在第三个奇穆伦加的阴影下?:津巴布韦土地改革矩阵内的非洲移民中介和受益者

IF 1.3 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Anusa Daimon
{"title":"在第三个奇穆伦加的阴影下?:津巴布韦土地改革矩阵内的非洲移民中介和受益者","authors":"Anusa Daimon","doi":"10.1080/21681392.2021.1935087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zimbabwe’s agrarian reform (‘Third Chimurenga’) narrative continues to cast more insights into the fate of farm workers, many of whom, as descendants of black Africans in the former British and Portuguese central African colonies of what are today Malawi, Zambia and Mozambique, were not seen as ‘Zimbabwean enough’ to benefit from the exercise. While many of these workers were adversely affected, a few, particularly the senior farm supervisors/foremen, showed agency in exploiting the miniscule avenues offered by the reform to position themselves, and eventually access land. Some became intermediaries between the state, the new black settler farmers and former white owners, sowing mutual trust and ambience within a volatile and potentially explosive situation. Using ethnographic data from an A1-designated case study farm (Billdore/Riverside) in the Trelawney/Banket commercial farming area in Zimbabwe’s Mashonaland West province, the article suggests that such micro-level positionalities and functions proved critical in the ensuing politics of land appropriation that was predicated on partisan citizenship and belonging rhetoric. Despite their state of unbelonging, some of these previously landless migrant workers have emerged from the shadows of the Third Chimurenga and become their own masters, forging mutual relations and land-labour arrangements amidst the uncertainties of the ever-changing Zimbabwean land tenure system and political environment.","PeriodicalId":37966,"journal":{"name":"Critical African Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In the shadows of the third Chimurenga?: African migrant intermediaries and beneficiaries within Zimbabwe’s agrarian reform matrix\",\"authors\":\"Anusa Daimon\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21681392.2021.1935087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Zimbabwe’s agrarian reform (‘Third Chimurenga’) narrative continues to cast more insights into the fate of farm workers, many of whom, as descendants of black Africans in the former British and Portuguese central African colonies of what are today Malawi, Zambia and Mozambique, were not seen as ‘Zimbabwean enough’ to benefit from the exercise. While many of these workers were adversely affected, a few, particularly the senior farm supervisors/foremen, showed agency in exploiting the miniscule avenues offered by the reform to position themselves, and eventually access land. Some became intermediaries between the state, the new black settler farmers and former white owners, sowing mutual trust and ambience within a volatile and potentially explosive situation. Using ethnographic data from an A1-designated case study farm (Billdore/Riverside) in the Trelawney/Banket commercial farming area in Zimbabwe’s Mashonaland West province, the article suggests that such micro-level positionalities and functions proved critical in the ensuing politics of land appropriation that was predicated on partisan citizenship and belonging rhetoric. Despite their state of unbelonging, some of these previously landless migrant workers have emerged from the shadows of the Third Chimurenga and become their own masters, forging mutual relations and land-labour arrangements amidst the uncertainties of the ever-changing Zimbabwean land tenure system and political environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical African Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical African Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2021.1935087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical African Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681392.2021.1935087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

津巴布韦的土地改革(“第三次奇穆伦加”)继续让人们更深入地了解农场工人的命运,其中许多人是前英国和葡萄牙中非殖民地(即今天的马拉维、赞比亚和莫桑比克)的非洲黑人后裔,他们被认为不够“津巴布韦人”,无法从改革中受益。虽然这些工人中的许多人受到不利影响,但少数人,特别是高级农场主管/工头,在利用改革提供的微小途径来定位自己并最终获得土地方面表现出代理能力。一些人成为了国家、新黑人移民农民和前白人业主之间的中间人,在动荡和可能爆发的局势中播下了相互信任和氛围。本文使用了来自a1指定的案例研究农场(Billdore/Riverside)的人种学数据,该农场位于津巴布韦西部马绍纳兰省的特里劳尼/班基特商业农业地区,文章表明,这种微观层面的地位和功能在随后的土地征用政治中被证明是至关重要的,这种政治基于党派公民身份和归属修辞。尽管他们处于无归属感的状态,这些以前无地的移徙工人中的一些人已经从第三次奇穆伦加的阴影中走出来,成为他们自己的主人,在不断变化的津巴布韦土地保有制度和政治环境的不确定性中建立相互关系和土地劳动安排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In the shadows of the third Chimurenga?: African migrant intermediaries and beneficiaries within Zimbabwe’s agrarian reform matrix
Zimbabwe’s agrarian reform (‘Third Chimurenga’) narrative continues to cast more insights into the fate of farm workers, many of whom, as descendants of black Africans in the former British and Portuguese central African colonies of what are today Malawi, Zambia and Mozambique, were not seen as ‘Zimbabwean enough’ to benefit from the exercise. While many of these workers were adversely affected, a few, particularly the senior farm supervisors/foremen, showed agency in exploiting the miniscule avenues offered by the reform to position themselves, and eventually access land. Some became intermediaries between the state, the new black settler farmers and former white owners, sowing mutual trust and ambience within a volatile and potentially explosive situation. Using ethnographic data from an A1-designated case study farm (Billdore/Riverside) in the Trelawney/Banket commercial farming area in Zimbabwe’s Mashonaland West province, the article suggests that such micro-level positionalities and functions proved critical in the ensuing politics of land appropriation that was predicated on partisan citizenship and belonging rhetoric. Despite their state of unbelonging, some of these previously landless migrant workers have emerged from the shadows of the Third Chimurenga and become their own masters, forging mutual relations and land-labour arrangements amidst the uncertainties of the ever-changing Zimbabwean land tenure system and political environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical African Studies
Critical African Studies Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Critical African Studies seeks to return Africanist scholarship to the heart of theoretical innovation within each of its constituent disciplines, including Anthropology, Political Science, Sociology, History, Law and Economics. We offer authors a more flexible publishing platform than other journals, allowing them greater space to develop empirical discussions alongside theoretical and conceptual engagements. We aim to publish scholarly articles that offer both innovative empirical contributions, grounded in original fieldwork, and also innovative theoretical engagements. This speaks to our broader intention to promote the deployment of thorough empirical work for the purposes of sophisticated theoretical innovation. We invite contributions that meet the aims of the journal, including special issue proposals that offer fresh empirical and theoretical insights into African Studies debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信