K. Kerrou, F. Montravers, D. Grahek, N. Younsi, V. de Beco, J.N. Talbot
{"title":"32. 双头重合伽玛仪(CDET) [F-18]-FDG扫描检测卵巢癌复发","authors":"K. Kerrou, F. Montravers, D. Grahek, N. Younsi, V. de Beco, J.N. Talbot","doi":"10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00098-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the role of FDG-CDET in detection of recurrence of ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods and patients:</strong> After a fast of 6 hours, the patient (pt) was injected I. V. with 150–250 MBq of [F-18]-FDG and imaging (whole-body scan and at least a tomoscintigram) was started 45 min. later, using a PICKER Prism XP 2000 CDET gamma camera. Between July 1997 and December 1999, 40 patients were studied for ovarian carcinoma. To date, the results of 23 patients are evaluable with reference to histology after surgery or long-term follow-up. From these 23 patients, 18 pts were referred for suspected recurrence of ovarian carcinoma: occult recurrence (OR) defined by an increase in serum CA-125 levels with negative conventional imaging (13 pts) or equivocal aspect at conventional imaging (5 pts).</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> In 13 pts referred for suspicion of OR, FDG-CDET was true positive (TP) in 11 cases all confirmed by histology after surgery and was true negative (TN) in the remaining 2 cases as confirmed by spontaneous normalization of CA-125 levels and no events during a 20-month follow-up. In the 5 pts with equivocal aspect on CT, 4 were (TP) with recurrent foci at FDG-CDET in 1 case and 1 was (TN) corresponding to a leı̈omyoma on histology after surgery. In summary, the overall sensitivity and accuracy on a per patient basis were 18/18 for FDG-CDET while sensitivity and accuracy of conventional imaging was only 6/18.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> These preliminary results in a clinical setting, which is not frequently evaluated on CDET gamma cameras, seem very promising.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","volume":"3 4","pages":"Page 186"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00098-4","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"32. Detection of Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer using [F-18]-FDG Scan Performed on a Dual-Head Coincidence Gamma Camera (CDET)\",\"authors\":\"K. Kerrou, F. Montravers, D. Grahek, N. Younsi, V. de Beco, J.N. Talbot\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00098-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>Purpose:</strong> The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the role of FDG-CDET in detection of recurrence of ovarian cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods and patients:</strong> After a fast of 6 hours, the patient (pt) was injected I. V. with 150–250 MBq of [F-18]-FDG and imaging (whole-body scan and at least a tomoscintigram) was started 45 min. later, using a PICKER Prism XP 2000 CDET gamma camera. Between July 1997 and December 1999, 40 patients were studied for ovarian carcinoma. To date, the results of 23 patients are evaluable with reference to histology after surgery or long-term follow-up. From these 23 patients, 18 pts were referred for suspected recurrence of ovarian carcinoma: occult recurrence (OR) defined by an increase in serum CA-125 levels with negative conventional imaging (13 pts) or equivocal aspect at conventional imaging (5 pts).</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> In 13 pts referred for suspicion of OR, FDG-CDET was true positive (TP) in 11 cases all confirmed by histology after surgery and was true negative (TN) in the remaining 2 cases as confirmed by spontaneous normalization of CA-125 levels and no events during a 20-month follow-up. In the 5 pts with equivocal aspect on CT, 4 were (TP) with recurrent foci at FDG-CDET in 1 case and 1 was (TN) corresponding to a leı̈omyoma on histology after surgery. In summary, the overall sensitivity and accuracy on a per patient basis were 18/18 for FDG-CDET while sensitivity and accuracy of conventional imaging was only 6/18.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> These preliminary results in a clinical setting, which is not frequently evaluated on CDET gamma cameras, seem very promising.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Page 186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1095-0397(00)00098-4\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095039700000984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095039700000984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
目的:本初步研究的目的是评估FDG-CDET在卵巢癌复发中的作用。方法和患者:禁食6小时后,患者(pt)静脉注射150-250 MBq的[F-18]-FDG, 45分钟后使用PICKER Prism XP 2000 CDET伽马相机开始成像(全身扫描和至少一次断层扫描)。在1997年7月至1999年12月期间,对40名卵巢癌患者进行了研究。迄今为止,23例患者的结果可参考术后组织学或长期随访进行评估。在这23名患者中,18名患者被诊断为疑似卵巢癌复发:隐匿性复发(OR)由血清CA-125水平升高定义,常规影像学阴性(13名)或常规影像学不明确(5名)。结果:13例疑似OR的患者中,11例术后组织学证实FDG-CDET为真阳性(TP),其余2例CA-125水平自发正常化证实为真阴性(TN),随访20个月无事件发生。CT表现不明确的5例患者中,4例为(TP), 1例为FDG-CDET复发灶,1例为(TN),术后组织学上对应于恶性肌瘤。综上所述,FDG-CDET的总体敏感性和准确性为18/18,而常规成像的敏感性和准确性仅为6/18。结论:这些在临床环境中的初步结果,并不经常在CDET伽马相机上进行评估,似乎非常有希望。
32. Detection of Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer using [F-18]-FDG Scan Performed on a Dual-Head Coincidence Gamma Camera (CDET)
Purpose: The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate the role of FDG-CDET in detection of recurrence of ovarian cancer.
Methods and patients: After a fast of 6 hours, the patient (pt) was injected I. V. with 150–250 MBq of [F-18]-FDG and imaging (whole-body scan and at least a tomoscintigram) was started 45 min. later, using a PICKER Prism XP 2000 CDET gamma camera. Between July 1997 and December 1999, 40 patients were studied for ovarian carcinoma. To date, the results of 23 patients are evaluable with reference to histology after surgery or long-term follow-up. From these 23 patients, 18 pts were referred for suspected recurrence of ovarian carcinoma: occult recurrence (OR) defined by an increase in serum CA-125 levels with negative conventional imaging (13 pts) or equivocal aspect at conventional imaging (5 pts).
Results: In 13 pts referred for suspicion of OR, FDG-CDET was true positive (TP) in 11 cases all confirmed by histology after surgery and was true negative (TN) in the remaining 2 cases as confirmed by spontaneous normalization of CA-125 levels and no events during a 20-month follow-up. In the 5 pts with equivocal aspect on CT, 4 were (TP) with recurrent foci at FDG-CDET in 1 case and 1 was (TN) corresponding to a leı̈omyoma on histology after surgery. In summary, the overall sensitivity and accuracy on a per patient basis were 18/18 for FDG-CDET while sensitivity and accuracy of conventional imaging was only 6/18.
Conclusion: These preliminary results in a clinical setting, which is not frequently evaluated on CDET gamma cameras, seem very promising.