两个使用关系式比较均匀空间和近距离空间的示例

IF 0.3 Q4 MATHEMATICS
G. Pataki
{"title":"两个使用关系式比较均匀空间和近距离空间的示例","authors":"G. Pataki","doi":"10.33039/ami.2022.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". We introduce (generalized) proximities in the same way as (gen-eralized) uniformities in paper of Weil. We prove the equivalence of our new definitions with classical ones. Using these analog definitions, we compare the properties of (generalized) proximities and (generalized) uniformities. The main parts of this paper are examples of an ( 𝑋, ℛ ) relator space such that ℛ # is uniformly (and proximally) transitive, but neither ℛ nor ℛ Φ is proximally (or uniformly) transitive. For this, we summarize the essential properties of relators, using their theory from earlier works of Á. Száz.","PeriodicalId":43454,"journal":{"name":"Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two illustrating examples for comparison of uniform and proximal spaces using relators\",\"authors\":\"G. Pataki\",\"doi\":\"10.33039/ami.2022.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". We introduce (generalized) proximities in the same way as (gen-eralized) uniformities in paper of Weil. We prove the equivalence of our new definitions with classical ones. Using these analog definitions, we compare the properties of (generalized) proximities and (generalized) uniformities. The main parts of this paper are examples of an ( 𝑋, ℛ ) relator space such that ℛ # is uniformly (and proximally) transitive, but neither ℛ nor ℛ Φ is proximally (or uniformly) transitive. For this, we summarize the essential properties of relators, using their theory from earlier works of Á. Száz.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33039/ami.2022.09.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Mathematicae et Informaticae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33039/ami.2022.09.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

. 在Weil的论文中,我们采用与(广义)均匀性相同的方法引入(广义)接近性。我们证明了新定义与经典定义的等价性。利用这些类比定义,我们比较了(广义)近似性和(广义)均匀性的性质。本文的主要部分是一个(𝑋,%)相对空间的例子,使得%是一致(和近)可传递的,但是%和% Φ都不是近(或一致)可传递的。为此,我们利用Á早期著作中的理论,总结了相关子的基本性质。Szaz。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two illustrating examples for comparison of uniform and proximal spaces using relators
. We introduce (generalized) proximities in the same way as (gen-eralized) uniformities in paper of Weil. We prove the equivalence of our new definitions with classical ones. Using these analog definitions, we compare the properties of (generalized) proximities and (generalized) uniformities. The main parts of this paper are examples of an ( 𝑋, ℛ ) relator space such that ℛ # is uniformly (and proximally) transitive, but neither ℛ nor ℛ Φ is proximally (or uniformly) transitive. For this, we summarize the essential properties of relators, using their theory from earlier works of Á. Száz.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信