Shaili Jain, Deborah Nazarian, J. Weitlauf, S. Lindley
{"title":"当代创伤后应激障碍治疗和研究中的生物伦理问题综述:考虑未来实证伦理调查的优先事项","authors":"Shaili Jain, Deborah Nazarian, J. Weitlauf, S. Lindley","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2011.629640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The last decade has seen a surge in biomedical research advancing the evidence base for the effective clinical management and study of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The authors review the literature describing ethical issues in conducting PTSD research; controversies over the role of preventive pharmacotherapy for PTSD; and ethical quandaries in the identification, treatment, or empirical investigation of PTSD in postdisaster settings. Findings are synthesized within an ethics framework that utilizes major constructs in the biomedical literature: beneficence/nonmaleficence, informed consent, and autonomy. Gaps and weaknesses in the current evidence base are highlighted. The authors conclude by considering priorities for future empirical ethics investigation in this field.","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"20 1","pages":"26 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overview of Bioethical Issues in Contemporary PTSD Treatment and Research: Considering Priorities for Future Empirical Ethics Investigation\",\"authors\":\"Shaili Jain, Deborah Nazarian, J. Weitlauf, S. Lindley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21507716.2011.629640\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The last decade has seen a surge in biomedical research advancing the evidence base for the effective clinical management and study of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The authors review the literature describing ethical issues in conducting PTSD research; controversies over the role of preventive pharmacotherapy for PTSD; and ethical quandaries in the identification, treatment, or empirical investigation of PTSD in postdisaster settings. Findings are synthesized within an ethics framework that utilizes major constructs in the biomedical literature: beneficence/nonmaleficence, informed consent, and autonomy. Gaps and weaknesses in the current evidence base are highlighted. The authors conclude by considering priorities for future empirical ethics investigation in this field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"26 - 32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.629640\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.629640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Overview of Bioethical Issues in Contemporary PTSD Treatment and Research: Considering Priorities for Future Empirical Ethics Investigation
The last decade has seen a surge in biomedical research advancing the evidence base for the effective clinical management and study of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The authors review the literature describing ethical issues in conducting PTSD research; controversies over the role of preventive pharmacotherapy for PTSD; and ethical quandaries in the identification, treatment, or empirical investigation of PTSD in postdisaster settings. Findings are synthesized within an ethics framework that utilizes major constructs in the biomedical literature: beneficence/nonmaleficence, informed consent, and autonomy. Gaps and weaknesses in the current evidence base are highlighted. The authors conclude by considering priorities for future empirical ethics investigation in this field.