文学语言的形成与认知:以中世纪的希伯来语和阿拉姆语为例

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Elitzur A. Bar-Asher Siegal
{"title":"文学语言的形成与认知:以中世纪的希伯来语和阿拉姆语为例","authors":"Elitzur A. Bar-Asher Siegal","doi":"10.1353/hbr.2021.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper characterizes Medieval Hebrew and Aramaic as literary languages and seeks to explain how a 'literary language' – namely a language used mainly in literary contexts – arises, while utilizing three types of research: comparative philological research, which compares different languages and texts in terms of their vocabulary and grammar; sociolinguistic research, which examines the social functions of language use; and psycholinguistic research, which (in this particular case) examines issues of language acquisition.The paper builds on philological studies of literary languages to explain how the grammar of these languages evolves. It assumes that the acquisition of such languages is similar to second-language acquisition, while taking into account that these languages are both acquired and used in a strictly literary context. The main argument of the paper is that literary languages should be studied the same way as other languages, because ultimately – after making some adjustments motivated by their particular functions – they are compatible with the standard models of second-language acquisition.","PeriodicalId":35110,"journal":{"name":"Hebrew Studies","volume":"49 1","pages":"343 - 363"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Formation and the Cognitive Knowledge of Literary Languages: The Case of Hebrew and Aramaic in the Middle Ages\",\"authors\":\"Elitzur A. Bar-Asher Siegal\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hbr.2021.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This paper characterizes Medieval Hebrew and Aramaic as literary languages and seeks to explain how a 'literary language' – namely a language used mainly in literary contexts – arises, while utilizing three types of research: comparative philological research, which compares different languages and texts in terms of their vocabulary and grammar; sociolinguistic research, which examines the social functions of language use; and psycholinguistic research, which (in this particular case) examines issues of language acquisition.The paper builds on philological studies of literary languages to explain how the grammar of these languages evolves. It assumes that the acquisition of such languages is similar to second-language acquisition, while taking into account that these languages are both acquired and used in a strictly literary context. The main argument of the paper is that literary languages should be studied the same way as other languages, because ultimately – after making some adjustments motivated by their particular functions – they are compatible with the standard models of second-language acquisition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"343 - 363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hebrew Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2021.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hebrew Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2021.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文将中世纪希伯来语和阿拉姆语定性为文学语言,并试图解释“文学语言”(即主要用于文学语境的语言)是如何产生的,同时利用三种类型的研究:比较语言学研究,从词汇和语法方面比较不同的语言和文本;社会语言学研究,研究语言使用的社会功能;心理语言学研究(在这个特殊的案例中)研究语言习得的问题。本文以文学语言的语言学研究为基础来解释这些语言的语法是如何演变的。它假设这些语言的习得类似于第二语言的习得,同时考虑到这些语言都是在严格的文学语境中习得和使用的。本文的主要论点是,文学语言应该像其他语言一样被研究,因为最终-在其特定功能的激励下进行一些调整-它们与第二语言习得的标准模型兼容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Formation and the Cognitive Knowledge of Literary Languages: The Case of Hebrew and Aramaic in the Middle Ages
Abstract:This paper characterizes Medieval Hebrew and Aramaic as literary languages and seeks to explain how a 'literary language' – namely a language used mainly in literary contexts – arises, while utilizing three types of research: comparative philological research, which compares different languages and texts in terms of their vocabulary and grammar; sociolinguistic research, which examines the social functions of language use; and psycholinguistic research, which (in this particular case) examines issues of language acquisition.The paper builds on philological studies of literary languages to explain how the grammar of these languages evolves. It assumes that the acquisition of such languages is similar to second-language acquisition, while taking into account that these languages are both acquired and used in a strictly literary context. The main argument of the paper is that literary languages should be studied the same way as other languages, because ultimately – after making some adjustments motivated by their particular functions – they are compatible with the standard models of second-language acquisition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hebrew Studies
Hebrew Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信