身份与遗产:津巴布韦不断变化的政治和遗产的挪用

Pub Date : 2020-09-17 DOI:10.1080/09744053.2020.1815506
Henry Chiwaura, S. Naidoo
{"title":"身份与遗产:津巴布韦不断变化的政治和遗产的挪用","authors":"Henry Chiwaura, S. Naidoo","doi":"10.1080/09744053.2020.1815506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is an explanation of the use of heritage representations and narratives within the ever-changing political matrix in Zimbabwe. The analysis is done within the context of heritage being regarded as a cultural process rather than as a product. Focus is on how heritage has been appropriated by both the colonial and post-colonial state in building national identities. From 1890 the settlers appropriated some of the existing heritage that belonged to indigenous groups on the land between Limpopo and Zambezi Rivers. The article fully acknowledges that identity is a fluid and controversial concept that is influenced by cultural frameworks, historical period and those in power at any particular time. Therefore, heritage herein is viewed as an identity influencer and, in the case of emerging nations; heritage is responsible for the construction of national identity.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identity and heritage: changing politics and appropriation of heritage in Zimbabwe\",\"authors\":\"Henry Chiwaura, S. Naidoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09744053.2020.1815506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article is an explanation of the use of heritage representations and narratives within the ever-changing political matrix in Zimbabwe. The analysis is done within the context of heritage being regarded as a cultural process rather than as a product. Focus is on how heritage has been appropriated by both the colonial and post-colonial state in building national identities. From 1890 the settlers appropriated some of the existing heritage that belonged to indigenous groups on the land between Limpopo and Zambezi Rivers. The article fully acknowledges that identity is a fluid and controversial concept that is influenced by cultural frameworks, historical period and those in power at any particular time. Therefore, heritage herein is viewed as an identity influencer and, in the case of emerging nations; heritage is responsible for the construction of national identity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09744053.2020.1815506\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09744053.2020.1815506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文解释了在津巴布韦不断变化的政治矩阵中使用遗产表征和叙事。分析是在遗产被视为文化过程而不是产品的背景下进行的。重点是遗产如何被殖民和后殖民国家在建立民族认同的过程中被挪用。从1890年起,移民们侵占了林波波河和赞比西河之间土地上属于土著群体的一些现有遗产。本文充分认识到,身份是一个流动的、有争议的概念,受文化框架、历史时期和任何特定时期的掌权者的影响。因此,遗产在这里被视为身份影响者,在新兴国家的情况下;遗产负责国家认同的建构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Identity and heritage: changing politics and appropriation of heritage in Zimbabwe
ABSTRACT This article is an explanation of the use of heritage representations and narratives within the ever-changing political matrix in Zimbabwe. The analysis is done within the context of heritage being regarded as a cultural process rather than as a product. Focus is on how heritage has been appropriated by both the colonial and post-colonial state in building national identities. From 1890 the settlers appropriated some of the existing heritage that belonged to indigenous groups on the land between Limpopo and Zambezi Rivers. The article fully acknowledges that identity is a fluid and controversial concept that is influenced by cultural frameworks, historical period and those in power at any particular time. Therefore, heritage herein is viewed as an identity influencer and, in the case of emerging nations; heritage is responsible for the construction of national identity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信