儿童置PEG后早期和延迟喂养的耐受性和并发症发生率的比较。

Jacquelin Peck, Katie Mills, A. Dey, A. T. Nguyen, E. Amankwah, Alexander Wilsey, Emily Swan, Sorany Son, Sara Karjoo, D. McClenathan, M. Wilsey
{"title":"儿童置PEG后早期和延迟喂养的耐受性和并发症发生率的比较。","authors":"Jacquelin Peck, Katie Mills, A. Dey, A. T. Nguyen, E. Amankwah, Alexander Wilsey, Emily Swan, Sorany Son, Sara Karjoo, D. McClenathan, M. Wilsey","doi":"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Enteral nutrition is commonly initiated 24-hours after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children. Adult studies report safe refeeding within 1-6 hours of PEG and these findings have been cautiously applied to children. However, comparative studies assessing early vs next-day refeeding in children are currently lacking. This study evaluates feeding tolerance and complications following early vs. next-day refeeding in children. METHODS This is a single-center, pre-post study. In June 2015 our clinical practice changed to begin refeeding within 6-hours of PEG. Children receiving early refeeding from December 2015 to August 2017 were included. A retrospective cohort from February 2013 to April 2015 was used for comparison. RESULTS 46 children received early refeeding after PEG and 37 received next-day refeeding. Gender distribution was similar in the two groups. Early refeeding patients were slightly older (3.5 vs. 2.2 years) and heavier (15.5 kg vs. 11.5 kg) at PEG placement compared to next-day refeeding patients. Early Refeeding patients experienced greater post-procedural nausea and/or vomiting (19% vs 8%, p < 0.001) and leakage, irritation, and infection around the stoma (19% vs 0.0%, p < 0.001). Compared to Early Refeeders, Next-Day Refeeding patients experienced higher occurrence of fever (35% vs 13%, p = 0.021), longer nutritional disruption (24.6 vs 3.7 hours, p < 0.001) and longer length of stay (51 vs. 27 hours; p < 0.001). One Next-Day-Refeeding patient experienced peritonitis. One Early Refeeding patient experienced cellulitis requiring hospitalization and a second experienced gastrostomy tube migration into the peritoneal cavity requiring removal. CONCLUSION Early Refeeders experienced higher rates of post-procedural nausea or vomiting and irritation, leakage or infection around the stoma; but experienced lower rates of post-operative fever. Early refeeding resulted in reduced nutritional interruption and hospital length of stay.","PeriodicalId":16725,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Tolerance and Complication Rates between Early and Delayed Feeding after PEG Placement in Children.\",\"authors\":\"Jacquelin Peck, Katie Mills, A. Dey, A. T. Nguyen, E. Amankwah, Alexander Wilsey, Emily Swan, Sorany Son, Sara Karjoo, D. McClenathan, M. Wilsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MPG.0000000000002503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND Enteral nutrition is commonly initiated 24-hours after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children. Adult studies report safe refeeding within 1-6 hours of PEG and these findings have been cautiously applied to children. However, comparative studies assessing early vs next-day refeeding in children are currently lacking. This study evaluates feeding tolerance and complications following early vs. next-day refeeding in children. METHODS This is a single-center, pre-post study. In June 2015 our clinical practice changed to begin refeeding within 6-hours of PEG. Children receiving early refeeding from December 2015 to August 2017 were included. A retrospective cohort from February 2013 to April 2015 was used for comparison. RESULTS 46 children received early refeeding after PEG and 37 received next-day refeeding. Gender distribution was similar in the two groups. Early refeeding patients were slightly older (3.5 vs. 2.2 years) and heavier (15.5 kg vs. 11.5 kg) at PEG placement compared to next-day refeeding patients. Early Refeeding patients experienced greater post-procedural nausea and/or vomiting (19% vs 8%, p < 0.001) and leakage, irritation, and infection around the stoma (19% vs 0.0%, p < 0.001). Compared to Early Refeeders, Next-Day Refeeding patients experienced higher occurrence of fever (35% vs 13%, p = 0.021), longer nutritional disruption (24.6 vs 3.7 hours, p < 0.001) and longer length of stay (51 vs. 27 hours; p < 0.001). One Next-Day-Refeeding patient experienced peritonitis. One Early Refeeding patient experienced cellulitis requiring hospitalization and a second experienced gastrostomy tube migration into the peritoneal cavity requiring removal. CONCLUSION Early Refeeders experienced higher rates of post-procedural nausea or vomiting and irritation, leakage or infection around the stoma; but experienced lower rates of post-operative fever. Early refeeding resulted in reduced nutritional interruption and hospital length of stay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:儿童经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)后24小时开始肠内营养。成人研究报告在PEG 1-6小时内安全再喂养,这些发现已谨慎地应用于儿童。然而,目前缺乏评估儿童早期和第二天再喂养的比较研究。本研究评估了儿童早期和第二天再喂养后的喂养耐受性和并发症。方法本研究为单中心、前后研究。2015年6月,我们的临床实践改为在PEG 6小时内开始重新喂食。纳入2015年12月至2017年8月期间接受提前再喂养的儿童。采用2013年2月至2015年4月的回顾性队列进行比较。结果术后早期再喂养46例,次日再喂养37例。两组的性别分布相似。与次日再喂养的患者相比,早期再喂养的患者在PEG放置时年龄稍大(3.5岁对2.2岁),体重更重(15.5 kg对11.5 kg)。早期再喂养患者术后恶心和/或呕吐更严重(19%对8%,p < 0.001),造口周围渗漏、刺激和感染更严重(19%对0.0%,p < 0.001)。与早期再喂养者相比,第二天再喂养患者出现更高的发热发生率(35% vs 13%, p = 0.021),更长的营养中断(24.6 vs 3.7小时,p < 0.001)和更长的住院时间(51 vs 27小时;p < 0.001)。1例次日再喂养患者出现腹膜炎。一名早期再喂养患者出现蜂窝织炎需要住院治疗,另一名患者出现胃造口管迁移到腹膜腔需要切除。结论早期再喂食者术后恶心、呕吐及造口周围刺激、渗漏或感染发生率较高;但术后发热率较低。早期再喂养减少了营养中断和住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Tolerance and Complication Rates between Early and Delayed Feeding after PEG Placement in Children.
BACKGROUND Enteral nutrition is commonly initiated 24-hours after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children. Adult studies report safe refeeding within 1-6 hours of PEG and these findings have been cautiously applied to children. However, comparative studies assessing early vs next-day refeeding in children are currently lacking. This study evaluates feeding tolerance and complications following early vs. next-day refeeding in children. METHODS This is a single-center, pre-post study. In June 2015 our clinical practice changed to begin refeeding within 6-hours of PEG. Children receiving early refeeding from December 2015 to August 2017 were included. A retrospective cohort from February 2013 to April 2015 was used for comparison. RESULTS 46 children received early refeeding after PEG and 37 received next-day refeeding. Gender distribution was similar in the two groups. Early refeeding patients were slightly older (3.5 vs. 2.2 years) and heavier (15.5 kg vs. 11.5 kg) at PEG placement compared to next-day refeeding patients. Early Refeeding patients experienced greater post-procedural nausea and/or vomiting (19% vs 8%, p < 0.001) and leakage, irritation, and infection around the stoma (19% vs 0.0%, p < 0.001). Compared to Early Refeeders, Next-Day Refeeding patients experienced higher occurrence of fever (35% vs 13%, p = 0.021), longer nutritional disruption (24.6 vs 3.7 hours, p < 0.001) and longer length of stay (51 vs. 27 hours; p < 0.001). One Next-Day-Refeeding patient experienced peritonitis. One Early Refeeding patient experienced cellulitis requiring hospitalization and a second experienced gastrostomy tube migration into the peritoneal cavity requiring removal. CONCLUSION Early Refeeders experienced higher rates of post-procedural nausea or vomiting and irritation, leakage or infection around the stoma; but experienced lower rates of post-operative fever. Early refeeding resulted in reduced nutritional interruption and hospital length of stay.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信