墨尔本邻居对残疾人的态度

Q1 Social Sciences
T-Share Team
{"title":"墨尔本邻居对残疾人的态度","authors":"T-Share Team","doi":"10.1017/idm.2014.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deinstitutionalisation of Kew Residential Services (KRS) residents proceeded group by group and took place from October 2002 to April 2008. Residents relocated into either newly built or pre-purchased houses located across Melbourne. In Australia and other developed countries, limited studies suggest that people with intellectual and physical disabilities relocated into group homes have poor social integration into a community. This presentation is based upon findings from a quantitative research project aimed to investigate neighbours’ attitudes towards people with intellectual and physical disabilities living in the Inner Southern Region of Melbourne, who relocated to group homes after closure of KRS. The administered check list questionnaire contained three main parts, including (1) participants’ socio-demographic details, (2) information and strategies neighbours being introduced with the group home people, and (3) the Interaction with Disabled Persons (IDP) Scale. A total number of 290 participants whose properties located in the Inner Southern Region of Melbourne were randomly identified for participation in this study. The collected responses were analysed, applying descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, trivariate analysis, and multivariate analyses. The results of bivariate analyses revealed a statistically significant association between frequency of face-to-face contacts with the group home residents and neighbours’ attitudes towards them, indicating that neighbours who had contacts with the group home residents on a daily/weekly basis had more positive attitudes towards them than the neighbours who had contacts on a less frequent basis. Other variables that were identified as important in bivariate analysis were age, marital status and employment status, and were used in multivariate analysis.","PeriodicalId":53532,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disability Management","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neighbours’ attitudes toward people with disabilities in Melbourne\",\"authors\":\"T-Share Team\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/idm.2014.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deinstitutionalisation of Kew Residential Services (KRS) residents proceeded group by group and took place from October 2002 to April 2008. Residents relocated into either newly built or pre-purchased houses located across Melbourne. In Australia and other developed countries, limited studies suggest that people with intellectual and physical disabilities relocated into group homes have poor social integration into a community. This presentation is based upon findings from a quantitative research project aimed to investigate neighbours’ attitudes towards people with intellectual and physical disabilities living in the Inner Southern Region of Melbourne, who relocated to group homes after closure of KRS. The administered check list questionnaire contained three main parts, including (1) participants’ socio-demographic details, (2) information and strategies neighbours being introduced with the group home people, and (3) the Interaction with Disabled Persons (IDP) Scale. A total number of 290 participants whose properties located in the Inner Southern Region of Melbourne were randomly identified for participation in this study. The collected responses were analysed, applying descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, trivariate analysis, and multivariate analyses. The results of bivariate analyses revealed a statistically significant association between frequency of face-to-face contacts with the group home residents and neighbours’ attitudes towards them, indicating that neighbours who had contacts with the group home residents on a daily/weekly basis had more positive attitudes towards them than the neighbours who had contacts on a less frequent basis. Other variables that were identified as important in bivariate analysis were age, marital status and employment status, and were used in multivariate analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Disability Management\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Disability Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/idm.2014.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disability Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/idm.2014.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2002年10月至2008年4月期间,对邱园住宿服务(KRS)的居民进行了分组去机构化。居民们被安置在墨尔本各地新建或预先购买的房屋中。在澳大利亚和其他发达国家,有限的研究表明,安置在集体之家的智力和身体残疾者很难融入社区。本次演讲基于一项定量研究项目的结果,该项目旨在调查邻居对居住在墨尔本内南部地区的智力和身体残疾人士的态度,这些人在KRS关闭后搬到了集体之家。问卷调查包含三个主要部分,包括:(1)参与者的社会人口统计资料,(2)与团体之家的人介绍邻居的信息和策略,以及(3)与残疾人士互动量表。共有290名参与者,他们的房产位于墨尔本内南部地区,被随机确定参加这项研究。采用描述性统计、双变量分析、三变量分析和多变量分析对收集到的调查结果进行分析。双变量分析的结果显示,与团体之家居民面对面接触的频率与邻居对他们的态度有显著的统计学关联,表明每天或每周与团体之家居民接触的邻居比接触频率较低的邻居对他们的态度更积极。在双变量分析中被确定为重要的其他变量是年龄、婚姻状况和就业状况,并用于多变量分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neighbours’ attitudes toward people with disabilities in Melbourne
Deinstitutionalisation of Kew Residential Services (KRS) residents proceeded group by group and took place from October 2002 to April 2008. Residents relocated into either newly built or pre-purchased houses located across Melbourne. In Australia and other developed countries, limited studies suggest that people with intellectual and physical disabilities relocated into group homes have poor social integration into a community. This presentation is based upon findings from a quantitative research project aimed to investigate neighbours’ attitudes towards people with intellectual and physical disabilities living in the Inner Southern Region of Melbourne, who relocated to group homes after closure of KRS. The administered check list questionnaire contained three main parts, including (1) participants’ socio-demographic details, (2) information and strategies neighbours being introduced with the group home people, and (3) the Interaction with Disabled Persons (IDP) Scale. A total number of 290 participants whose properties located in the Inner Southern Region of Melbourne were randomly identified for participation in this study. The collected responses were analysed, applying descriptive statistics, bivariate analyses, trivariate analysis, and multivariate analyses. The results of bivariate analyses revealed a statistically significant association between frequency of face-to-face contacts with the group home residents and neighbours’ attitudes towards them, indicating that neighbours who had contacts with the group home residents on a daily/weekly basis had more positive attitudes towards them than the neighbours who had contacts on a less frequent basis. Other variables that were identified as important in bivariate analysis were age, marital status and employment status, and were used in multivariate analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Disability Management
International Journal of Disability Management Social Sciences-Health (social science)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信