胸痛合并疑似急性冠脉综合征患者院前转运中的先进干预措施

Mitchell Cleghorn, F. Mencl, Daniel Johnson
{"title":"胸痛合并疑似急性冠脉综合征患者院前转运中的先进干预措施","authors":"Mitchell Cleghorn, F. Mencl, Daniel Johnson","doi":"10.56068/egzn2255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the frequency and type of advanced (ALS) interventions performed by emergency medical services (EMS) providers while caring for undifferentiated chest pain patients.\nMethods: This pilot study is a retrospective review of advanced interventions performed on consecutive adult patients transported by EMS with a provider impression of non-traumatic chest pain and treated under the suspected acute coronary syndrome statewide protocol from July 2013 through January 2022. The EMS system studied is a hospital-based agency which serves a large suburban to rural population in central Pennsylvania. Advanced interventions were defined a priori and included STEMI activation.\nResults: During the study period, there were 2 456 EMS transports out of 97 877 which met study inclusion criteria. A total of 121 advanced interventions were performed on 101 (4.1%) of these patients, the majority 79 (3.2%) of which were prehospital notification of STEMI activations. Intravenous medications were administered 25 times to 22 (0.9%) patients and advanced procedures were performed 17 times on 7 (0.3%) patients. Several patients received more than one intervention and/or medication. Patients between 60 and 65 years of age accounted for the highest number of activations (283, 11.5%) and received the largest number of interventions (28, 9.9%). Only eight patients were below the age of 45 and all were STEMI activations only.\nConclusion: We found that less than 5% of included patients transported by EMS required advanced interventions with the majority of these being STEMI activations not requiring any additional interventions. Further investigation is required to determine if certain characteristics or risk-factors predict the need for out-of-hospital advanced interventions and ALS transport.","PeriodicalId":73465,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paramedicine","volume":"26 20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced Interventions During Prehospital Transport of Patients with Chest Pain and Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Mitchell Cleghorn, F. Mencl, Daniel Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.56068/egzn2255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the frequency and type of advanced (ALS) interventions performed by emergency medical services (EMS) providers while caring for undifferentiated chest pain patients.\\nMethods: This pilot study is a retrospective review of advanced interventions performed on consecutive adult patients transported by EMS with a provider impression of non-traumatic chest pain and treated under the suspected acute coronary syndrome statewide protocol from July 2013 through January 2022. The EMS system studied is a hospital-based agency which serves a large suburban to rural population in central Pennsylvania. Advanced interventions were defined a priori and included STEMI activation.\\nResults: During the study period, there were 2 456 EMS transports out of 97 877 which met study inclusion criteria. A total of 121 advanced interventions were performed on 101 (4.1%) of these patients, the majority 79 (3.2%) of which were prehospital notification of STEMI activations. Intravenous medications were administered 25 times to 22 (0.9%) patients and advanced procedures were performed 17 times on 7 (0.3%) patients. Several patients received more than one intervention and/or medication. Patients between 60 and 65 years of age accounted for the highest number of activations (283, 11.5%) and received the largest number of interventions (28, 9.9%). Only eight patients were below the age of 45 and all were STEMI activations only.\\nConclusion: We found that less than 5% of included patients transported by EMS required advanced interventions with the majority of these being STEMI activations not requiring any additional interventions. Further investigation is required to determine if certain characteristics or risk-factors predict the need for out-of-hospital advanced interventions and ALS transport.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of paramedicine\",\"volume\":\"26 20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of paramedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56068/egzn2255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paramedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56068/egzn2255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是描述急诊医疗服务(EMS)提供者在照顾未分化胸痛患者时进行的晚期(ALS)干预的频率和类型。方法:这项试点研究是对2013年7月至2022年1月期间EMS运送的连续成年患者的先进干预措施的回顾性回顾,这些患者的提供者印象为非创伤性胸痛,并在疑似急性冠状动脉综合征的全州方案下治疗。所研究的EMS系统是一家以医院为基础的机构,服务于宾夕法尼亚州中部郊区到农村的大量人口。高级干预措施是先验定义的,包括STEMI激活。结果:在研究期间,97 877辆EMS运输车中有2 456辆符合研究纳入标准。对101例(4.1%)患者进行了121次晚期干预,其中79例(3.2%)是院前STEMI激活通知。22例(0.9%)患者接受静脉药物治疗25次,7例(0.3%)患者接受先进手术17次。一些患者接受了一种以上的干预和/或药物治疗。60 - 65岁的患者激活次数最多(283次,11.5%),接受干预的次数最多(28次,9.9%)。只有8例患者年龄在45岁以下,且均为STEMI激活。结论:我们发现通过EMS转运的患者中不到5%需要高级干预,其中大多数是STEMI激活,不需要任何额外的干预。需要进一步调查以确定某些特征或风险因素是否预测院外高级干预和渐冻症转移的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advanced Interventions During Prehospital Transport of Patients with Chest Pain and Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome
Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the frequency and type of advanced (ALS) interventions performed by emergency medical services (EMS) providers while caring for undifferentiated chest pain patients. Methods: This pilot study is a retrospective review of advanced interventions performed on consecutive adult patients transported by EMS with a provider impression of non-traumatic chest pain and treated under the suspected acute coronary syndrome statewide protocol from July 2013 through January 2022. The EMS system studied is a hospital-based agency which serves a large suburban to rural population in central Pennsylvania. Advanced interventions were defined a priori and included STEMI activation. Results: During the study period, there were 2 456 EMS transports out of 97 877 which met study inclusion criteria. A total of 121 advanced interventions were performed on 101 (4.1%) of these patients, the majority 79 (3.2%) of which were prehospital notification of STEMI activations. Intravenous medications were administered 25 times to 22 (0.9%) patients and advanced procedures were performed 17 times on 7 (0.3%) patients. Several patients received more than one intervention and/or medication. Patients between 60 and 65 years of age accounted for the highest number of activations (283, 11.5%) and received the largest number of interventions (28, 9.9%). Only eight patients were below the age of 45 and all were STEMI activations only. Conclusion: We found that less than 5% of included patients transported by EMS required advanced interventions with the majority of these being STEMI activations not requiring any additional interventions. Further investigation is required to determine if certain characteristics or risk-factors predict the need for out-of-hospital advanced interventions and ALS transport.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信