Epicuro前后:卢克雷齐奥自然界文明的起源和发展

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
F. Staderini
{"title":"Epicuro前后:卢克雷齐奥自然界文明的起源和发展","authors":"F. Staderini","doi":"10.7408/EPKN.V4I1-2.94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Book 5 of De rerum natura, Lucretius offers a rational reconstruction of human prehistory. His aim is to get rid of the mythological tales that envisage human progress as the result of a providential intervention. In Lucretius' view, history is a gradual and non-univocal process, triggered by the need for something useful and developed through the discoveries of human ingenium. \nIn this paper, I argue that Lucretius sees human history as an amoral process, since from an Epicurean perspective there can be no moral meaning before the teachings of Epicurus about the limits of desires and pleasure. Therefore, Epicurus plays a key role in the cultural and social development of human civilization, and Lucretius depicts him as a quasi-divine figure. I argue that the poet’s purpose is to present Epicurus and Venus (qua personification of Epicurean hedonism) as the new patrons of Roman culture, thus replacing Mars and Hercules (the patrons of military expansionism) as well as Cybele (the personification of the mother earth, presiding over the nation's defence). \nHowever, this is not the only strategy adopted by Lucretius in order to show the importance of his master’s philosophy to cultural history. At another level of the text, Lucretius also attempts to contextualize Epicurus' doctrine by showing that this is an ars among the others. Such an ars meets a fundamental need of man – i.e. to live happily, without moral fears and physical pain – by appealing to human rationality – i.e. to the study of natural phenomena and the invention of useful technai. Lucretius intentionally compares Epicureanism with another pleasant art, i.e. music, in order to show that the pleasure brought by Epicurus' philosophy and the one sought by music are of two very different kinds. The former is the katastematic pleasure of ataraxia (the liberation of human mind from the fear of death and of the gods), while the latter is the kinetic pleasure deriving from an incessant and disquieting desire for something new. In its conclusion, the paper recalls the Epicurean belief in the advent of a blessed time, when all mankind will reach ataraxia and the dramatic course of history will definitely be over.","PeriodicalId":40097,"journal":{"name":"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prima e dopo Epicuro: origine e sviluppo della civiltà nel De rerum natura di Lucrezio\",\"authors\":\"F. Staderini\",\"doi\":\"10.7408/EPKN.V4I1-2.94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Book 5 of De rerum natura, Lucretius offers a rational reconstruction of human prehistory. His aim is to get rid of the mythological tales that envisage human progress as the result of a providential intervention. In Lucretius' view, history is a gradual and non-univocal process, triggered by the need for something useful and developed through the discoveries of human ingenium. \\nIn this paper, I argue that Lucretius sees human history as an amoral process, since from an Epicurean perspective there can be no moral meaning before the teachings of Epicurus about the limits of desires and pleasure. Therefore, Epicurus plays a key role in the cultural and social development of human civilization, and Lucretius depicts him as a quasi-divine figure. I argue that the poet’s purpose is to present Epicurus and Venus (qua personification of Epicurean hedonism) as the new patrons of Roman culture, thus replacing Mars and Hercules (the patrons of military expansionism) as well as Cybele (the personification of the mother earth, presiding over the nation's defence). \\nHowever, this is not the only strategy adopted by Lucretius in order to show the importance of his master’s philosophy to cultural history. At another level of the text, Lucretius also attempts to contextualize Epicurus' doctrine by showing that this is an ars among the others. Such an ars meets a fundamental need of man – i.e. to live happily, without moral fears and physical pain – by appealing to human rationality – i.e. to the study of natural phenomena and the invention of useful technai. Lucretius intentionally compares Epicureanism with another pleasant art, i.e. music, in order to show that the pleasure brought by Epicurus' philosophy and the one sought by music are of two very different kinds. The former is the katastematic pleasure of ataraxia (the liberation of human mind from the fear of death and of the gods), while the latter is the kinetic pleasure deriving from an incessant and disquieting desire for something new. In its conclusion, the paper recalls the Epicurean belief in the advent of a blessed time, when all mankind will reach ataraxia and the dramatic course of history will definitely be over.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7408/EPKN.V4I1-2.94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epekeina-International Journal of Ontology History and Critics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7408/EPKN.V4I1-2.94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《论自然论》第五卷中,卢克莱修对人类史前历史进行了理性的重构。他的目标是摆脱那些把人类的进步想象成天意干预的结果的神话故事。在卢克莱修看来,历史是一个渐进的、非单一的过程,它是由对有用事物的需求引发的,并通过人类智慧的发现而发展起来的。在本文中,我认为卢克莱修认为人类历史是一个非道德的过程,因为从伊壁鸠鲁的角度来看,在伊壁鸠鲁关于欲望和快乐的限制的教导之前,不可能有道德意义。因此,伊壁鸠鲁在人类文明的文化和社会发展中起着至关重要的作用,卢克莱修把他描绘成一个准神的人物。我认为诗人的目的是将伊壁鸠鲁和维纳斯(伊壁鸠鲁享乐主义的拟人化)呈现为罗马文化的新赞助人,从而取代马尔斯和赫拉克勒斯(军事扩张主义的赞助人)以及西布莉(地球母亲的拟人化,主持国家的防御)。然而,这并不是卢克莱修为了显示其大师的哲学对文化史的重要性而采取的唯一策略。在文本的另一个层面上,卢克莱修还试图将伊壁鸠鲁的学说置于语境中,表明这是众多学说中的一个。这种艺术通过诉诸人类的理性,即研究自然现象和发明有用的技术,满足了人类的一种基本需要,即快乐地生活,没有道德恐惧和身体痛苦。卢克莱修有意将伊壁鸠鲁哲学与另一种令人愉悦的艺术即音乐进行比较,以表明伊壁鸠鲁哲学所带来的愉悦与音乐所追求的愉悦是两种截然不同的快感。前者是失调性的灾难性快乐(人类思想从对死亡和神的恐惧中解放出来),而后者是动态的快乐,来自对新事物的不断的、令人不安的渴望。在结语中,本文回顾了伊比鸠鲁学派的信仰,即一个幸福的时代将到来,届时全人类将达到无政府状态,戏剧性的历史进程必将结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prima e dopo Epicuro: origine e sviluppo della civiltà nel De rerum natura di Lucrezio
In Book 5 of De rerum natura, Lucretius offers a rational reconstruction of human prehistory. His aim is to get rid of the mythological tales that envisage human progress as the result of a providential intervention. In Lucretius' view, history is a gradual and non-univocal process, triggered by the need for something useful and developed through the discoveries of human ingenium. In this paper, I argue that Lucretius sees human history as an amoral process, since from an Epicurean perspective there can be no moral meaning before the teachings of Epicurus about the limits of desires and pleasure. Therefore, Epicurus plays a key role in the cultural and social development of human civilization, and Lucretius depicts him as a quasi-divine figure. I argue that the poet’s purpose is to present Epicurus and Venus (qua personification of Epicurean hedonism) as the new patrons of Roman culture, thus replacing Mars and Hercules (the patrons of military expansionism) as well as Cybele (the personification of the mother earth, presiding over the nation's defence). However, this is not the only strategy adopted by Lucretius in order to show the importance of his master’s philosophy to cultural history. At another level of the text, Lucretius also attempts to contextualize Epicurus' doctrine by showing that this is an ars among the others. Such an ars meets a fundamental need of man – i.e. to live happily, without moral fears and physical pain – by appealing to human rationality – i.e. to the study of natural phenomena and the invention of useful technai. Lucretius intentionally compares Epicureanism with another pleasant art, i.e. music, in order to show that the pleasure brought by Epicurus' philosophy and the one sought by music are of two very different kinds. The former is the katastematic pleasure of ataraxia (the liberation of human mind from the fear of death and of the gods), while the latter is the kinetic pleasure deriving from an incessant and disquieting desire for something new. In its conclusion, the paper recalls the Epicurean belief in the advent of a blessed time, when all mankind will reach ataraxia and the dramatic course of history will definitely be over.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信