Andrew E. Czeizel, M. Rockenbauer, Henrik T Sørensen, Jørn Olsen
{"title":"基于人群的三种静脉注射青霉素的病例对照致畸研究","authors":"Andrew E. Czeizel, M. Rockenbauer, Henrik T Sørensen, Jørn Olsen","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-4520.1999.tb00556.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to check the human teratogenic potential of three penicillins G: parenteral treatments with benzylpenicillin, benzylpenicillin‐procaine, and benzylpenicillin + benzylpenicillin‐procaine during pregnancy in the population‐based dataset of the Hungarian Case‐Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities, 1980–1996. Of 38,151 pregnant women who had babies without any defects (population control group), 303 (0.8%) were treated with penicillin G. Of 22,865 pregnant women who had offspring with congenital abnormalities, 236 (1.O%) were treated with penicillin G (crude OR with 95% CI = 1.3, 1.1–1.5). Of 812 mothers who deliveried babies affected with Down syndrome (patient controls), 15 (1.8%) had penicillin G treatment, and this rate exceeded significantly the figure of both the case and population control groups. This finding needs further studies. The case‐control pair analysis did not indicate a teratogenic risk of three parenteral penicillin G treatments during the second‐third months of gestation, i.e., in the critical period for major congenital abnormalities. The lower use of penicillins G was explained mainly by recall bias in the population control group. Thus, parenteral penicillin G treatments during pregnancy do not present a detectable teratogenic risk to the fetus.","PeriodicalId":93953,"journal":{"name":"Congenital anomalies","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Population‐based Case‐Control Teratological Study of Three Parenteral Penicillins G\",\"authors\":\"Andrew E. Czeizel, M. Rockenbauer, Henrik T Sørensen, Jørn Olsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1741-4520.1999.tb00556.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the study was to check the human teratogenic potential of three penicillins G: parenteral treatments with benzylpenicillin, benzylpenicillin‐procaine, and benzylpenicillin + benzylpenicillin‐procaine during pregnancy in the population‐based dataset of the Hungarian Case‐Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities, 1980–1996. Of 38,151 pregnant women who had babies without any defects (population control group), 303 (0.8%) were treated with penicillin G. Of 22,865 pregnant women who had offspring with congenital abnormalities, 236 (1.O%) were treated with penicillin G (crude OR with 95% CI = 1.3, 1.1–1.5). Of 812 mothers who deliveried babies affected with Down syndrome (patient controls), 15 (1.8%) had penicillin G treatment, and this rate exceeded significantly the figure of both the case and population control groups. This finding needs further studies. The case‐control pair analysis did not indicate a teratogenic risk of three parenteral penicillin G treatments during the second‐third months of gestation, i.e., in the critical period for major congenital abnormalities. The lower use of penicillins G was explained mainly by recall bias in the population control group. Thus, parenteral penicillin G treatments during pregnancy do not present a detectable teratogenic risk to the fetus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Congenital anomalies\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Congenital anomalies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4520.1999.tb00556.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congenital anomalies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4520.1999.tb00556.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
该研究的目的是在匈牙利1980-1996年先天性异常病例对照监测的人口数据集中,检查三种青霉素G在妊娠期间的人类致畸潜力:青霉素、青霉素-普鲁卡因和青霉素+青霉素-普鲁卡因的肠外治疗。在38151名无任何缺陷婴儿的孕妇(人口对照组)中,303名(0.8%)接受青霉素G治疗。在22865名有先天性异常后代的孕妇中,236名(1.1%)接受青霉素G治疗(粗OR值,95% CI = 1.3, 1.1-1.5)。在812名分娩患有唐氏综合症婴儿的母亲(患者对照组)中,15名(1.8%)接受了青霉素G治疗,这一比率明显超过了病例组和人群对照组的数字。这一发现需要进一步研究。病例对照分析未显示在妊娠第二至第三个月,即主要先天性异常的关键时期,三种静脉注射青霉素G治疗有致畸风险。青霉素G的较低使用主要是由人群对照组的回忆偏倚解释的。因此,妊娠期静脉注射青霉素G治疗不会对胎儿产生可检测到的致畸风险。
A Population‐based Case‐Control Teratological Study of Three Parenteral Penicillins G
The purpose of the study was to check the human teratogenic potential of three penicillins G: parenteral treatments with benzylpenicillin, benzylpenicillin‐procaine, and benzylpenicillin + benzylpenicillin‐procaine during pregnancy in the population‐based dataset of the Hungarian Case‐Control Surveillance of Congenital Abnormalities, 1980–1996. Of 38,151 pregnant women who had babies without any defects (population control group), 303 (0.8%) were treated with penicillin G. Of 22,865 pregnant women who had offspring with congenital abnormalities, 236 (1.O%) were treated with penicillin G (crude OR with 95% CI = 1.3, 1.1–1.5). Of 812 mothers who deliveried babies affected with Down syndrome (patient controls), 15 (1.8%) had penicillin G treatment, and this rate exceeded significantly the figure of both the case and population control groups. This finding needs further studies. The case‐control pair analysis did not indicate a teratogenic risk of three parenteral penicillin G treatments during the second‐third months of gestation, i.e., in the critical period for major congenital abnormalities. The lower use of penicillins G was explained mainly by recall bias in the population control group. Thus, parenteral penicillin G treatments during pregnancy do not present a detectable teratogenic risk to the fetus.