“这个荒谬剧场的意义是什么?”苏联后期的公开羞辱会议

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
позднем Ссср, Светлана Стивенсон
{"title":"“这个荒谬剧场的意义是什么?”苏联后期的公开羞辱会议","authors":"позднем Ссср, Светлана Стивенсон","doi":"10.58186/2782-3660-2022-2-5-15-40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, we have seen a resurgence in the practice of public branding, a process in which members of a society express moral indignation at the views or behavior of an individual or a group. This stigmatization is especially common on social media, but it can also take other forms (meetings of Academic Councils and ethics commissions, the so-called cancel culture, and so on). The splitting of the public into opposing groups, the fury of the accusations, the severe consequences of stigmatization for social status, the reputation of a person, the often revealed interest of the state and certain institutions in unleashing or using stigmatization — all this makes it an important phenomenon of modern public life. Stephenson’s article examines the practice of prorabotka, a ritual of public shaming that took place in schools, universities and workplaces in the Soviet Union. It argues that rather than being events dedicated to moral improvement and re-education of individuals by the collectives (as they were seen in the official discourse), these were repressive rituals that led to social degradation of the victims of shaming. It shows that in addition to an official script, the meetings had a supplementary script that unleashed negative moral emotions and affects but also generated guilt and fear.","PeriodicalId":41258,"journal":{"name":"Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“What Was the Meaning of This Theatre of Absurdity” Public Shaming Meetings in the Late USSR\",\"authors\":\"позднем Ссср, Светлана Стивенсон\",\"doi\":\"10.58186/2782-3660-2022-2-5-15-40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, we have seen a resurgence in the practice of public branding, a process in which members of a society express moral indignation at the views or behavior of an individual or a group. This stigmatization is especially common on social media, but it can also take other forms (meetings of Academic Councils and ethics commissions, the so-called cancel culture, and so on). The splitting of the public into opposing groups, the fury of the accusations, the severe consequences of stigmatization for social status, the reputation of a person, the often revealed interest of the state and certain institutions in unleashing or using stigmatization — all this makes it an important phenomenon of modern public life. Stephenson’s article examines the practice of prorabotka, a ritual of public shaming that took place in schools, universities and workplaces in the Soviet Union. It argues that rather than being events dedicated to moral improvement and re-education of individuals by the collectives (as they were seen in the official discourse), these were repressive rituals that led to social degradation of the victims of shaming. It shows that in addition to an official script, the meetings had a supplementary script that unleashed negative moral emotions and affects but also generated guilt and fear.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58186/2782-3660-2022-2-5-15-40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58186/2782-3660-2022-2-5-15-40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,我们看到了公共品牌实践的复苏,这是一个社会成员对个人或团体的观点或行为表达道德愤慨的过程。这种污名化在社交媒体上尤为普遍,但它也可以采取其他形式(学术委员会和道德委员会的会议,所谓的取消文化,等等)。公众分裂成对立的团体,指责的愤怒,污名化对社会地位和个人声誉的严重后果,国家和某些机构在释放或使用污名化方面经常暴露出的利益-所有这些都使其成为现代公共生活的重要现象。斯蒂芬森的文章考察了前苏联在学校、大学和工作场所进行的一种公开羞辱仪式——proabotka的做法。它认为,这些不是集体致力于道德提高和个人再教育的事件(正如他们在官方话语中看到的那样),而是导致羞辱受害者社会堕落的压抑仪式。研究表明,除了正式的会议脚本,会议还有一个辅助脚本,它释放了负面的道德情绪和影响,但也产生了内疚和恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“What Was the Meaning of This Theatre of Absurdity” Public Shaming Meetings in the Late USSR
In recent years, we have seen a resurgence in the practice of public branding, a process in which members of a society express moral indignation at the views or behavior of an individual or a group. This stigmatization is especially common on social media, but it can also take other forms (meetings of Academic Councils and ethics commissions, the so-called cancel culture, and so on). The splitting of the public into opposing groups, the fury of the accusations, the severe consequences of stigmatization for social status, the reputation of a person, the often revealed interest of the state and certain institutions in unleashing or using stigmatization — all this makes it an important phenomenon of modern public life. Stephenson’s article examines the practice of prorabotka, a ritual of public shaming that took place in schools, universities and workplaces in the Soviet Union. It argues that rather than being events dedicated to moral improvement and re-education of individuals by the collectives (as they were seen in the official discourse), these were repressive rituals that led to social degradation of the victims of shaming. It shows that in addition to an official script, the meetings had a supplementary script that unleashed negative moral emotions and affects but also generated guilt and fear.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici
Versus-Quaderni di Studi Semiotici HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信