We Close Them, How Do We Bring Research Into Practice?
In 2017, the U.K. government enacted legislation making it compulsory for employers across all sectors with more than 250 employees to report six gender pay gap statistics on a consistent basis, with the majority adding voluntary explanatory reports. Over 10,000 have reported in each of the 2 years since, pushing the issue significantly higher up both corporate boardroom and academic research agendas. In this article, after briefly explaining the national and legislative context, the author profiles the action plans which U.K. employers have published designed to close these gaps, focusing on higher education institutions. The author goes on to profile the research on what works in closing gaps and highlights the significant dissonance between the two perspectives. Employer actions tend to focus narrowly on training and other “soft” involuntary initiatives, while the academic research highlights a multipronged approach across all areas of human resources activity as most effective and including compulsory actions such as “blind” recruitment. The author concludes by outlining how these two perspectives may be integrated to produce more relevant research and evidence-based practice, thereby driving more significant and sustainable reductions in gender pay gaps.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信