CHA2DS2 - Vasc评分预测初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无再流现象

E. A. Eldarky, Eman Saied Elkeshk, Amr Elsayed Elnager,  Mikel Magdy Selim Soliman
{"title":"CHA2DS2 - Vasc评分预测初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无再流现象","authors":"E. A. Eldarky, Eman Saied Elkeshk, Amr Elsayed Elnager,  Mikel Magdy Selim Soliman","doi":"10.47672/ajhmn.1420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction is the most acute manifestation of Coronary artery disease, with substantial morbidity and mortality. Early reperfusion (re-establishing the blood flow in the occluded artery) is the most effective way to preserve the viability of the ischaemic myocardium and limit infarct size. Early diagnosis of STEMI is crucial to initiate appropriate treatment and should ideally be made within 10 minutes of first medical contact. This study aimed to evaluate the CHA2DS2-VASc score as a simple tool for predicting the no-reflow among patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. \nMethodology: This was a case-control study which was conducted on 100 patients, diagnosed with acute STEMI and underwent primary PCI, who was admitted to Cardiology Department, Benha University Hospital and National Heart Institute. Patients were classified into two groups, control and no-flow, according to their final angiographic TIMI flow rates resulting from primary PCI. The control group: 78 patients with TIMI flow rate >2. The no-reflow group: 22 patients with TIMI flow rate ≤2, despite mechanical reopening of the infarct-related artery in patients without dissection of the coronary artery. \nFindings: In this study, LVEF was significantly lower in patients with no-reflow compared to patients with normal TIMI flow (p <0.001), but LVEDV was significantly higher (p =0.01). There was no significant difference in LVESV between patients with no-reflow compared to patients with normal TIMI flow. CHA2DS2VASC score was significantly higher in patients with no-reflow compared to patients with normal TIMI flow (p <0.001). CHA2DS2VASC score is a significant predictor of occurrence of no reflow phenomenon (AUC: 0.689, p =0.006). At a cut off value of ≥ 2it has a sensitivity of 68.2%, specificity of 58.9%, PPV of 31.9% and NPV of 86.8%. \nRecommendation: The study suggest that the CHA2DS2‑VASc score can be an independent predictor of no‑reflow phenomenon in patients undergoing primary PCI. As a simple and easy‑to‑calculate score, it might be a useful assessment tool to predict no‑reflow phenomenon before primary PCI interventions in patients with STEMI. Thus we recommend using CHA2DS2-VASc score as it is very simple and a quick tool to predict no-reflow before primary PCI","PeriodicalId":7672,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHA2DS2 - Vasc Score Predict No Reflow Phenomenon in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention\",\"authors\":\"E. A. Eldarky, Eman Saied Elkeshk, Amr Elsayed Elnager,  Mikel Magdy Selim Soliman\",\"doi\":\"10.47672/ajhmn.1420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction is the most acute manifestation of Coronary artery disease, with substantial morbidity and mortality. Early reperfusion (re-establishing the blood flow in the occluded artery) is the most effective way to preserve the viability of the ischaemic myocardium and limit infarct size. Early diagnosis of STEMI is crucial to initiate appropriate treatment and should ideally be made within 10 minutes of first medical contact. This study aimed to evaluate the CHA2DS2-VASc score as a simple tool for predicting the no-reflow among patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. \\nMethodology: This was a case-control study which was conducted on 100 patients, diagnosed with acute STEMI and underwent primary PCI, who was admitted to Cardiology Department, Benha University Hospital and National Heart Institute. Patients were classified into two groups, control and no-flow, according to their final angiographic TIMI flow rates resulting from primary PCI. The control group: 78 patients with TIMI flow rate >2. The no-reflow group: 22 patients with TIMI flow rate ≤2, despite mechanical reopening of the infarct-related artery in patients without dissection of the coronary artery. \\nFindings: In this study, LVEF was significantly lower in patients with no-reflow compared to patients with normal TIMI flow (p <0.001), but LVEDV was significantly higher (p =0.01). There was no significant difference in LVESV between patients with no-reflow compared to patients with normal TIMI flow. CHA2DS2VASC score was significantly higher in patients with no-reflow compared to patients with normal TIMI flow (p <0.001). CHA2DS2VASC score is a significant predictor of occurrence of no reflow phenomenon (AUC: 0.689, p =0.006). At a cut off value of ≥ 2it has a sensitivity of 68.2%, specificity of 58.9%, PPV of 31.9% and NPV of 86.8%. \\nRecommendation: The study suggest that the CHA2DS2‑VASc score can be an independent predictor of no‑reflow phenomenon in patients undergoing primary PCI. As a simple and easy‑to‑calculate score, it might be a useful assessment tool to predict no‑reflow phenomenon before primary PCI interventions in patients with STEMI. Thus we recommend using CHA2DS2-VASc score as it is very simple and a quick tool to predict no-reflow before primary PCI\",\"PeriodicalId\":7672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajhmn.1420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ajhmn.1420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:st段抬高型心肌梗死是冠状动脉疾病最急性的表现,发病率和死亡率都很高。早期再灌注(重新建立闭塞动脉的血流)是保持缺血心肌活力和限制梗死面积的最有效方法。STEMI的早期诊断对于开始适当治疗至关重要,理想情况下应在首次医疗接触后10分钟内做出诊断。本研究旨在评估CHA2DS2-VASc评分作为预测STEMI患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无血流再流的简单工具。方法:本研究为病例对照研究,纳入本哈大学医院心内科、国立心脏研究所诊断为急性STEMI并行首次PCI的100例患者。根据首次PCI后患者的最终血管造影TIMI血流率,将患者分为对照组和无血流组。对照组:78例患者TIMI流速>2。无再流组:22例患者TIMI血流率≤2,尽管机械重开梗死相关动脉,但未剥离冠状动脉。结果:本研究中,无回流患者的LVEF明显低于TIMI血流正常患者(p <0.001),但LVEDV明显高于TIMI血流正常患者(p =0.01)。与TIMI血流正常的患者相比,无回流患者的LVESV无显著差异。无回流患者的CHA2DS2VASC评分明显高于TIMI血流正常患者(p <0.001)。CHA2DS2VASC评分是无血流现象发生的显著预测因子(AUC: 0.689, p =0.006)。在截断值≥2时,其敏感性为68.2%,特异性为58.9%,PPV为31.9%,NPV为86.8%。建议:该研究提示CHA2DS2 - VASc评分可作为原发性PCI患者无血流现象的独立预测指标。作为一个简单且易于计算的评分,它可能是一个有用的评估工具,用于预测STEMI患者在初次PCI干预前无再流现象。因此,我们推荐使用CHA2DS2-VASc评分,因为它是一种非常简单和快速的工具,可以在初次PCI之前预测无再流
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CHA2DS2 - Vasc Score Predict No Reflow Phenomenon in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Purpose: ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction is the most acute manifestation of Coronary artery disease, with substantial morbidity and mortality. Early reperfusion (re-establishing the blood flow in the occluded artery) is the most effective way to preserve the viability of the ischaemic myocardium and limit infarct size. Early diagnosis of STEMI is crucial to initiate appropriate treatment and should ideally be made within 10 minutes of first medical contact. This study aimed to evaluate the CHA2DS2-VASc score as a simple tool for predicting the no-reflow among patients with STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methodology: This was a case-control study which was conducted on 100 patients, diagnosed with acute STEMI and underwent primary PCI, who was admitted to Cardiology Department, Benha University Hospital and National Heart Institute. Patients were classified into two groups, control and no-flow, according to their final angiographic TIMI flow rates resulting from primary PCI. The control group: 78 patients with TIMI flow rate >2. The no-reflow group: 22 patients with TIMI flow rate ≤2, despite mechanical reopening of the infarct-related artery in patients without dissection of the coronary artery. Findings: In this study, LVEF was significantly lower in patients with no-reflow compared to patients with normal TIMI flow (p <0.001), but LVEDV was significantly higher (p =0.01). There was no significant difference in LVESV between patients with no-reflow compared to patients with normal TIMI flow. CHA2DS2VASC score was significantly higher in patients with no-reflow compared to patients with normal TIMI flow (p <0.001). CHA2DS2VASC score is a significant predictor of occurrence of no reflow phenomenon (AUC: 0.689, p =0.006). At a cut off value of ≥ 2it has a sensitivity of 68.2%, specificity of 58.9%, PPV of 31.9% and NPV of 86.8%. Recommendation: The study suggest that the CHA2DS2‑VASc score can be an independent predictor of no‑reflow phenomenon in patients undergoing primary PCI. As a simple and easy‑to‑calculate score, it might be a useful assessment tool to predict no‑reflow phenomenon before primary PCI interventions in patients with STEMI. Thus we recommend using CHA2DS2-VASc score as it is very simple and a quick tool to predict no-reflow before primary PCI
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信