糖尿病对大鼠心肌梗死和无回流大小的影响

W. Dai, R. Kloner, Jianru Shi, Serge Korjian, Y. Daaboul, M. Gibson, M. Bouly, M. Isabelle, Juan E. Carreño
{"title":"糖尿病对大鼠心肌梗死和无回流大小的影响","authors":"W. Dai, R. Kloner, Jianru Shi, Serge Korjian, Y. Daaboul, M. Gibson, M. Bouly, M. Isabelle, Juan E. Carreño","doi":"10.4172/2155-9880.1000560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We determined the effect of diabetes on no reflow and myocardial infarct sizes in both an experimental rat model of diabetes and a contemporary trial of subjects with STEMI. \nMethods: Adult Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) and Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (n=15 each group) were subjected to left coronary artery occlusion for 30 min followed by 3 h of reperfusion. In the clinical trial, the myocardial infarct (MI) size and the zone of microvascular obstruction were assessed in 258 non-diabetic MI patient and 34 diabetic MI patients. \nResults: There was no difference in infarct size (median) in ZDF rats (49.9%) versus SD rats (59.6%; p=0.32); there was no difference in no-reflow size (mean ± SEM) in ZDF rats (32.5 ± 3.5%) versus SD rats (32.7 ± 4.3%; p=0.97). In the clinical study, CK-MB and Troponin I area under the curve at 72 h were comparable between the 2 groups. Infarct size by MRI on day 4 was 37.9 ± 1.8 ml in 216 non-diabetic patients and 34.8 ± 4.7 ml in 27 diabetic patients (p=0.559). The ratio of micro vascular obstruction on day 4 on the MRI was 0.179 ± 0.018 of the left ventricle in 200 non-diabetic patients and 0.220 ± 0.060 of the left ventricle in 23 diabetic patients. \nConclusions: Both animal and clinical studies demonstrated no evidence for a larger infarct size, or larger area of no reflow in the diabetic compared to non-diabetic conditions.","PeriodicalId":15504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","volume":"98 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Diabetes on Myocardial Infarct and No Reflow Size in an Experimental Rat Model and Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"W. Dai, R. Kloner, Jianru Shi, Serge Korjian, Y. Daaboul, M. Gibson, M. Bouly, M. Isabelle, Juan E. Carreño\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-9880.1000560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: We determined the effect of diabetes on no reflow and myocardial infarct sizes in both an experimental rat model of diabetes and a contemporary trial of subjects with STEMI. \\nMethods: Adult Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) and Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (n=15 each group) were subjected to left coronary artery occlusion for 30 min followed by 3 h of reperfusion. In the clinical trial, the myocardial infarct (MI) size and the zone of microvascular obstruction were assessed in 258 non-diabetic MI patient and 34 diabetic MI patients. \\nResults: There was no difference in infarct size (median) in ZDF rats (49.9%) versus SD rats (59.6%; p=0.32); there was no difference in no-reflow size (mean ± SEM) in ZDF rats (32.5 ± 3.5%) versus SD rats (32.7 ± 4.3%; p=0.97). In the clinical study, CK-MB and Troponin I area under the curve at 72 h were comparable between the 2 groups. Infarct size by MRI on day 4 was 37.9 ± 1.8 ml in 216 non-diabetic patients and 34.8 ± 4.7 ml in 27 diabetic patients (p=0.559). The ratio of micro vascular obstruction on day 4 on the MRI was 0.179 ± 0.018 of the left ventricle in 200 non-diabetic patients and 0.220 ± 0.060 of the left ventricle in 23 diabetic patients. \\nConclusions: Both animal and clinical studies demonstrated no evidence for a larger infarct size, or larger area of no reflow in the diabetic compared to non-diabetic conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-9880.1000560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:我们在糖尿病的实验大鼠模型和STEMI受试者的当代试验中确定了糖尿病对无回流和心肌梗死大小的影响。方法:取成年Zucker糖尿病脂肪大鼠(ZDF)和Sprague Dawley大鼠(SD),每组15只,阻断左冠状动脉30 min,再灌注3 h。在临床试验中,对258例非糖尿病性心肌梗死患者和34例糖尿病性心肌梗死患者的心肌梗死面积和微血管阻塞区进行了评估。结果:ZDF大鼠(49.9%)与SD大鼠(59.6%)梗死面积(中位数)无差异;p = 0.32);ZDF大鼠(32.5±3.5%)与SD大鼠(32.7±4.3%)的无回流大小(平均±SEM)无差异;p = 0.97)。在临床研究中,两组在72 h时CK-MB和肌钙蛋白I曲线下面积具有可比性。第4天MRI梗死面积非糖尿病患者216例为37.9±1.8 ml,糖尿病患者27例为34.8±4.7 ml (p=0.559)。非糖尿病患者第4天MRI微血管阻塞率为左心室0.179±0.018,糖尿病患者23例为左心室0.220±0.060。结论:动物和临床研究均未证明糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者相比有更大的梗死面积或更大的无血流循环面积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Diabetes on Myocardial Infarct and No Reflow Size in an Experimental Rat Model and Clinical Trial
Background: We determined the effect of diabetes on no reflow and myocardial infarct sizes in both an experimental rat model of diabetes and a contemporary trial of subjects with STEMI. Methods: Adult Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) and Sprague Dawley (SD) rats (n=15 each group) were subjected to left coronary artery occlusion for 30 min followed by 3 h of reperfusion. In the clinical trial, the myocardial infarct (MI) size and the zone of microvascular obstruction were assessed in 258 non-diabetic MI patient and 34 diabetic MI patients. Results: There was no difference in infarct size (median) in ZDF rats (49.9%) versus SD rats (59.6%; p=0.32); there was no difference in no-reflow size (mean ± SEM) in ZDF rats (32.5 ± 3.5%) versus SD rats (32.7 ± 4.3%; p=0.97). In the clinical study, CK-MB and Troponin I area under the curve at 72 h were comparable between the 2 groups. Infarct size by MRI on day 4 was 37.9 ± 1.8 ml in 216 non-diabetic patients and 34.8 ± 4.7 ml in 27 diabetic patients (p=0.559). The ratio of micro vascular obstruction on day 4 on the MRI was 0.179 ± 0.018 of the left ventricle in 200 non-diabetic patients and 0.220 ± 0.060 of the left ventricle in 23 diabetic patients. Conclusions: Both animal and clinical studies demonstrated no evidence for a larger infarct size, or larger area of no reflow in the diabetic compared to non-diabetic conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信