超越使命漂移:理解社会企业使命中的脆弱空间

IF 2.8 Q2 BUSINESS
Fernanda Golbspan Lutz, M. Petrini, Natalia Aguilar Delgado
{"title":"超越使命漂移:理解社会企业使命中的脆弱空间","authors":"Fernanda Golbspan Lutz, M. Petrini, Natalia Aguilar Delgado","doi":"10.1108/sej-11-2022-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nPrevious literature has emphasized that social enterprises (SEs) are challenged by their pursuit of divergent social and financial goals, often resulting in tensions leading to a mission drift. This study aims to provide an alternative view wherein these organizations fail to make deliberate and exclusive choices between their goals. In this paper, the authors critically review previous findings on mission drift and present a new concept built on the paradox theory.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis conceptual paper draws upon previous literature on mission drift in SEs. The authors took an integrative review approach to provide an overview of the topic in which the research is still interdisciplinary. The paradox theory approach has been used to guide the discussion and expand the findings.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors put forward the concept of spaces of vulnerability, which arise from the tensions faced by SEs between their social and financial objectives and which can lead them to suffer mission drift. The authors propose to shift attention from the sources and strategies of mission drift to the processes involved in the composition of those spaces where missions can become more vulnerable but not necessarily drift.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis perspective adds value to practitioners by increasing the likelihood of SEs surviving multiple logics and clarifying conflicts between social and financial goals in advance. Founders and managers might not only balance their dual missions but also understand their respective roots underlying typologies with regards to decision-making.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe authors enrich the literature by exploring how SEs can deal with tensions related to their multiple goals and sustain their social mission in the long term by offering a theoretical discussion and new forms to consider their dual objectives.\n","PeriodicalId":46809,"journal":{"name":"Social Enterprise Journal","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond mission drift: understanding the spaces of vulnerability in social enterprises’ missions\",\"authors\":\"Fernanda Golbspan Lutz, M. Petrini, Natalia Aguilar Delgado\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sej-11-2022-0104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nPrevious literature has emphasized that social enterprises (SEs) are challenged by their pursuit of divergent social and financial goals, often resulting in tensions leading to a mission drift. This study aims to provide an alternative view wherein these organizations fail to make deliberate and exclusive choices between their goals. In this paper, the authors critically review previous findings on mission drift and present a new concept built on the paradox theory.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis conceptual paper draws upon previous literature on mission drift in SEs. The authors took an integrative review approach to provide an overview of the topic in which the research is still interdisciplinary. The paradox theory approach has been used to guide the discussion and expand the findings.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe authors put forward the concept of spaces of vulnerability, which arise from the tensions faced by SEs between their social and financial objectives and which can lead them to suffer mission drift. The authors propose to shift attention from the sources and strategies of mission drift to the processes involved in the composition of those spaces where missions can become more vulnerable but not necessarily drift.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis perspective adds value to practitioners by increasing the likelihood of SEs surviving multiple logics and clarifying conflicts between social and financial goals in advance. Founders and managers might not only balance their dual missions but also understand their respective roots underlying typologies with regards to decision-making.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe authors enrich the literature by exploring how SEs can deal with tensions related to their multiple goals and sustain their social mission in the long term by offering a theoretical discussion and new forms to consider their dual objectives.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Enterprise Journal\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Enterprise Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-11-2022-0104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Enterprise Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-11-2022-0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的文献强调,社会企业(SEs)面临着追求不同的社会和财务目标的挑战,往往导致紧张局势导致使命漂移。本研究旨在提供另一种观点,其中这些组织未能在其目标之间做出深思熟虑和排他性的选择。在本文中,作者批判性地回顾了以往关于任务漂移的研究成果,并提出了一个基于悖论理论的新概念。设计/方法/方法这篇概念性论文借鉴了以前关于SEs任务漂移的文献。作者采取了一种综合的回顾方法来提供一个主题的概述,其中的研究仍然是跨学科的。本文采用悖论理论的方法来指导讨论和扩展研究结果。研究结果:作者提出了脆弱性空间的概念,脆弱性空间产生于中小企业面临的社会和经济目标之间的紧张关系,并可能导致他们遭受使命漂移。作者建议将注意力从任务漂移的来源和策略转移到任务可能变得更脆弱但不一定漂移的空间组成过程中。实践意义:这种观点增加了企业在多重逻辑中生存的可能性,并提前澄清了社会和财务目标之间的冲突,从而为从业者增加了价值。创始人和管理者可能不仅要平衡他们的双重使命,还要了解他们各自在决策方面的根源和潜在类型。原创性/价值作者通过提供理论讨论和考虑其双重目标的新形式,探索企业如何处理与其多重目标相关的紧张关系,并长期维持其社会使命,从而丰富了文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond mission drift: understanding the spaces of vulnerability in social enterprises’ missions
Purpose Previous literature has emphasized that social enterprises (SEs) are challenged by their pursuit of divergent social and financial goals, often resulting in tensions leading to a mission drift. This study aims to provide an alternative view wherein these organizations fail to make deliberate and exclusive choices between their goals. In this paper, the authors critically review previous findings on mission drift and present a new concept built on the paradox theory. Design/methodology/approach This conceptual paper draws upon previous literature on mission drift in SEs. The authors took an integrative review approach to provide an overview of the topic in which the research is still interdisciplinary. The paradox theory approach has been used to guide the discussion and expand the findings. Findings The authors put forward the concept of spaces of vulnerability, which arise from the tensions faced by SEs between their social and financial objectives and which can lead them to suffer mission drift. The authors propose to shift attention from the sources and strategies of mission drift to the processes involved in the composition of those spaces where missions can become more vulnerable but not necessarily drift. Practical implications This perspective adds value to practitioners by increasing the likelihood of SEs surviving multiple logics and clarifying conflicts between social and financial goals in advance. Founders and managers might not only balance their dual missions but also understand their respective roots underlying typologies with regards to decision-making. Originality/value The authors enrich the literature by exploring how SEs can deal with tensions related to their multiple goals and sustain their social mission in the long term by offering a theoretical discussion and new forms to consider their dual objectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信