总统营销:国事访问的贸易促进效应

IF 1.9 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Eugene Beaulieu, Zeng Lian, Shan Wan
{"title":"总统营销:国事访问的贸易促进效应","authors":"Eugene Beaulieu, Zeng Lian, Shan Wan","doi":"10.1080/1226508X.2020.1792329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper studies the trade promotion effects of state visits paid by Chinese political leaders by analyzing China’s trade flow with 184 countries between 1998 and 2014. International events are used to instrument state visits. The results find that trade promotion effects come two years after the visits. Moreover, the promotion effects are biased towards the industries and firms with connections to the government. Trade barriers offset the promotion effects of state visits.","PeriodicalId":45235,"journal":{"name":"Global Economic Review","volume":"99 1","pages":"309 - 327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Presidential Marketing: Trade Promotion Effects of State Visits\",\"authors\":\"Eugene Beaulieu, Zeng Lian, Shan Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1226508X.2020.1792329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper studies the trade promotion effects of state visits paid by Chinese political leaders by analyzing China’s trade flow with 184 countries between 1998 and 2014. International events are used to instrument state visits. The results find that trade promotion effects come two years after the visits. Moreover, the promotion effects are biased towards the industries and firms with connections to the government. Trade barriers offset the promotion effects of state visits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Economic Review\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"309 - 327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Economic Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2020.1792329\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2020.1792329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要本文通过分析1998 - 2014年中国与184个国家的贸易流量,研究了中国政治领导人国事访问的贸易促进效应。国际活动被用作国事访问的工具。结果发现,贸易促进效应在访问两年后才会显现。此外,促进效应偏向于与政府有联系的行业和企业。贸易壁垒抵消了国事访问的促进作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Presidential Marketing: Trade Promotion Effects of State Visits
ABSTRACT This paper studies the trade promotion effects of state visits paid by Chinese political leaders by analyzing China’s trade flow with 184 countries between 1998 and 2014. International events are used to instrument state visits. The results find that trade promotion effects come two years after the visits. Moreover, the promotion effects are biased towards the industries and firms with connections to the government. Trade barriers offset the promotion effects of state visits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信