应用作者的手法治疗肩关节脱位的效果

M. A. Slabospitskii, Dmitrii Ye. Mokhov, A. N. Tkachenko
{"title":"应用作者的手法治疗肩关节脱位的效果","authors":"M. A. Slabospitskii, Dmitrii Ye. Mokhov, A. N. Tkachenko","doi":"10.17816/mechnikov108430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Shoulder joint dislocation is the most frequent among all types of dislocations. There are many ways to correct a dislocation of the shoulder. There are many ways to reduce a dislocated shoulder in both outpatient and inpatient settings. The results of conservative treatment of patients with shoulder dislocation are not always positive. \nAIM: To analyze the results of the authors manual technique for repositioning shoulder dislocation. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted from 2013 to 2020 inclusive with unselected sampling; the study base is the trauma center of the City Hospital No. 1 by N.I. Pirogov. Criteria for including the patients in the study primary dislocation of the shoulder. Diagnosis: Closed traumatic dislocation of the shoulder in total 1968 people. Non-inclusion criteria secondary dislocation. In the outpatient setting, successful reduction of the shoulder was carried out in 1159 (58.9%) patients; after unsuccessful reduction, 809 (41.1%) patients were hospitalized with shoulder dislocation. The outpatient patients were randomly divided into two groups: in group 1 (n = 1552) the shoulders were adjusted using traditional methods with local anesthesia, the patients in group 2 (n = 416) received treatment according to the authors manual technique without local anesthesia. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, and type of dislocation in both groups. \nRESULTS: The use of manual techniques was effective in 85% of the cases (352 people), 64 people were hospitalized (15%). The effectiveness of using traditional methods with the use of local anesthesia was 52% (dislocation was repositioned in 807 patients), the rest of the patients were treated in the inpatient setting. \nCONCLUSIONS: The use of the authors manual technique in patients with shoulder dislocation in the outpatient setting has higher efficiency compared to traditional methods due to the fact that more patients receive assistance in the outpatient setting. In addition, this type of treatment is carried out without anesthesia, which also reduces the cost of treatment.","PeriodicalId":12949,"journal":{"name":"HERALD of North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of applying author’s manual method for repositioning shoulder dislocation\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Slabospitskii, Dmitrii Ye. Mokhov, A. N. Tkachenko\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/mechnikov108430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Shoulder joint dislocation is the most frequent among all types of dislocations. There are many ways to correct a dislocation of the shoulder. There are many ways to reduce a dislocated shoulder in both outpatient and inpatient settings. The results of conservative treatment of patients with shoulder dislocation are not always positive. \\nAIM: To analyze the results of the authors manual technique for repositioning shoulder dislocation. \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted from 2013 to 2020 inclusive with unselected sampling; the study base is the trauma center of the City Hospital No. 1 by N.I. Pirogov. Criteria for including the patients in the study primary dislocation of the shoulder. Diagnosis: Closed traumatic dislocation of the shoulder in total 1968 people. Non-inclusion criteria secondary dislocation. In the outpatient setting, successful reduction of the shoulder was carried out in 1159 (58.9%) patients; after unsuccessful reduction, 809 (41.1%) patients were hospitalized with shoulder dislocation. The outpatient patients were randomly divided into two groups: in group 1 (n = 1552) the shoulders were adjusted using traditional methods with local anesthesia, the patients in group 2 (n = 416) received treatment according to the authors manual technique without local anesthesia. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, and type of dislocation in both groups. \\nRESULTS: The use of manual techniques was effective in 85% of the cases (352 people), 64 people were hospitalized (15%). The effectiveness of using traditional methods with the use of local anesthesia was 52% (dislocation was repositioned in 807 patients), the rest of the patients were treated in the inpatient setting. \\nCONCLUSIONS: The use of the authors manual technique in patients with shoulder dislocation in the outpatient setting has higher efficiency compared to traditional methods due to the fact that more patients receive assistance in the outpatient setting. In addition, this type of treatment is carried out without anesthesia, which also reduces the cost of treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HERALD of North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HERALD of North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/mechnikov108430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HERALD of North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/mechnikov108430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:肩关节脱位是所有类型脱位中最常见的。矫正肩关节脱臼有很多方法。有许多方法来减少脱臼的肩膀在门诊和住院设置。肩关节脱位患者保守治疗的结果并不总是积极的。目的:分析手手法治疗肩关节脱位的效果。材料与方法:研究时间为2013年至2020年(含未选择样本);研究基地是N.I. Pirogov市第一医院的创伤中心。纳入原发性肩关节脱位患者的研究标准。诊断:闭合性外伤性肩关节脱位共1968例。未包含标准继发性脱位。在门诊,1159例(58.9%)患者成功完成肩关节复位;复位失败后,809例(41.1%)患者因肩关节脱位住院。将门诊患者随机分为两组:1组(n = 1552)采用传统方法在局麻下调整肩部,2组(n = 416)采用作者手工手法在非局麻下调整肩部。两组患者的性别、年龄、脱位类型差异无统计学意义。结果:手工手法治疗有效率85%(352例),住院64例(15%)。传统方法加局部麻醉的有效性为52%(807例脱位复位),其余患者在住院治疗。结论:由于更多的患者在门诊接受帮助,在门诊使用作者的手法治疗肩关节脱位患者比传统方法具有更高的效率。此外,这种治疗不需要麻醉,这也降低了治疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Results of applying author’s manual method for repositioning shoulder dislocation
BACKGROUND: Shoulder joint dislocation is the most frequent among all types of dislocations. There are many ways to correct a dislocation of the shoulder. There are many ways to reduce a dislocated shoulder in both outpatient and inpatient settings. The results of conservative treatment of patients with shoulder dislocation are not always positive. AIM: To analyze the results of the authors manual technique for repositioning shoulder dislocation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted from 2013 to 2020 inclusive with unselected sampling; the study base is the trauma center of the City Hospital No. 1 by N.I. Pirogov. Criteria for including the patients in the study primary dislocation of the shoulder. Diagnosis: Closed traumatic dislocation of the shoulder in total 1968 people. Non-inclusion criteria secondary dislocation. In the outpatient setting, successful reduction of the shoulder was carried out in 1159 (58.9%) patients; after unsuccessful reduction, 809 (41.1%) patients were hospitalized with shoulder dislocation. The outpatient patients were randomly divided into two groups: in group 1 (n = 1552) the shoulders were adjusted using traditional methods with local anesthesia, the patients in group 2 (n = 416) received treatment according to the authors manual technique without local anesthesia. There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, and type of dislocation in both groups. RESULTS: The use of manual techniques was effective in 85% of the cases (352 people), 64 people were hospitalized (15%). The effectiveness of using traditional methods with the use of local anesthesia was 52% (dislocation was repositioned in 807 patients), the rest of the patients were treated in the inpatient setting. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the authors manual technique in patients with shoulder dislocation in the outpatient setting has higher efficiency compared to traditional methods due to the fact that more patients receive assistance in the outpatient setting. In addition, this type of treatment is carried out without anesthesia, which also reduces the cost of treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信