联合生产和以艺术为基础的探究是调动知识的创造性力量

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Stephen MacGregor, Amanda Cooper, Michelle Searle, T. Kukkonen
{"title":"联合生产和以艺术为基础的探究是调动知识的创造性力量","authors":"Stephen MacGregor, Amanda Cooper, Michelle Searle, T. Kukkonen","doi":"10.1332/174426421x16478737939339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Interest in using arts-informed approaches within research to increase stakeholder engagement is growing; however, there is little work describing how these approaches are operationalised across contexts. This article addresses that gap by exploring the use of arts-informed approaches across three projects.Aims and objectives: We explore how conceptualising research and evaluation as creative endeavours, particularly in arts-informed approaches to co-production, create opportunities to move knowledge into action (knowledge mobilisation). We propose an actionable configuration of context + mechanism = outcome (CMO) to understand the influence of arts-informed approaches to co-production.Methods: Multi-case design and cross-case synthesis was conducted of three studies that used arts-informed approaches. A common focus across our cases was evidence use in the K-12 education sector; however, each engaged with this focus by involving different types of evidence and sets of education stakeholders.Findings: Arts-informed approaches and co-production were influenced by a variety of contextual factors such as relationships between researchers and stakeholders, ethical issues of collaborative research activities, approaches to meaningful stakeholder engagement, co-production of knowledge, capacity-building support and resources, and communication between multi-stakeholder partners. Outcomes included new ways of thinking about research topics based on arts-informed approaches, more positive attitudes about co-production, more relevant and useful research and evaluation findings, and increased openness to future co-productive work.Discussion and conclusions: Four propositions arising from this article include: (1) arts-informed approaches address context specificity and sensitivity; (2) arts-informed approaches promote engagement; (3) arts-informed approaches enhance and intertwine skills; (4) arts-informed approaches broaden thinking about impact.Key messagesArts-informed approaches address context specificity and sensitivity.Arts-informed approaches promote engagement.Arts-informed approaches enhance and intertwine skills.Arts-informed approaches broaden thinking about impact.","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-production and arts-informed inquiry as creative power for knowledge mobilisation\",\"authors\":\"Stephen MacGregor, Amanda Cooper, Michelle Searle, T. Kukkonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/174426421x16478737939339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Interest in using arts-informed approaches within research to increase stakeholder engagement is growing; however, there is little work describing how these approaches are operationalised across contexts. This article addresses that gap by exploring the use of arts-informed approaches across three projects.Aims and objectives: We explore how conceptualising research and evaluation as creative endeavours, particularly in arts-informed approaches to co-production, create opportunities to move knowledge into action (knowledge mobilisation). We propose an actionable configuration of context + mechanism = outcome (CMO) to understand the influence of arts-informed approaches to co-production.Methods: Multi-case design and cross-case synthesis was conducted of three studies that used arts-informed approaches. A common focus across our cases was evidence use in the K-12 education sector; however, each engaged with this focus by involving different types of evidence and sets of education stakeholders.Findings: Arts-informed approaches and co-production were influenced by a variety of contextual factors such as relationships between researchers and stakeholders, ethical issues of collaborative research activities, approaches to meaningful stakeholder engagement, co-production of knowledge, capacity-building support and resources, and communication between multi-stakeholder partners. Outcomes included new ways of thinking about research topics based on arts-informed approaches, more positive attitudes about co-production, more relevant and useful research and evaluation findings, and increased openness to future co-productive work.Discussion and conclusions: Four propositions arising from this article include: (1) arts-informed approaches address context specificity and sensitivity; (2) arts-informed approaches promote engagement; (3) arts-informed approaches enhance and intertwine skills; (4) arts-informed approaches broaden thinking about impact.Key messagesArts-informed approaches address context specificity and sensitivity.Arts-informed approaches promote engagement.Arts-informed approaches enhance and intertwine skills.Arts-informed approaches broaden thinking about impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence & Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421x16478737939339\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421x16478737939339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:在研究中使用艺术知情方法来增加利益相关者参与的兴趣正在增长;然而,很少有工作描述这些方法是如何跨上下文操作的。本文通过探索在三个项目中使用艺术知情方法来解决这一差距。目的和目标:我们探索如何将研究和评估概念化为创造性的努力,特别是在艺术知情的合作生产方法中,创造将知识转化为行动的机会(知识动员)。我们提出了一个可操作的背景+机制=结果(CMO)配置,以了解艺术知情方法对合作制作的影响。方法:采用艺术知情方法对三项研究进行多病例设计和交叉病例综合。在我们的案例中,一个共同的焦点是K-12教育部门的证据使用;然而,每个项目都通过涉及不同类型的证据和教育利益相关者来关注这一重点。研究发现:以艺术为导向的方法和合作生产受到多种背景因素的影响,如研究人员与利益相关者之间的关系、合作研究活动的伦理问题、有意义的利益相关者参与的方法、知识的共同生产、能力建设支持和资源,以及多利益相关者伙伴之间的沟通。结果包括基于艺术信息方法的研究主题的新思维方式,对合作生产的更积极态度,更相关和有用的研究和评估结果,以及对未来合作生产工作的更开放。讨论和结论:本文提出的四个命题包括:(1)艺术知情方法解决了语境特异性和敏感性;(2)艺术知情方法促进参与;(3)以艺术为基础的方法增强和交织技能;(4)基于艺术的方法拓宽了对影响的思考。关键信息艺术知情的方法解决了上下文的特异性和敏感性。以艺术为基础的方法促进参与。以艺术为导向的方法增强并交织技能。以艺术为基础的方法拓宽了对影响的思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Co-production and arts-informed inquiry as creative power for knowledge mobilisation
Background: Interest in using arts-informed approaches within research to increase stakeholder engagement is growing; however, there is little work describing how these approaches are operationalised across contexts. This article addresses that gap by exploring the use of arts-informed approaches across three projects.Aims and objectives: We explore how conceptualising research and evaluation as creative endeavours, particularly in arts-informed approaches to co-production, create opportunities to move knowledge into action (knowledge mobilisation). We propose an actionable configuration of context + mechanism = outcome (CMO) to understand the influence of arts-informed approaches to co-production.Methods: Multi-case design and cross-case synthesis was conducted of three studies that used arts-informed approaches. A common focus across our cases was evidence use in the K-12 education sector; however, each engaged with this focus by involving different types of evidence and sets of education stakeholders.Findings: Arts-informed approaches and co-production were influenced by a variety of contextual factors such as relationships between researchers and stakeholders, ethical issues of collaborative research activities, approaches to meaningful stakeholder engagement, co-production of knowledge, capacity-building support and resources, and communication between multi-stakeholder partners. Outcomes included new ways of thinking about research topics based on arts-informed approaches, more positive attitudes about co-production, more relevant and useful research and evaluation findings, and increased openness to future co-productive work.Discussion and conclusions: Four propositions arising from this article include: (1) arts-informed approaches address context specificity and sensitivity; (2) arts-informed approaches promote engagement; (3) arts-informed approaches enhance and intertwine skills; (4) arts-informed approaches broaden thinking about impact.Key messagesArts-informed approaches address context specificity and sensitivity.Arts-informed approaches promote engagement.Arts-informed approaches enhance and intertwine skills.Arts-informed approaches broaden thinking about impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信