Agnès Pérez-Millan, Laia Borrell, José Contador, M. Balasa, A. Lladó, R. Sánchez-Valle, R. Sala‐Llonch
{"title":"使用单一神经影像学特征对早发性阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆进行分类","authors":"Agnès Pérez-Millan, Laia Borrell, José Contador, M. Balasa, A. Lladó, R. Sánchez-Valle, R. Sala‐Llonch","doi":"10.1117/12.2632990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (EOAD, <65 years) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) are common forms of early-onset dementia. Therefore, there is a need to establish accurate diagnosis and to obtain markers for disease tracking. We combined supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) to discriminate between EOAD and FTD patients. METHODS: We included 3T-T1 MRI of 203 subjects under 65 years old: 66 healthy controls (CTR, age: 55.0 ± 8.4 years), 85 EOAD patients (age: 57.3 ± 6.1 years) and 52 FTD patients (age: 57.9 ± 4.8 years). We obtained subcortical gray matter volumes and cortical thickness (CTh) regional measures using FreeSurfer. For ML, we performed a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of all volumes and CTh values. Then, the first principal component (PC) was introduced into a Support Vector Machine (SVM). Overall performance was assessed using k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Our algorithm had an accuracy of 87.2 ± 14.2 % in the CTR vs EOAD classification, 80.8 ± 20.4% for CTR vs FTD, 66.5 ± 12.9 % for EOAD vs FTD and 65.2 ± 10.6% when discriminating the three groups. We used the weights of the first PC to create disease-specific patterns. CONCLUSION: By using a single feature that combines information from CTh and subcortical volumes, our algorithm classifies CTR, EOAD and FTD with good accuracy. We suggest that this approach can be used as a feature reduction strategy in ML algorithms while providing interpretable atrophy patterns.","PeriodicalId":13820,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)","volume":"71 1","pages":"122040D - 122040D-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classification between early onset Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia using a single neuroimaging feature\",\"authors\":\"Agnès Pérez-Millan, Laia Borrell, José Contador, M. Balasa, A. Lladó, R. Sánchez-Valle, R. Sala‐Llonch\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2632990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (EOAD, <65 years) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) are common forms of early-onset dementia. Therefore, there is a need to establish accurate diagnosis and to obtain markers for disease tracking. We combined supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) to discriminate between EOAD and FTD patients. METHODS: We included 3T-T1 MRI of 203 subjects under 65 years old: 66 healthy controls (CTR, age: 55.0 ± 8.4 years), 85 EOAD patients (age: 57.3 ± 6.1 years) and 52 FTD patients (age: 57.9 ± 4.8 years). We obtained subcortical gray matter volumes and cortical thickness (CTh) regional measures using FreeSurfer. For ML, we performed a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of all volumes and CTh values. Then, the first principal component (PC) was introduced into a Support Vector Machine (SVM). Overall performance was assessed using k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Our algorithm had an accuracy of 87.2 ± 14.2 % in the CTR vs EOAD classification, 80.8 ± 20.4% for CTR vs FTD, 66.5 ± 12.9 % for EOAD vs FTD and 65.2 ± 10.6% when discriminating the three groups. We used the weights of the first PC to create disease-specific patterns. CONCLUSION: By using a single feature that combines information from CTh and subcortical volumes, our algorithm classifies CTR, EOAD and FTD with good accuracy. We suggest that this approach can be used as a feature reduction strategy in ML algorithms while providing interpretable atrophy patterns.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"122040D - 122040D-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2632990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Nanoscience, Engineering and Technology (ICONSET 2011)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2632990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Classification between early onset Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia using a single neuroimaging feature
INTRODUCTION: Early Onset Alzheimer’s Disease (EOAD, <65 years) and Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD) are common forms of early-onset dementia. Therefore, there is a need to establish accurate diagnosis and to obtain markers for disease tracking. We combined supervised and unsupervised machine learning (ML) to discriminate between EOAD and FTD patients. METHODS: We included 3T-T1 MRI of 203 subjects under 65 years old: 66 healthy controls (CTR, age: 55.0 ± 8.4 years), 85 EOAD patients (age: 57.3 ± 6.1 years) and 52 FTD patients (age: 57.9 ± 4.8 years). We obtained subcortical gray matter volumes and cortical thickness (CTh) regional measures using FreeSurfer. For ML, we performed a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of all volumes and CTh values. Then, the first principal component (PC) was introduced into a Support Vector Machine (SVM). Overall performance was assessed using k-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: Our algorithm had an accuracy of 87.2 ± 14.2 % in the CTR vs EOAD classification, 80.8 ± 20.4% for CTR vs FTD, 66.5 ± 12.9 % for EOAD vs FTD and 65.2 ± 10.6% when discriminating the three groups. We used the weights of the first PC to create disease-specific patterns. CONCLUSION: By using a single feature that combines information from CTh and subcortical volumes, our algorithm classifies CTR, EOAD and FTD with good accuracy. We suggest that this approach can be used as a feature reduction strategy in ML algorithms while providing interpretable atrophy patterns.