1型糖尿病儿童每日1次与每日2次注射地特米胰岛素的比较

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS
A. Setoodeh, A. Rabbani, F. Sayarifard, Z. Haghshenas, A. Sayarifard, P. Rostami, F. Abbasi, Mohadeseh Bayat, S. Amini, R. Tavakolizadeh
{"title":"1型糖尿病儿童每日1次与每日2次注射地特米胰岛素的比较","authors":"A. Setoodeh, A. Rabbani, F. Sayarifard, Z. Haghshenas, A. Sayarifard, P. Rostami, F. Abbasi, Mohadeseh Bayat, S. Amini, R. Tavakolizadeh","doi":"10.5812/ijp-116461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of once-daily versus twice-daily insulin detemir injection in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods: In this randomized 4-month clinical trial, 60 children aged 33 - 156 months with T1DM were randomly assigned into two groups, once-daily (group 1) and twice-daily (group 2) detemir insulin injection with pre-meal insulin Aspart. The first month of the study was devoted to educating the patients and insulin dose titration. Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) measured at the end of the first month and again after the fourth month was considered as the outcome. Hypoglycemia as one of the major complications was defined as blood glucose lower than 70 mg/dL with clinical symptoms or blood glucose lower than 50 mg/dL in the absence of clinical symptoms. Results: Mean HbA1C in the fourth month was 8.5% ± 1% in group 1 and 8.5% ± 1.1% in group 2 (P = 0.98). Mean changes in the fourth month compared to baseline were -0.09% (95% CI: -0.47 - 0.3) in group 1, and -0.42% (95% CI: -0.94 - 0.09) in group 2 (P = 0.273). The treatment modification rate was 39% and 15% in groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.02). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of insulin dose, hypoglycemia, and other complications. Conclusions: Twice-daily injections did not change HbA1c in comparison with once-daily injections. However, the lower treatment modification rate in the twice-daily group in the age group of our study was considerable.","PeriodicalId":14593,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Once-daily versus Twice-daily Injection of Insulin Detemir in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus\",\"authors\":\"A. Setoodeh, A. Rabbani, F. Sayarifard, Z. Haghshenas, A. Sayarifard, P. Rostami, F. Abbasi, Mohadeseh Bayat, S. Amini, R. Tavakolizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ijp-116461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of once-daily versus twice-daily insulin detemir injection in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods: In this randomized 4-month clinical trial, 60 children aged 33 - 156 months with T1DM were randomly assigned into two groups, once-daily (group 1) and twice-daily (group 2) detemir insulin injection with pre-meal insulin Aspart. The first month of the study was devoted to educating the patients and insulin dose titration. Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) measured at the end of the first month and again after the fourth month was considered as the outcome. Hypoglycemia as one of the major complications was defined as blood glucose lower than 70 mg/dL with clinical symptoms or blood glucose lower than 50 mg/dL in the absence of clinical symptoms. Results: Mean HbA1C in the fourth month was 8.5% ± 1% in group 1 and 8.5% ± 1.1% in group 2 (P = 0.98). Mean changes in the fourth month compared to baseline were -0.09% (95% CI: -0.47 - 0.3) in group 1, and -0.42% (95% CI: -0.94 - 0.09) in group 2 (P = 0.273). The treatment modification rate was 39% and 15% in groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.02). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of insulin dose, hypoglycemia, and other complications. Conclusions: Twice-daily injections did not change HbA1c in comparison with once-daily injections. However, the lower treatment modification rate in the twice-daily group in the age group of our study was considerable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp-116461\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ijp-116461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是比较1型糖尿病(T1DM)患儿每日1次与每日2次地特米胰岛素注射的疗效。方法:在为期4个月的随机临床试验中,将60例33 ~ 156个月的T1DM患儿随机分为每日1次(组1)和每日2次(组2)地替米特胰岛素注射加餐前胰岛素阿斯帕特。研究的第一个月致力于对患者进行教育和胰岛素剂量滴定。第一个月末和第四个月后再次测量血红蛋白A1C (HbA1C)作为结果。低血糖作为主要并发症之一定义为血糖低于70 mg/dL且有临床症状或血糖低于50 mg/dL而无临床症状。结果:1组患者第4个月平均HbA1C为8.5%±1%,2组患者平均HbA1C为8.5%±1.1% (P = 0.98)。第4个月与基线相比,组1的平均变化为-0.09% (95% CI: -0.47 - 0.3),组2的平均变化为-0.42% (95% CI: -0.94 -0.09) (P = 0.273)。1、2组治疗改良率分别为39%、15% (P = 0.02)。然而,两组在胰岛素剂量、低血糖和其他并发症方面没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:与每日一次注射相比,每日两次注射没有改变HbA1c。然而,在我们研究的年龄组中,每日两次组的治疗改良率较低是相当可观的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Once-daily versus Twice-daily Injection of Insulin Detemir in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of once-daily versus twice-daily insulin detemir injection in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Methods: In this randomized 4-month clinical trial, 60 children aged 33 - 156 months with T1DM were randomly assigned into two groups, once-daily (group 1) and twice-daily (group 2) detemir insulin injection with pre-meal insulin Aspart. The first month of the study was devoted to educating the patients and insulin dose titration. Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) measured at the end of the first month and again after the fourth month was considered as the outcome. Hypoglycemia as one of the major complications was defined as blood glucose lower than 70 mg/dL with clinical symptoms or blood glucose lower than 50 mg/dL in the absence of clinical symptoms. Results: Mean HbA1C in the fourth month was 8.5% ± 1% in group 1 and 8.5% ± 1.1% in group 2 (P = 0.98). Mean changes in the fourth month compared to baseline were -0.09% (95% CI: -0.47 - 0.3) in group 1, and -0.42% (95% CI: -0.94 - 0.09) in group 2 (P = 0.273). The treatment modification rate was 39% and 15% in groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.02). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of insulin dose, hypoglycemia, and other complications. Conclusions: Twice-daily injections did not change HbA1c in comparison with once-daily injections. However, the lower treatment modification rate in the twice-daily group in the age group of our study was considerable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Pediatrics (Iran J Pediatr) is a peer-reviewed medical publication. The purpose of Iran J Pediatr is to increase knowledge, stimulate research in all fields of Pediatrics, and promote better management of pediatric patients. To achieve the goals, the journal publishes basic, biomedical, and clinical investigations on prevalent diseases relevant to pediatrics. The acceptance criteria for all papers are the quality and originality of the research and their significance to our readership. Except where otherwise stated, manuscripts are peer-reviewed by minimum three anonymous reviewers. The Editorial Board reserves the right to refuse any material for publication and advises that authors should retain copies of submitted manuscripts and correspondence as the material cannot be returned. Final acceptance or rejection rests with the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信