美国西南部单轴跟踪光伏系统辐照度转换模型的评估

S. MacAlpine, Chris W. Wolfrom, O. Westbrook
{"title":"美国西南部单轴跟踪光伏系统辐照度转换模型的评估","authors":"S. MacAlpine, Chris W. Wolfrom, O. Westbrook","doi":"10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work examines the accuracy of commonlyused irradiance decomposition and transposition models when modeling single-axis tracking photovoltaic (PV) arrays in the southwestern United States. Inputs to the models include measured one-minute global horizontal, diffuse horizontal, and direct normal irradiance. The bias and variability associated with decomposition models’ predictions are analyzed and compared according to sky clearness and solar zenith angle, with results varying widely depending on the model employed. Separately, transposition model predictions are compared to measured plane-of-array (POA) irradiance at an operating PV plant with single-axis tracking. Goodagreement is found between the transposition models’ predictions and measured irradiance on clear sky days, with an absolute mean bias difference of $< 2$% for all anisotropic models. The decomposition and transposition models are then combined, with their predictions compared to measured POA irradiance at a second tracking PV plant on an annual and seasonal basis. Morevariability and bias are seen when both decomposition and transposition are performed, though good agreement with measured data is still possible with some model combinations.","PeriodicalId":6558,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC)","volume":"59 1","pages":"2325-2330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Irradiance Transposition Models When Utilized with Single Axis Tracking PV Systems in the Southwestern United States\",\"authors\":\"S. MacAlpine, Chris W. Wolfrom, O. Westbrook\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work examines the accuracy of commonlyused irradiance decomposition and transposition models when modeling single-axis tracking photovoltaic (PV) arrays in the southwestern United States. Inputs to the models include measured one-minute global horizontal, diffuse horizontal, and direct normal irradiance. The bias and variability associated with decomposition models’ predictions are analyzed and compared according to sky clearness and solar zenith angle, with results varying widely depending on the model employed. Separately, transposition model predictions are compared to measured plane-of-array (POA) irradiance at an operating PV plant with single-axis tracking. Goodagreement is found between the transposition models’ predictions and measured irradiance on clear sky days, with an absolute mean bias difference of $< 2$% for all anisotropic models. The decomposition and transposition models are then combined, with their predictions compared to measured POA irradiance at a second tracking PV plant on an annual and seasonal basis. Morevariability and bias are seen when both decomposition and transposition are performed, though good agreement with measured data is still possible with some model combinations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC)\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"2325-2330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE 7th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (WCPEC) (A Joint Conference of 45th IEEE PVSC, 28th PVSEC & 34th EU PVSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2018.8547777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了美国西南部单轴跟踪光伏(PV)阵列建模时常用的辐照度分解和转位模型的准确性。模型的输入包括测量的一分钟全球水平、漫射水平和直接正常辐照度。根据天空晴朗度和太阳天顶角对分解模式预测的偏差和变率进行了分析和比较,结果因所采用的模式而有很大差异。另外,将转置模型预测与单轴跟踪的运行光伏电站的测量平面阵列(POA)辐照度进行比较。在晴空天,转位模型的预测结果与实测辐照度吻合良好,所有各向异性模型的绝对平均偏差均< 2%。然后将分解和转置模型结合起来,并将其预测与第二个跟踪光伏电站每年和季节性测量的POA辐照度进行比较。当进行分解和转置时,可以看到更多的变异性和偏差,尽管一些模型组合仍然可能与测量数据保持良好的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Irradiance Transposition Models When Utilized with Single Axis Tracking PV Systems in the Southwestern United States
This work examines the accuracy of commonlyused irradiance decomposition and transposition models when modeling single-axis tracking photovoltaic (PV) arrays in the southwestern United States. Inputs to the models include measured one-minute global horizontal, diffuse horizontal, and direct normal irradiance. The bias and variability associated with decomposition models’ predictions are analyzed and compared according to sky clearness and solar zenith angle, with results varying widely depending on the model employed. Separately, transposition model predictions are compared to measured plane-of-array (POA) irradiance at an operating PV plant with single-axis tracking. Goodagreement is found between the transposition models’ predictions and measured irradiance on clear sky days, with an absolute mean bias difference of $< 2$% for all anisotropic models. The decomposition and transposition models are then combined, with their predictions compared to measured POA irradiance at a second tracking PV plant on an annual and seasonal basis. Morevariability and bias are seen when both decomposition and transposition are performed, though good agreement with measured data is still possible with some model combinations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信