{"title":"从印度西部拉杰科特三级医疗医院的不同临床样本中分离出的金黄色葡萄球菌诱导克林霉素耐药的流行情况","authors":"N. Daftary, K. Mehta","doi":"10.9735/0975-5276.10.4.1152-1154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a problem worldwide. This has led to renewed interest in usage of Macrolide-LincosamideStreptogramin B (MLSB) antibiotics to treat Staphylococcal infections. The resistance to macrolide can be mediated by msr A gene coding for efflux mechanism or via erm genes. In vitro tests for clindamycin susceptibility may fail to detect inducible clindamycin resistance thus necessitating the need to detect such resistance by a simple D test on a routine basis. Methodology: 300 S. aureus isolates were subjected to routine antibiotic susceptibility testing including cefoxitin (30ug) by modified Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. Erythromycin Inducible resistance to clindamycin in S. aureus was tested by “D test” as per CLSI guidelines. Results: Out of the 300 isolates; MS phenotype (MS Pheno) was seen in 10.3% (31) Erythromycin Inducible Clindamycin Resistance (iMLSb) is seen in 19% (58), constitutional (cMLSb) resistance was seen in 12% (36). Out of the total 58 Erythromycin Inducible Resistance Isolates, 63.79% (37) were associated with MRSA and 36.20% (21) were associated with MSSA. Conclusion: Clindamycin is kept as a reserve drug and is usually advocated in severe MRSA infections. This study showed that D test shoul d be used mandatorily in routine disc diffusion test to detect inducible clindamycin resistance in S. aureus for optimum treatment of patients. KeywordsClindamycin resistance, Constitutive MLSB, inducible MLSB, MS MLSB, MRSA","PeriodicalId":92914,"journal":{"name":"International journal of microbiology and current research","volume":"81 1","pages":"1152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PREVALENCE OF INDUCIBLE CLINDAMYCIN RESISTANCE IN Staphylococcus aureus ISOLATED FROM VARIOUS CLINICAL SAMPLES AT TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL, RAJKOT, WESTERN INDIA\",\"authors\":\"N. Daftary, K. Mehta\",\"doi\":\"10.9735/0975-5276.10.4.1152-1154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a problem worldwide. This has led to renewed interest in usage of Macrolide-LincosamideStreptogramin B (MLSB) antibiotics to treat Staphylococcal infections. The resistance to macrolide can be mediated by msr A gene coding for efflux mechanism or via erm genes. In vitro tests for clindamycin susceptibility may fail to detect inducible clindamycin resistance thus necessitating the need to detect such resistance by a simple D test on a routine basis. Methodology: 300 S. aureus isolates were subjected to routine antibiotic susceptibility testing including cefoxitin (30ug) by modified Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. Erythromycin Inducible resistance to clindamycin in S. aureus was tested by “D test” as per CLSI guidelines. Results: Out of the 300 isolates; MS phenotype (MS Pheno) was seen in 10.3% (31) Erythromycin Inducible Clindamycin Resistance (iMLSb) is seen in 19% (58), constitutional (cMLSb) resistance was seen in 12% (36). Out of the total 58 Erythromycin Inducible Resistance Isolates, 63.79% (37) were associated with MRSA and 36.20% (21) were associated with MSSA. Conclusion: Clindamycin is kept as a reserve drug and is usually advocated in severe MRSA infections. This study showed that D test shoul d be used mandatorily in routine disc diffusion test to detect inducible clindamycin resistance in S. aureus for optimum treatment of patients. KeywordsClindamycin resistance, Constitutive MLSB, inducible MLSB, MS MLSB, MRSA\",\"PeriodicalId\":92914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of microbiology and current research\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"1152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of microbiology and current research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9735/0975-5276.10.4.1152-1154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of microbiology and current research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9735/0975-5276.10.4.1152-1154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:耐多药金黄色葡萄球菌是一个世界性的问题。这导致了使用大环内酯-林科胺链状gramin B (MLSB)抗生素治疗葡萄球菌感染的新兴趣。大环内酯耐药可通过编码外排机制的msr A基因介导,也可通过erm基因介导。克林霉素敏感性的体外试验可能无法检测到可诱导的克林霉素耐药性,因此需要在常规基础上通过简单的D试验检测这种耐药性。方法:采用改良Kirby Bauer圆盘扩散法对300株金黄色葡萄球菌进行常规药敏试验,包括头孢西丁(30ug)。根据CLSI指南,采用“D试验”检测金黄色葡萄球菌对克林霉素的诱导耐药。结果:300株分离菌中;MS表型(MS Pheno)占10.3%(31),红霉素诱导克林霉素耐药(iMLSb)占19%(58),体质(cMLSb)耐药占12%(36)。58株红霉素诱导耐药菌株中,有37株(63.79%)与MRSA相关,21株(36.20%)与MSSA相关。结论:克林霉素在重症MRSA感染中可作为备用药物使用。本研究提示,常规盘片扩散试验中应强制采用D试验检测金黄色葡萄球菌诱导克林霉素耐药,以优化患者的治疗。关键词:克林霉素耐药,组成型MLSB,诱导型MLSB, MS MLSB, MRSA
PREVALENCE OF INDUCIBLE CLINDAMYCIN RESISTANCE IN Staphylococcus aureus ISOLATED FROM VARIOUS CLINICAL SAMPLES AT TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL, RAJKOT, WESTERN INDIA
Background: Multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a problem worldwide. This has led to renewed interest in usage of Macrolide-LincosamideStreptogramin B (MLSB) antibiotics to treat Staphylococcal infections. The resistance to macrolide can be mediated by msr A gene coding for efflux mechanism or via erm genes. In vitro tests for clindamycin susceptibility may fail to detect inducible clindamycin resistance thus necessitating the need to detect such resistance by a simple D test on a routine basis. Methodology: 300 S. aureus isolates were subjected to routine antibiotic susceptibility testing including cefoxitin (30ug) by modified Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. Erythromycin Inducible resistance to clindamycin in S. aureus was tested by “D test” as per CLSI guidelines. Results: Out of the 300 isolates; MS phenotype (MS Pheno) was seen in 10.3% (31) Erythromycin Inducible Clindamycin Resistance (iMLSb) is seen in 19% (58), constitutional (cMLSb) resistance was seen in 12% (36). Out of the total 58 Erythromycin Inducible Resistance Isolates, 63.79% (37) were associated with MRSA and 36.20% (21) were associated with MSSA. Conclusion: Clindamycin is kept as a reserve drug and is usually advocated in severe MRSA infections. This study showed that D test shoul d be used mandatorily in routine disc diffusion test to detect inducible clindamycin resistance in S. aureus for optimum treatment of patients. KeywordsClindamycin resistance, Constitutive MLSB, inducible MLSB, MS MLSB, MRSA