R. Esmaeili, M. Nesami, A. Nadighara, Aghdas Taghizadeh
{"title":"心脏护理单位恢复订单的频率","authors":"R. Esmaeili, M. Nesami, A. Nadighara, Aghdas Taghizadeh","doi":"10.17795/CCN-5100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients' safety is one of the basic concepts in health care systems and one of the major concerns of patient care. Medical errors are amongst the main factors that could threat patients' safety. At intensive care units, there is always the possibility of errors during various stages such as the ordering stage. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of pharmacological and non-pharmacological recovered orders at intensive care units and its associated issues. Patients and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study based on pharmacological and non-pharmacological orders obtained from patients' records and daily record sheets at the intensive care units of Mazandaran heart center during year 2015. All orders from patients' records (n = 1046), which included 29214 orders, were reviewed during a three-month period. Data was collected using a researcher-made checklist and included patients' demographic information and a medical checklist on the patients' conditions, name of the person who had recorded the order and the person who had discovered the recovered order, type of recovered pharmacological and non pharmacological orders and related factors. To analyze the data, statistical tests such as mean and relative frequency, contin- gency parts and chi-square test were applied using the SPSS 19 software. Results: A total of 29214 pharmacological and non pharmacological orders, written in 1046 patients' records of six coronary care units were investigated. We found that 150 (0.5%) recovered orders were documented. The results showed a significant relationship between the academic year of medical assistants and the recovered orders (K2 = 88.619, P < 0.05); most orders were recovered by second-year assistants. Conclusions: According to this study, it is necessary to define a procedure for careful review of pharmacological and non pharmaco- logical orders. In addition, it is recommended to use clinical pharmacologists and expert critical care nurses to allow the possibility of discovering wrong orders before putting them into practice.","PeriodicalId":91413,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","volume":"41 1","pages":"0-0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"FREQUENCY OF RECOVERED ORDERS AT THE CARDIAC CARE UNIT\",\"authors\":\"R. Esmaeili, M. Nesami, A. Nadighara, Aghdas Taghizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.17795/CCN-5100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Patients' safety is one of the basic concepts in health care systems and one of the major concerns of patient care. Medical errors are amongst the main factors that could threat patients' safety. At intensive care units, there is always the possibility of errors during various stages such as the ordering stage. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of pharmacological and non-pharmacological recovered orders at intensive care units and its associated issues. Patients and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study based on pharmacological and non-pharmacological orders obtained from patients' records and daily record sheets at the intensive care units of Mazandaran heart center during year 2015. All orders from patients' records (n = 1046), which included 29214 orders, were reviewed during a three-month period. Data was collected using a researcher-made checklist and included patients' demographic information and a medical checklist on the patients' conditions, name of the person who had recorded the order and the person who had discovered the recovered order, type of recovered pharmacological and non pharmacological orders and related factors. To analyze the data, statistical tests such as mean and relative frequency, contin- gency parts and chi-square test were applied using the SPSS 19 software. Results: A total of 29214 pharmacological and non pharmacological orders, written in 1046 patients' records of six coronary care units were investigated. We found that 150 (0.5%) recovered orders were documented. The results showed a significant relationship between the academic year of medical assistants and the recovered orders (K2 = 88.619, P < 0.05); most orders were recovered by second-year assistants. Conclusions: According to this study, it is necessary to define a procedure for careful review of pharmacological and non pharmaco- logical orders. In addition, it is recommended to use clinical pharmacologists and expert critical care nurses to allow the possibility of discovering wrong orders before putting them into practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0-0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17795/CCN-5100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/CCN-5100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:患者安全是卫生保健系统的基本概念之一,也是患者护理的主要关注点之一。医疗事故是可能威胁患者安全的主要因素之一。在重症监护病房,总是有可能在各个阶段,如订购阶段的错误。目的:本研究的目的是确定重症监护病房药物和非药物康复订单的频率及其相关问题。患者和方法:本研究是一项横断面研究,基于2015年Mazandaran心脏中心重症监护病房的患者记录和日常记录单中获得的药理学和非药理学订单。在三个月的时间里,对来自患者记录(n = 1046)的所有订单(包括29214张订单)进行了审查。数据收集使用研究人员制作的核对表,包括患者的人口统计信息和关于患者病情的医疗核对表、记录医嘱的人的姓名和发现恢复医嘱的人的姓名、恢复的药理学和非药理学医嘱的类型以及相关因素。采用SPSS 19软件进行平均频率、相对频率、偶然性部分、卡方检验等统计检验。结果:共调查6个冠状动脉监护室1046例患者病历中的29214条药理学和非药理学医嘱。我们发现有150个(0.5%)回收订单被记录在案。结果显示:医助员学年与恢复医嘱有显著相关(K2 = 88.619, P < 0.05);大部分订单都是由二年级助理收回的。结论:根据本研究,有必要制定药理学和非药理学处方的详细审查程序。此外,建议使用临床药理学家和专业重症监护护士,以便在实施之前发现错误的处方。
FREQUENCY OF RECOVERED ORDERS AT THE CARDIAC CARE UNIT
Background: Patients' safety is one of the basic concepts in health care systems and one of the major concerns of patient care. Medical errors are amongst the main factors that could threat patients' safety. At intensive care units, there is always the possibility of errors during various stages such as the ordering stage. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of pharmacological and non-pharmacological recovered orders at intensive care units and its associated issues. Patients and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study based on pharmacological and non-pharmacological orders obtained from patients' records and daily record sheets at the intensive care units of Mazandaran heart center during year 2015. All orders from patients' records (n = 1046), which included 29214 orders, were reviewed during a three-month period. Data was collected using a researcher-made checklist and included patients' demographic information and a medical checklist on the patients' conditions, name of the person who had recorded the order and the person who had discovered the recovered order, type of recovered pharmacological and non pharmacological orders and related factors. To analyze the data, statistical tests such as mean and relative frequency, contin- gency parts and chi-square test were applied using the SPSS 19 software. Results: A total of 29214 pharmacological and non pharmacological orders, written in 1046 patients' records of six coronary care units were investigated. We found that 150 (0.5%) recovered orders were documented. The results showed a significant relationship between the academic year of medical assistants and the recovered orders (K2 = 88.619, P < 0.05); most orders were recovered by second-year assistants. Conclusions: According to this study, it is necessary to define a procedure for careful review of pharmacological and non pharmaco- logical orders. In addition, it is recommended to use clinical pharmacologists and expert critical care nurses to allow the possibility of discovering wrong orders before putting them into practice.