{"title":"重新发现失去的价值观:探索领导力中价值观的背景和普遍观点","authors":"W. Williams, M. Novicevic, Anthony P. Ammeter","doi":"10.9774/gleaf.3709.2015.ju.00007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". . .the first principle of value that we need to rediscover is this: that all reality hinges on moral foundations (Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in his sermon, \"Rediscovering Lost Values\").Dr. martin luther king, jr. delivered the \"Rediscovering Lost Values\" sermon as a guest minister at Second Baptist Church in Detroit, MI in 1954. Throughout the sermon, Dr. King (a civil rights leader and pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, GA) discusses his belief that our values have taken a turn for the worse. He states that people tend to change their values and morals to fit the given situation, and urges the congregation to understand that \"all reality hinges on moral foundations.\"While Dr. King delivered this sermon many years ago, the concept of valuesbased approaches to leadership (i.e., transformational, authentic, spiritual, servant, charismatic, ethical, etc.) is still a current and highly researched topic in leadership. The basic tenet of values-based approaches to leadership is that leaders can and should influence followers' values in order to motivate employees and achieve superior performance (Avolio et al., 2009). This idea is not new, as Chester Barnard (1938, p. 279) stated, \"the distinguishing mark of managerial responsibility is that it requires not merely conformance to a complex code of morals but also the creation of moral codes for others.\" However, the question of the origin of these values differs within leadership approaches, where the specific role of values tends to fall within two separate views. Some approaches view leader values as universal; in other words, the leader always espouses his/her personal values to their followers. Other approaches contend that the leader's espoused values depend on the context, and could be either the leader's personal values, those of the organization, or even aligned to meet the expectations of their followers (Shamir, 2007). This distinction is important because followers often link the leader's espoused values with their own, which impacts their commitment to the leader's mission and their overall performance (Brown and Trevino, 2009). Values-based leadership depends on the moral content conveyed (Burns, 1998), and the leader may impart the values set forth by the organization or the situation instead of the leader's personal values (Carlson and Perrewe, 1995).Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the alignment of values within leadership in order to approach the universal versus contextual debate. To that end, we begin with a review of the current literature, which includes an overview of values, as well as context-specific and universal approaches to valuesbased leadership. Next, we provide an overview of our focal leader (Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.) and the values lexicon methodology used to assess his espoused values through his most prominent speeches and sermons. Finally, results are presented, followed by the discussion section and conclusion.Literature reviewValuesValues are defined in numerous ways in the literature, sometimes with little agreement between definitions. Yukl (1998) contended that values are \"internalized attitudes about what is right and wrong, ethical or unethical, moral and unmoral\" (Yukl, 1998, p. 234). Meglino and Ravlin (1998) viewed values in concert with behavior, suggesting that values are \"a person's internalized belief about how he or she should or ought to behave\" (p. 354). A common definition, suggested by Rokeach (1973, p. 5), views a value as \"an enduring belief that a specific mode of conduct or end state of existence is personally or socially preferable to an opposite or converse mode of conduct or end-state of existence.\"Following Rokeach (1973), Schwartz (1992) developed a theory of basic human values based on ten values that focus on the motivation of the individual: Power, Achievement, Hedonism, Stimulation, Self-direction, Universalism, Benevolence, Tradition, Conformity, and Security (Appendix A provides a description of each value). …","PeriodicalId":90357,"journal":{"name":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","volume":"30 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rediscovering Lost Values: Exploring Contextual and Universal Views of Values within Leadership\",\"authors\":\"W. Williams, M. Novicevic, Anthony P. Ammeter\",\"doi\":\"10.9774/gleaf.3709.2015.ju.00007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". . .the first principle of value that we need to rediscover is this: that all reality hinges on moral foundations (Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in his sermon, \\\"Rediscovering Lost Values\\\").Dr. martin luther king, jr. delivered the \\\"Rediscovering Lost Values\\\" sermon as a guest minister at Second Baptist Church in Detroit, MI in 1954. Throughout the sermon, Dr. King (a civil rights leader and pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, GA) discusses his belief that our values have taken a turn for the worse. He states that people tend to change their values and morals to fit the given situation, and urges the congregation to understand that \\\"all reality hinges on moral foundations.\\\"While Dr. King delivered this sermon many years ago, the concept of valuesbased approaches to leadership (i.e., transformational, authentic, spiritual, servant, charismatic, ethical, etc.) is still a current and highly researched topic in leadership. The basic tenet of values-based approaches to leadership is that leaders can and should influence followers' values in order to motivate employees and achieve superior performance (Avolio et al., 2009). This idea is not new, as Chester Barnard (1938, p. 279) stated, \\\"the distinguishing mark of managerial responsibility is that it requires not merely conformance to a complex code of morals but also the creation of moral codes for others.\\\" However, the question of the origin of these values differs within leadership approaches, where the specific role of values tends to fall within two separate views. Some approaches view leader values as universal; in other words, the leader always espouses his/her personal values to their followers. Other approaches contend that the leader's espoused values depend on the context, and could be either the leader's personal values, those of the organization, or even aligned to meet the expectations of their followers (Shamir, 2007). This distinction is important because followers often link the leader's espoused values with their own, which impacts their commitment to the leader's mission and their overall performance (Brown and Trevino, 2009). Values-based leadership depends on the moral content conveyed (Burns, 1998), and the leader may impart the values set forth by the organization or the situation instead of the leader's personal values (Carlson and Perrewe, 1995).Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the alignment of values within leadership in order to approach the universal versus contextual debate. To that end, we begin with a review of the current literature, which includes an overview of values, as well as context-specific and universal approaches to valuesbased leadership. Next, we provide an overview of our focal leader (Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.) and the values lexicon methodology used to assess his espoused values through his most prominent speeches and sermons. Finally, results are presented, followed by the discussion section and conclusion.Literature reviewValuesValues are defined in numerous ways in the literature, sometimes with little agreement between definitions. Yukl (1998) contended that values are \\\"internalized attitudes about what is right and wrong, ethical or unethical, moral and unmoral\\\" (Yukl, 1998, p. 234). Meglino and Ravlin (1998) viewed values in concert with behavior, suggesting that values are \\\"a person's internalized belief about how he or she should or ought to behave\\\" (p. 354). A common definition, suggested by Rokeach (1973, p. 5), views a value as \\\"an enduring belief that a specific mode of conduct or end state of existence is personally or socially preferable to an opposite or converse mode of conduct or end-state of existence.\\\"Following Rokeach (1973), Schwartz (1992) developed a theory of basic human values based on ten values that focus on the motivation of the individual: Power, Achievement, Hedonism, Stimulation, Self-direction, Universalism, Benevolence, Tradition, Conformity, and Security (Appendix A provides a description of each value). …\",\"PeriodicalId\":90357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.3709.2015.ju.00007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of applied management and entrepreneurship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.3709.2015.ju.00007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
我们需要重新发现的第一个价值原则是:所有的现实都取决于道德基础(小马丁·路德·金博士在他的布道《重新发现失去的价值观》中)。1954年,马丁·路德·金在密歇根州底特律的第二浸信会教堂担任客座牧师,发表了题为“重新发现失去的价值观”的布道。在整个布道中,金博士(一位民权领袖,乔治亚州亚特兰大埃比尼泽浸信会的牧师)讨论了他的信念,即我们的价值观已经变得更糟了。他指出,人们倾向于改变自己的价值观和道德来适应特定的情况,并敦促会众理解“所有的现实都取决于道德基础”。虽然金博士多年前发表了这篇讲道,但基于价值观的领导方法(即,转型,真实,精神,仆人,魅力,道德等)的概念仍然是领导力中当前和高度研究的主题。基于价值观的领导方法的基本原则是,领导者可以而且应该影响追随者的价值观,以激励员工并实现卓越的绩效(volio et al., 2009)。这个想法并不新鲜,正如切斯特·巴纳德(Chester Barnard, 1938,第279页)所说,“管理责任的显著标志是,它不仅要求遵守复杂的道德准则,还要求为他人创造道德准则。”然而,这些价值观的起源问题在领导方法中有所不同,价值观的具体作用往往属于两种不同的观点。一些方法认为领导者的价值观是普遍的;换句话说,领导者总是把他/她的个人价值观灌输给他们的追随者。其他方法认为,领导者所信奉的价值观取决于环境,可以是领导者的个人价值观,也可以是组织的价值观,甚至可以是为了满足追随者的期望而调整的价值观(Shamir, 2007)。这种区别很重要,因为追随者经常将领导者所信奉的价值观与他们自己的价值观联系起来,这会影响他们对领导者使命的承诺和他们的整体绩效(Brown and Trevino, 2009)。基于价值观的领导取决于所传达的道德内容(Burns, 1998),领导者可能会传授组织或情境所规定的价值观,而不是领导者的个人价值观(Carlson and Perrewe, 1995)。因此,本文的目的是探讨领导内部价值观的一致性,以接近普遍与语境辩论。为此,我们首先回顾了当前的文献,其中包括价值观的概述,以及基于价值观的领导的具体背景和普遍方法。接下来,我们将概述我们的核心领袖(小马丁·路德·金博士),以及通过他最著名的演讲和布道来评估他所信奉的价值观的价值观词典方法。最后给出了结果,接着是讨论部分和结论。文献综述value在文献中以多种方式定义value,有时定义之间很少一致。Yukl(1998)认为价值观是“关于什么是对与错,伦理或不道德,道德和不道德的内化态度”(Yukl, 1998, p. 234)。Meglino和Ravlin(1998)认为价值观与行为是一致的,认为价值观是“一个人关于他或她应该如何行为的内在信念”(第354页)。Rokeach(1973,第5页)提出了一个常见的定义,将价值观视为“一种持久的信念,即特定的行为模式或最终存在状态在个人或社会上优于相反或相反的行为模式或最终存在状态。”继Rokeach(1973)之后,Schwartz(1992)发展了一个关于人类基本价值观的理论,其基础是关注个人动机的十个价值观:权力、成就、享乐主义、刺激、自我导向、普遍主义、仁慈、传统、顺从和安全(附录a提供了对每个价值观的描述)。…
Rediscovering Lost Values: Exploring Contextual and Universal Views of Values within Leadership
. . .the first principle of value that we need to rediscover is this: that all reality hinges on moral foundations (Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in his sermon, "Rediscovering Lost Values").Dr. martin luther king, jr. delivered the "Rediscovering Lost Values" sermon as a guest minister at Second Baptist Church in Detroit, MI in 1954. Throughout the sermon, Dr. King (a civil rights leader and pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, GA) discusses his belief that our values have taken a turn for the worse. He states that people tend to change their values and morals to fit the given situation, and urges the congregation to understand that "all reality hinges on moral foundations."While Dr. King delivered this sermon many years ago, the concept of valuesbased approaches to leadership (i.e., transformational, authentic, spiritual, servant, charismatic, ethical, etc.) is still a current and highly researched topic in leadership. The basic tenet of values-based approaches to leadership is that leaders can and should influence followers' values in order to motivate employees and achieve superior performance (Avolio et al., 2009). This idea is not new, as Chester Barnard (1938, p. 279) stated, "the distinguishing mark of managerial responsibility is that it requires not merely conformance to a complex code of morals but also the creation of moral codes for others." However, the question of the origin of these values differs within leadership approaches, where the specific role of values tends to fall within two separate views. Some approaches view leader values as universal; in other words, the leader always espouses his/her personal values to their followers. Other approaches contend that the leader's espoused values depend on the context, and could be either the leader's personal values, those of the organization, or even aligned to meet the expectations of their followers (Shamir, 2007). This distinction is important because followers often link the leader's espoused values with their own, which impacts their commitment to the leader's mission and their overall performance (Brown and Trevino, 2009). Values-based leadership depends on the moral content conveyed (Burns, 1998), and the leader may impart the values set forth by the organization or the situation instead of the leader's personal values (Carlson and Perrewe, 1995).Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the alignment of values within leadership in order to approach the universal versus contextual debate. To that end, we begin with a review of the current literature, which includes an overview of values, as well as context-specific and universal approaches to valuesbased leadership. Next, we provide an overview of our focal leader (Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.) and the values lexicon methodology used to assess his espoused values through his most prominent speeches and sermons. Finally, results are presented, followed by the discussion section and conclusion.Literature reviewValuesValues are defined in numerous ways in the literature, sometimes with little agreement between definitions. Yukl (1998) contended that values are "internalized attitudes about what is right and wrong, ethical or unethical, moral and unmoral" (Yukl, 1998, p. 234). Meglino and Ravlin (1998) viewed values in concert with behavior, suggesting that values are "a person's internalized belief about how he or she should or ought to behave" (p. 354). A common definition, suggested by Rokeach (1973, p. 5), views a value as "an enduring belief that a specific mode of conduct or end state of existence is personally or socially preferable to an opposite or converse mode of conduct or end-state of existence."Following Rokeach (1973), Schwartz (1992) developed a theory of basic human values based on ten values that focus on the motivation of the individual: Power, Achievement, Hedonism, Stimulation, Self-direction, Universalism, Benevolence, Tradition, Conformity, and Security (Appendix A provides a description of each value). …